When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Economic Aid, Not Military Arms, Is What Ukraine Needs

A Ukrainian soldier checks a site destroyed by Russian forces on Aug. 7.
A Ukrainian soldier checks a site destroyed by Russian forces on Aug. 7.
Jean-Gabriel Fredet


PARIS — What can Europe do after Kiev's desperate call for help in dealing with the invasion of Russian troops in eastern Ukraine, where separatists are gaining control? Let's leave aside for the moment the hypothesis of military aid. European defense doesn't exist. What's more, we run the risk of escalation — an imbalance that no one in the West seems disposed to take, given that Ukraine is not part of NATO.

So it's not possible for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to refer to Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty and benefit from automatic military help from NATO partners in the event of invasion. Certainly, NATO recently intensified its partnership with Kiev because "a sovereign, independent and stable Ukraine is essential for Euro-Atlantic security."

But it's impossible to go beyond intensifying military exercises or air patrols along Ukrainian borders, like those that yielded the satellite images revealing the presence of 1,000 Russian soldiers apparently directly involved in the fighting in eastern Ukraine.

On the eve of today's special meeting of NATO ambassadors in Brussels, General Philip Breedlove, Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO Allied Command Operations, reaffirmed that the organization would "respond militarily" to any similar incursion onto the territory of NATO members. That didn't do much to reassure Ukrainians who aren't members of the "club."

Tightening EU sanctions against Russia would be an easier reaction, but would it be more effective? The two first European salvos have weakened the Russian economy considerably, with growth and exports lowered, devaluation of the ruble, a tumbling stock market, and freezes on visas and the assets of oligarchs in foreign banks.

But none of this has weakened Vladimir Putin's determination. By way of reprisal, the Russian president placed an embargo on Western agricultural exports. Yet Brussels seems resolved to put extra pressure on. The future High Representative for Foreign Affairs who will replace Catherine Ashton at the end of this week will have to contend with the reticence of countries that import Russian gas or oil (which makes up 30% of German consumption, for example). There is also a shared fear of aggravating the recession in the euro zone.

"The best way for the EU to answer Kiev's cry for help? Strengthen economic aid," one French diplomat concludes. Riddled with debt (the gas deficit alone amounts to $4.6 billion) and faced with an economy threatening to collapse unless an estimated $66 billion comes its way, Ukraine desperately needs EU benefits outlined in the framework of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement signed last June.

Consolidation of this agreement, decided in Minsk, could pave the way to a series of cooperative efforts that would make it possible for the country to finance indispensable reforms. Together with the "Merkel plan" ($659 million to reconstruct the Donbas war zones), this agreement is the real measure of what Europe can do right now in the framework of its eastern partnership: credits, financial and technical cooperation, and opening up to Ukrainian products. But most certainly: no arms and no military aid.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

eyes on the U.S.

Murdoch's Resignation Adds To Biden Good Luck With The Media — A Repeat Of FDR?

Robert Murdoch's resignation from Fox News Corp. so soon before the next U.S. presidential elections begs the question of how directly media coverage has impacted Joe Biden as a figure, and what this new shift in power will mean for the current President.

Close up photograph of a opy of The Independent features Rupert Murdoch striking a pensive countenance as his 'News of the World' tabloid newspaper announced its last edition will run

July 7, 2011 - London, England: A copy of The Independent features Rupert Murdoch striking a pensive countenance as his 'News of the World' tabloid newspaper announced its last edition will run July 11, 2011 amid a torrid scandal involving phone hacking.

Mark Makela/ZUMA
Michael J. Socolow

Joe Biden was inaugurated as the 46th president of the United States of America on Jan. 20, 2021.

Imagine if someone could go back in time and inform him and his communications team that a few pivotal changes in the media would occur during his first three years in office.

There’s the latest news that Rubert Murdoch, 92, stepped down as the chairperson of Fox Corp. and News Corp. on Sept. 21, 2023. Since the 1980s, Murdoch, who will be replaced by his son Lachlan, has been the most powerful right-wing media executivein the U.S.

While it’s not clear whether Fox will be any tamer under Lachlan, Murdoch’s departure is likely good news for Biden, who reportedly despises the media baron.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest