When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Future

Why AI Is Now The Key Ingredient For Modern Productivity

Sara Pereira passes the security robot ''Roboguard'' at a press conference for a security fair, on Sept. 20.
Sara Pereira passes the security robot ''Roboguard'' at a press conference for a security fair, on Sept. 20.
Alidad Vassigh

-Analysis-

CARACASArtificial Intelligence is opening up new opportunities for the economy and society. But it will also affect millions of human jobs, and thus poses a huge challenge for public policymakers, warns a 2016 White House report on AI's projected impact on the U.S. economy.

Among other things, the report predicts that AI will have a positive impact on productivity growth in firms while dramatically shifting the skills people must have to participate in the job market. Job markets, the study argues, are expected to become fluid and uncertain as some positions disappear, giving way to others.

All of that makes foresight in public policymaking vital to making good use of AI's advantages. Policymakers must get ahead of the game, and design plans and compensations needed to mitigate the impact of the significant losses technological changes will entail for pertinent actors.

The report predicts that AI will have a positive impact on productivity growth.

As the projected changes mentioned above illustrate, AI and the economy are deeply intertwined. But to understand another dimension of the relationship between the two disciplines, one should consider the basic concepts of intelligence and AI.

The definition of intelligence is complex. Indeed, there are as many definitions as there are intelligent people. Just to keep things simple, let's consider intelligence as a wide-ranging set of mental abilities and potentials that become manifest in our actions.

AI also has many definitions, though it may be reduced here to the rational and logical action of machines in response to surrounding stimuli. Implied in that, of course, is an ability to learn constantly. AI only considers the rational (logical and mathematical) part of human intelligence, at least in its initial steps.

One of the pioneers of AI was Herbert Simon, a Nobel Prize winner in economics. Simon poked a number of holes in the principle of perfect rationality in economic agents, a fundamental premise of classical economic theory. First off, he argued that Homo economicus does not face situations in a state of perfect competence. Simon also showed how environmental uncertainty (imperfect information) prevents businesspeople from making exact predictions, forcing them to constantly revise objectives. This provokes costs that prevent them from reaching their optimal goal.

American political scientist, economist, sociologist, psychologist, and computer scientist Herbert Simon — Photo: TheFamousPeople

In addition, Simon notes that people are innately limited in their ability to perceive all of reality's complex elements. This "bounded rationality," as he calls it, is what justifies the use of machines to help us access all data needed to make optimal decisions. Rational machines can process vast amounts of data, far more than individual or even a group of people can, and can thus improve productivity and reduce costs.

For Simon, individuals are simple agents, and the complexity of their conduct has more to do with the complexity of their surroundings than their limited mental capacities. So if a person's rationality is limited and an individual cannot find optimal solutions to economic problems, firms will inevitably need machines to process vast amounts of data and find those solutions. In practice, this means procedural rationality, which is the sum of the abilities of many individuals in certain intelligent algorithms. In addition, AI forms are able to learn, be free of emotions and boost economic efficiency.

Simon was a pioneer of AI and its relationship with economics, in large part because he demonstrated the importance of the former by highlighting the later's limitations, and by critiquing the "perfectly rational" economic man. We know today that data is the driving force behind the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and that for firms to be competitive and productive, they need to properly process that data.

We also know that labor markets will very soon be determinedbyrobotics, AI and all the disruptive technologies that empower production while substituting humans. This is an enormous challenge both for individuals and public policymaking within societies that must invest to maximize their capabilities and ensure they retain their roles in the face of competition from intelligent machines.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

Utter Pessimism, What Israelis And Palestinians Share In Common

Right now, according to a joint survey of Israelis and Palestinians, hopes for a peaceful solution of coexistence simply don't exist. The recent spate of violence is confirmation of the deepest kind of pessimism on both sides for any solution other than domination of the other.

An old Palestinian protester waves Palestinian flag while he confronts the Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the village of Beit Dajan near the West Bank city of Nablus.

A Palestinian protester confronts Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the West Bank village of Beit Dajan on Jan. 6.

Pierre Haski

-Analysis-

PARIS — Just before the latest outbreak of violence between Israelis and Palestinians, a survey of public opinion among the two peoples provided a key to understanding the current situation unfolding before our eyes.

It was a joint study, entitled "Palestinian-Israeli Pulse", carried out by two research centers, one Israeli, the other Palestinian, which for years have been regularly asking the same questions to both sides.

The result is disastrous: not only is the support for the two-state solution — Israel and Palestine side by side — at its lowest point in two decades, but there is now a significant share of opinion on both sides that favors a "non-democratic" solution, i.e., a single state controlled by either the Israelis or Palestinians.

This captures the absolute sense of pessimism commonly felt regarding the chances of the two-state option ever being realized, which currently appears to be our grim reality today. But the results are also an expression of the growing acceptance on both sides that it is inconceivable for either state to live without dominating the other — and therefore impossible to live in peace.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest