When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Sources

Will Technology Make Human Memory Obsolete?

With writing and then printing, man had already externalized a part of his memory. But those transformations pale, in both speed and breadth, with the current digital revolution.

Have we met before?
Have we met before?
Jacques Henno

PARIS — Quick question for urban citizens who own a car: How do you remember where you parked you car the night before? You could memorize the street name and number, which is not very modern (prehistoric man already used his "internal" memory); you could take out a pen and write the address down, though that is so old media (writing and papyrus were invented more than 5,000 years ago); or you could take a picture of the parking spot with your smartphone. Not bad.

But you can get even trendier: downloading an app like Tuture that automatically remembers where your car is.

The deeper question is: How far will the externalization of our memory go? The human being has always used his creativity to devise solutions to save him effort. We have constantly subcontracted a part of the effort of our organs, like muscular work, to others (prisoners, slaves ... ), animals (horses, donkeys ... ) and then to tools or machines.

Memory did not escape this longstanding practice. "We're living the third act of the externalization of memory," declares Michel Serres. "First there was, in Mesopotamia in about 3,500 BC, the transition from oral to written communication, that allowed humans to transpose memory into codes, written words, on an external object, shelves, papyrus scrolls. Then, there was the invention of printing in the 15th century in Europe."

For this philosopher and historian of science, with the digital age we are again living through an extraordinary change on this front. "Writings, sounds, images — Digital technology can save almost everything and spread it very quickly: Half of humanity now has a cellphone."

Memory prostheses

Necessary memorization efforts to acquire and transmit knowledge have been drastically reduced. In the distant past, instructors, those from the oral tradition, had to learn everything by heart; their successors, those from the written tradition, were required only to remember where and how to find a book about any given topic. This effort is now unnecessary. "Today, the access to information is much better than the two previous revolutions: You only need to type some keywords in a search engine," adds Serres.

This all makes it tempting to entrust everything to these "memory prostheses." A study conducted on 6,000 Europeans a few months ago by Kaspersky Lab, specialized in cyber security, revealed that 43% of the respondents between 16 and 24 years old, believe their smartphone contains practically everything they need to know or remember. Some experts, like Nicholas Carr, author of Does the Internet Make You Dumber? or to a lesser extent, Betsy Sparrow, from the department of psychology at New York's Columbia University, believe that youth today suffer from "digital amnesia."

This observation should be seen in relative terms. First, the experts' views should be taken with caution, simply because they feel threatened by the current revolution, they tend to denigrate it. "If the book was mostly a reading revolution, digital is a revolution that plays down the importance of writing for a large proportion of humanity," states Laurence Allard, a sociologist specialized in innovative communication practices. "So, elites, who until now were the only ones to have access to writing and knowledge, are perturbed."

Secondly, we still lack perspective regarding the phenomenon. "It's important that we think about the impact of new technologies on education and children," notes Francis Eustache, a neuropsychologist, director of a French research unit completely dedicated to the study of human memory, INSERM Unit U1077. "We would need to be able to conduct an objective study but we lack scientific data."

Critical mind

One thing is certain: If we want to remain social, keep understanding the world, stay imaginative and delay the effects of aging, we will have to be sure our memory is still functioning. "We should give children the time they need to read, learn poetry, songs ... everything that constitutes our collective memory," says Eustache. "Otherwise, our society might lose common ground."

Memory is also essential to a better personal life. "Children are capable of looking to the future when they can remember yesterday," explains Michel Desmurget, a researcher in neurosciences and research director at INSERM. "Memory is the indispensable foundation of intelligence and creativity: Without it, great minds would not have established links between two pieces of information that had never been compared before."

But in addition to intelligence, critical minds and curiosity will stay essential. If only to sort the information proposed by tomorrow's memory props (connected watches, companion robots etc.). "Google organizes knowledge according to mysterious algorithms: We have to provide our kids with judgment skills and critical thinking that's, sort of, the trademark of the French education, inherited from the Age of Enlightenment," says Catherine Becchetti-Bizot, the former director of the Ministry of National Education program, "digital for education."

Then on the other side of the life cycle is another consideration: To stem the effects of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, researchers say it is important to stimulate the intellectual activity that calls on memory, known as "cognitive reserve."

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Future

Injecting Feminism Into Science Is A Good Thing — For Science

Feminists have generated a set of tools to make science less biased and more robust. Why don’t more scientists use it?

As objective as any man

Anto Magzan/ZUMA
Rachel E. Gross

-Essay-

In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, a mystery played out across news headlines: Men, it seemed, were dying of infection at twice the rate of women. To explain this alarming disparity, researchers looked to innate biological differences between the sexes — for instance, protective levels of sex hormones, or distinct male-female immune responses. Some even went so far as to test the possibility of treating infected men with estrogen injections.

This focus on biological sex differences turned out to be woefully inadequate, as a group of Harvard-affiliated researchers pointed out earlier this year. By analyzing more than a year of sex-disaggregated COVID-19 data, they showed that the gender gap was more fully explained by social factors like mask-wearing and distancing behaviors (less common among men) and testing rates (higher among pregnant women and health workers, who were largely female).

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ