When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

What now?
What now?
Stefan Kornelius

-OpEd-

MUNICH — When the Winter Olympics ended Sunday evening, the second part of the Ukrainian revolution began. Now the country’s cohesion and its chances of economic survival will be decided.

After a dramatic week in Kiev, a civil war was avoided when the Ukraine Parliament removed the president from power. And now even Ukrainians in pro-Russian regions are beginning to see the opportunities that present themselves following fallen President Viktor Yanukovych’s oligarchy.

But the actual reasons for the revolution have not been settled by any stretch of the imagination. Although she is being hailed as a force of healing, former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko has way too much political baggage to alleviate the tough societal conflicts at play. And the revolution hasn’t changed Ukraine’s economic dependence on Russia.

On Sunday, the Ukrainian parliament gave interim presidential authority to the speaker, opposition leader Oleksandr Turchynov. President Yanukovych had been ousted on Saturday. Meanwhile, another opposition leader, Vitali Klitschko, encouraged demonstrators to keep a critical eye on the political process.

Now that the Sochi Olympics are over, Russian President Vladimir Putin will want to exercise influence on his neighbors. He considers Ukraine an important, if not constitutional, part of his area of influence. But one truth remains as clear now as it was before the revolution: The country cannot become the front for a new Cold War. Yet as long as Putin divides the world into areas of influence, he will not release Ukraine from its role as buffer.

The EU stands at the center of all expectations. What began in 2009 as a negotiation towards partnership now looks as if it might become a sort of duty. It was the EU promise of freedom that gave Ukrainians hope for a better future. The EU stands for the rule of law, for life without corruption or the power of oligarchs. With the Maidan protests, Europe has inherited a major development project.

Part of the project will mean dealing with another strong figure in Ukraine — Yulia Tymoshenko. Perhaps the charismatic politician will be able to convince the Russophile population that a united Ukraine is in everyone’s best interests. But Tymoshenko is herself burdened by associations with a dubious economic and power elite. She lacks the integrity that a leadership figure must demonstrate with regard to Russia. She doesn’t have the credibility to take on the oligarchs.

The first part of the revolution is over. With impressive courage, the people revolted against despotism, corruption and bad leadership. But the real revolution in Ukraine still lies ahead.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

Watching Putin's address at the 10th Moscow Conference on International Security

Anton Novoderezhkin/TASS
Anna Akage and Emma Albright

While delivering the welcome address at the Moscow Conference on International Security on Tuesday, Vladimir Putin accused Washington of “dragging out” the conflict in Ukraine. The Russian president also mentioned the visit by Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan earlier this month, calling it a “thoroughly planned provocation”. The conference, which runs from Aug. 15 to 17, is hosted by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and will include several panels on global security issues.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Putin added that Western countries were trying to extend a “NATO-like system” into the Asia Pacific region. For Putin, NATO’s expansion in Europe was one of the main causes for his invasion of Ukraine. Putin had previously accused NATO of launching an active military build-up on territories surrounding Russia during a speech to mark Russia’s Victory Day in May.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ