eyes on the U.S.

Lawyer Up! Clinton, Trump Camps Prepare For Contested Vote

A December 2000 file photo shows Supreme Court protests before Bush v. Gore decision.
A December 2000 file photo shows Supreme Court protests before Bush v. Gore decision.
Mark Niquette and Margaret Talev

WASHINGTON â€" Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are arming up for a possible post-Election Day battle.

Clinton is assembling a voter protection program that has drawn thousands of lawyers agreeing to lend their time and expertise in battleground states, though the campaign isn't saying exactly how many or where. It is readying election observers in Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada and Arizona to assess any concerns -- including the potential for voter intimidation -- and to verify normal procedures.

The Republican National Lawyers Association, which trains attorneys in battleground states and in local jurisdictions where races are expected to be close, aims to assemble 1,000 lawyers ready to monitor polls and possibly challenge election results across the country. Hedge fund manager Robert Mercer, one of Trump's biggest backers, has sunk $500,000 into the group, its biggest donation in at least four presidential elections, Internal Revenue Service filings show.

"We are fighting for open, fair and honest elections,"" the association's Executive Director Michael Thielen said in an email.

Most discussion about the potential for a contested election until now has revolved around the premise of a Trump loss, his contention that the election is "rigged" and his refusal to say ahead of time that he would concede. But since FBI Director James Comey's controversial disclosure on Friday that he is reviewing newly discovered e-mails possibly related to an investigation of Clinton, several polls have shown the race tightening considerably.

Although Clinton still holds an advantage -- currently 2.5 percentage points in the RealClear Politics average of national polls -- the developments have raised the prospect of a much closer than expected result and a previously unforeseen question: Would Clinton refuse to concede and wait for recounts and certified results or initiate legal action if she narrowly loses one or more battleground states decisive to the election.

"If the perception is we're heading into a close election and it actually is close, then you'd have the sense that the candidates - maybe on both sides - would say, "Well, we've really got to make sure we look at every ballot,""" said Edward Foley, director of the election law program at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law.

In the final presidential debate, Trump surprisingly said he would "keep you in suspense" on the question of whether he'd accept the election results. For the Clinton campaign, what Trump says on election night, even in the face of a clear loss, is the least of its concerns.

"If he just simply refuses to concede that night, which is a possibility we're increasingly bracing for, we don't think that is a worrisome prospect,"" Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said last week. The campaign is preparing more for traditional legal challenges.

Trump at a Phoenix, Arizona rally â€" Photo: Gage Skidmore

While a concession from a presidential candidate has cultural significance in helping the country accept the result and move on, it has "no legal status whatsoever," Foley said.

Just the numbers

The only thing that counts is the count -- and then maybe the recount.

Each state releases an unofficial vote on election night that is made official after a post-election canvass confirms the accuracy. When a state certifies its official result, that determines the slate of Electoral College electors who meet Dec. 19. Congress accepts that vote on Jan. 6 to declare a president-elect.

Foley said there are three scenarios to watch for on election night: a blowout; an election in which the race in one or more states needed for one of the candidates to get the 270 electoral votes needed to win is too close to call and recounts are needed, as in Florida in 2000; and a close race where the unofficial vote shows a winner but there are questions about whether uncounted absentee or provisional ballots could change the outcome, as in Ohio in 2004, when John Kerry waited until the morning after the election to concede.

In a blowout, whether the losing candidate concedes won't matter because the distribution of Electoral College result will be clear once state results are certified.

If the race is too close to call in one or more states and the Electoral College outcome is in doubt, the winner may not be determined until the official state results are certified. That's what happened in the 1884 and 1916 presidential elections, when the losing candidates waited until the official results to concede but there was no civil unrest, Foley said.

In 2000, Democrat Al Gore retracted his election-night concession after it became clear Florida was was too close to call with him trailing George W. Bush by only a few hundred votes in the state. After a month-long legal fight, Gore conceded after the U.S. Supreme Court barred further recounts.

Trump has been fanning doubt about the vote count by repeatedly talking about a system that is "rigged" against him. Still, his running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, has rejected the notion that the campaign is fostering the idea the election result might be invalid because of fraud.

"When Donald Trump talks about a rigged election, we're talking as much about the documented bias in the national media that seems to be doing half of Hillary Clinton's work for her every day,"" he said Friday on MSNBC.

The losing candidate's ability to contest the results with a recount depends in part on how close the unofficial results are and where. The nation's capital and 20 states, including a handful of battleground states, call for an automatic recount if the margin is narrow enough, such as 0.5 percent or fewer of the total votes cast in Florida, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Recount requests

A losing candidate can ask for a recount in 43 states, while a few states will only consider that request if the race falls within a certain margin, according to NCSL. Political party officers can seek recounts in at least five states, and voters can seek recounts in at least 17 states, the group said.

If a recount is not an option, losing candidates still may seek to challenge the election results or the circumstances preceding those results in the courts.

Trump has been encouraging people at his rallies to "go out and watch"" at polling places as part of his contention that the election could be "rigged,"" despite the lack of any evidence of widespread voter impersonation. He also has a sign-up page on his website for volunteers to be election observers to "help me stop Crooked Hillary Clinton from rigging this election.""

Almost all states have statutory provisions for partisan election observers, and at least 35 states and the District of Columbia allow nonpartisan citizen observers, according to NCSL. Rules and provisions for who can be observers and what they are allowed to do at the polls vary by state, but federal and state laws prohibit discriminating against or intimidating voters, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.

Clinton at a Manchester, N.H. rally â€" Photo: Tim Pierce

In Ohio, a battleground state where polls show the race is essentially tied, a person can be appointed as a precinct observer by a state or county political party, a group of five or more candidates or a ballot issue committee, according to the Secretary of State's Office.

The number of requests for people to be Republican observers appear to be similar to past election cycles, said Brittany Warner, a spokeswoman for the state party. The Ohio Democratic Party is mobilizing the same program is has for the past few presidential elections, Chairman David Pepper said.

That includes having observers at 1,500 locations statewide and at each of the state's 88 county boards of elections, plus a "boiler room"" on Election Day staffed by lawyers from the state and across the country who come to Ohio to respond to any problems, Pepper said.

The Justice Department also plans to send hundreds of trained personnel to states to help deter voter intimidation. However, because of a 2013 Supreme Court ruling limiting the application of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the department will send fewer personnel than in 2012. The exact numbers and states won't be released until just before the election.

The Democratic National Committee has asked a federal judge to block the Republican Party from supporting efforts to discourage minorities from voting based on Trump's rhetoric. It alleges that the Republican National Committee is violating a 1982 court order to stop "ballot-security" measures aimed at deterring voters. A hearing is set for Nov. 2.

Fallon said the Clinton campaign does not expect claims of widespread irregularities to actually surface. Ohio, Florida and other battleground states also have Republican governors and secretaries of state who are committed to running smooth elections and avoiding the problems that Trump is suggesting, he said.

"They have an incentive to defend the integrity of their processes,"" Fallon said. "He's not going to find an audience to go along with his conspiracy theories.""

*Bloomberg's Bill Allison and Chris Strohm contributed.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

What It Means When The Jews Of Germany No Longer Feel Safe

A neo-Nazi has been buried in the former grave of a Jewish musicologist Max Friedlaender – not an oversight, but a deliberate provocation. This is just one more example of antisemitism on the rise in Germany, and society's inability to respond.

At a protest against antisemitism in Berlin

Eva Marie Kogel


BERLIN — If you want to check the state of your society, there's a simple test: as the U.S. High Commissioner for Germany, John Jay McCloy, said in 1949, the touchstone for a democracy is the well-being of Jews. This litmus test is still relevant today. And it seems Germany would not pass.

Incidents are piling up. Most recently, groups of neo-Nazis from across the country traveled to a church near Berlin for the funeral of a well-known far-right figure. He was buried in the former grave of Jewish musicologist Max Friedlaender, a gravesite chosen deliberately by the right-wing extremists.

The incident at the cemetery

They intentionally chose a Jewish grave as an act of provocation, trying to gain maximum publicity for this act of desecration. And the cemetery authorities at the graveyard in Stahnsdorf fell for it. The church issued an immediate apology, calling it a "terrible mistake" and saying they "must immediately see whether and what we can undo."

There are so many incidents that get little to no media attention.

It's unfathomable that this burial was allowed to take place at all, but now the cemetery authorities need to make a decision quickly about how to put things right. Otherwise, the grave may well become a pilgrimage site for Holocaust deniers and antisemites.

The incident has garnered attention in the international press and it will live long in the memory. Like the case of singer-songwriter Gil Ofarim, who recently claimed he was subjected to antisemitic abuse at a hotel in Leipzig. Details of the crime are still being investigated. But there are so many other incidents that get little to no media attention.

Photo of the grave of Jewish musicologist Max Friedlaender

The grave of Jewish musicologist Max Friedlaender

Jens Kalaene/dpa/ZUMA

Crimes against Jews are rising

Across all parts of society, antisemitism is on the rise. Until a few years ago, Jewish life was seen as an accepted part of German society. Since the attack on the synagogue in Halle in 2019, the picture has changed: it was a bitter reminder that right-wing terror against Jewish people has a long, unbroken history in Germany.

Stories have abounded about the coronavirus crisis being a Jewish conspiracy; meanwhile, Muslim antisemitism is becoming louder and more forceful. The anti-Israel boycott movement BDS rears its head in every debate on antisemitism, just as left-wing or post-colonial thinking are part of every discussion.

Jewish life needs to be allowed to step out of the shadows.

Since 2015, the number of antisemitic crimes recorded has risen by about a third, to 2,350. But victims only report around 20% of cases. Some choose not to because they've had bad experiences with the police, others because they're afraid of the perpetrators, and still others because they just want to put it behind them. Victims clearly hold out little hope of useful reaction from the state – so crimes go unreported.

And the reality of Jewish life in Germany is a dark one. Sociologists say that Jewish children are living out their "identity under siege." What impact does it have on them when they can only go to nursery under police protection? Or when they hear Holocaust jokes at school?

Germany needs to take its antisemitism seriously

This shows that the country of commemorative services and "stumbling blocks" placed in sidewalks as a memorial to victims of the Nazis has lost its moral compass. To make it point true north again, antisemitism needs to be documented from the perspective of those affected, making it visible to the non-Jewish population. And Jewish life needs to be allowed to step out of the shadows.

That is the first thing. The second is that we need to talk about specifically German forms of antisemitism. For example, the fact that in no other EU country are Jewish people so often confronted about the Israeli government's policies (according to a survey, 41% of German Jews have experienced this, while the EU average is 28%). Projecting the old antisemitism onto the state of Israel offers people a more comfortable target for their arguments.

Our society needs to have more conversations about antisemitism. The test of German democracy, as McCloy called it, starts with taking these concerns seriously and talking about them. We need to have these conversations because it affects all of us. It's about saving our democracy. Before it's too late.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!