May 24, 2016
PARIS Ââ€" Formally speaking, Alexandra Elbakyan, 27, lives in Almaty, her hometown in Kazakhstan. But in reality, she probably lives somewhere in Russia. Her life and her travels are now secret: in October 2015, a New York federal court found her guilty of pirating scientific articles owned by Anglo-Dutch publisher Elsevier.
Elbakyan works as a computer engineer and is specialized in futuristic programs that aim to provide a direct connection between the brain and a computer. But since 2011, she is also the creator and moderator of the website Sci-Hub. It offers the free download of all scientific articles that are available on the Internet. These articles largely come from the websites of the leading international scientific publishers like Elsevier, Germany's Springer and the New Jersey-based Wiley, which hold exclusive distribution rights and sell them at a high price. A private individual pays an average of $32 (28,50 euros) per article and the large libraries have to buy a range of subscriptions, which cost them millions of dollars each year.
The young Kazakh admits that since her conviction, her situation is far from ideal. "I don't feel endangered where I am now, but I have to be careful," she told Le Monde in a telephone interview. She doesn't travel to the United States any more, or to any other country that has an extradition treaty with Washington. It is a major change for this bright student, who was frequently invited in Europe and in America for fellowships and conferences.
During the summer 2015, she called and wrote to the judge in New York in order to defend her action. "When I was a student in Kazakhstan, I had no access to any of the articles I needed for my research," she told him. "Thirty-two dollars, it is way too much when you have to read dozens or hundreds of articles for your research." She explained that, thanks to the Internet, it is now a common practice for scientific communities around the world to freely share articles. She used this informal system often during her studies. Then, she decided to share this system with others. "People have always been grateful. Sci-Hub only automates that process," she said. "It became popular right away."
And for a good reason. The big publishers don't pay a cent to the authors or their peers who are in charge of proofreading and editing the articles. If an author wants his article to be freely distributed to attract more readers, he has to pay the publisher, sometimes more than $2,000. An agreement that Elbakyan calls "racketeering."
The judge in New York was not convinced. He ordered the deactivation of the website address Sci-hub.org (the domain ".org" is managed by the American association Public Interest Registry), and demanded that Elbakyan cease all activities related to the site. He also condemned LibGen (Library Genesis), a Russian website of pirated books that collaborates with Sci-Hub but whose managers remained anonymous. According to Elsevierâ€™s American lawyer, the ruling handed down in October was just a first step. The publisher is asking for colossal damages and compensation fees.
Elbakyan was not intimated and even fought back. In December, she reopened her website with the domain name ".io", which is under British jurisdiction, and with an IP address related to a web host in Saint Petersburg. The new website was also accessible via the secure network TOR, which allows someone to browse the Internet anonymously and without being tracked. Within a few weeks, Sci-Hub was again getting millions of visitors each month, largely from China, India, Iran, and Russia, but also from the United States.
Over time, the young programmer managed to build up a product of professional quality. In its 2016 version, Sci-Hub offers a search engine that can find any scientific article thanks to its standard reference or a key word. If the article is still unknown, the system is going to search it surreptitiously on the publisherâ€™s website, by pretending to be a legitimate subscriber. Then the system sends a copy to the requester and another to the website LibGen, which stores it on its illicit servers. Thus, as Elbakyan explains, "the article will still exist on the Internet even if something happens to Sci-Hub." When another user will request that same article, Sci-Hub will simply look for it in LibGen. In March 2016, LibGenâ€™s â€œfree libraryâ€ possessed 48 million articles, four times more than Elsevierâ€¦
The Kazakh academic pirate insists she has a life outside Sci-Hub: she works as a web programmer and went back to school to study History and Philosophy of Science. Having said that, she admits that managing her website is very time-consuming. "I have a lot of supporters but they are not well organized. They send me donations but for the most part, their commitment is not really serious," she said. "All in all, I probably work more than the publishers."
Despite her solitude, Elbakyan set herself a goal that she describes without any false modesty: "I want to collect the entire range of scientific and educational literature and make it accessible to the whole world. Just like Google Books, but maybe in a more ambitious way."
It is a task less unrealistic than it may seem. For Elbakyanâ€™s adventure is part of a widespread global movement within the scientific community: "Open Access" advocates for free access to the entire range of scientific literature and is starting to take off in some disciplines. Outside Sci-Hub, researchers from many countries are already freely exchanging articles without consulting anyone, via email, Facebook, Twitter or Redditâ€¦
Others made Sci-Hub the subject of their research studies, contributing to its popularity. In France, Guillaume Cabanac, university lecturer in computer science at the Toulouse University, published in 2015 "the first quantitative study of web platforms LibGen and Sci-Hubâ€™s catalogues."
Canadian librarian Ryan Regier organized a conference about "scholarly piracy" last February in Toronto. "I started to have an interest in this when I noted that in my university, researchers and students worked on articles they didn't get at the library," he said.
Even If he stops short of expressing openly his solidarity with Alexandra Elbakyan, Regier hopes that Sci-Hub will serve as a catalyst to push forward the Open Access movement. "Sci-Hub has already made a difference by becoming the greatest scientific library in the world," he said. "It is simpler, more efficient and more exhaustive than the largest librariesâ€™ system, which are constrained by their bureaucratic traditions."
Technically, the websiteâ€™s operation is closely linked with the university libraries. "The usersâ€™ requests are re-routed via university networks. The publisherâ€™s website only notices that they come from a university and not from a user of Sci-Hub", the computer engineer explains without giving any details.
Beyond the field of research, Sci-Hub is supported by associations that defend Internet freedoms and by political groups of the alternative left. After the New York Courtâ€™s verdict, an informal group named Custodians published an open letter in sixteen languages, calling for action in support of Alexandra Elbakyan.
One of the initiators, Marcell Mars, a computer scientist and digital artist living in Zagreb, Croatia, describes the importance of Sci-Hub in his entourage. "It became an essential tool for research institutions that are located at the periphery of the capitalist world, both geographically and socially," Mars said. "Here, the university professors use it all the time, some even give links to Sci-Hub to their students."
Sci-Hub even has supporters within the Western scientific establishment. Ulrich Dirnagl, professor of medicine and director of the division of neurology at the Charité hospital in Berlin, offers open praise for the Kazakh pirate. "I don't know what to think about this woman in Russia but she has worked a miracle," he says. "For years I use to receive emails from researchers living in Cuba or Romania, who asked me to send them our articles freely. It is illegal but I gladly did it. Yet for some time now, they had stopped their requests. I was wondering why, but when I found out about Sci-Hub, I understood: They served themselves directly!"
In early March, Professor Dirnagl announced to members of his unit that from now on, they would have to publish their work on Open Access. "I also talked to them about Sci-Hub. Most of them didn't know about it, I told them to test it," he said. "If researchers from rich countries start to use the website, the current system is going to collapse."
This leading French daily newspaper Le Monde ("The World") was founded in December 1944 in the aftermath of World War II. Today, it is distributed in 120 countries. In late 2010, a trio formed by Pierre Berge, Xavier Niel and Matthieu Pigasse took a controlling 64.5% stake in the newspaper.
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Once meant to protect the royal family, the century-old law has become a tool for the military-led government in Bangkok to stamp out all dissent. A new report outlines the abuses.
Laura Valentina Cortés Sierra
October 22, 2021
"We need to reform the institution of the monarchy in Thailand. It is the root of the problem." Those words, from Thai student activist Juthatip Sirikan, are a clear expression of the growing youth-led movement that is challenging the legitimacy of the government and demanding deep political changes in the Southeast Asian nation. Yet those very same words could also send Sirikan to jail.
Thailand's Criminal Code 'Lèse-Majesté' Article 112 imposes jail terms for defaming, insulting, or threatening the monarchy, with sentences of three to 15 years. This law has been present in Thai politics since 1908, though applied sparingly, only when direct verbal or written attacks against members of the royal family.
But after the May 2014 military coup d'état, Thailand experienced the first wave of lèse-majesté arrests, prosecutions, and detentions of at least 127 individuals arrested in a much wider interpretation of the law.
The recent report 'Second Wave: The Return of Lèse-Majesté in Thailand', documents how the Thai government has "used and abused Article 112 of the Criminal Code to target pro-democracy activists and protesters in relation to their online political expression and participation in peaceful pro-democracy demonstrations."
Criticism of any 'royal project'
The investigation shows 124 individuals, including at least eight minors, have been charged with lèse-majesté between November 2020 and August 2021. Nineteen of them served jail time. The new wave of charges is cited as a response to the rising pro-democracy protests across Thailand over the past year.
Juthatip Sirikan explains that the law is now being applied in such a broad way that people are not allowed to question government budgets and expenditure if they have any relationship with the royal family, which stifles criticism of the most basic government decision-making since there are an estimated 5,000 ongoing "royal" projects. "Article 112 of lèse-majesté could be the key (factor) in Thailand's political problems" the young activist argues.
In 2020 the Move Forward opposition party questioned royal spending paid by government departments, including nearly 3 billion baht (89,874,174 USD) from the Defense Ministry and Thai police for royal security, and 7 billion baht budgeted for royal development projects, as well as 38 planes and helicopters for the monarchy. Previously, on June 16, 2018, it was revealed that Thailand's Crown Property Bureau transferred its entire portfolio to the new King Maha Vajiralongkorn.
Protestors In Bangkok Call For Political Prisoner Release
Freedom of speech at stake
"Article 112 shuts down all freedom of speech in this country", says Sirikan. "Even the political parties fear to touch the subject, so it blocks most things. This country cannot move anywhere if we still have this law."
The student activist herself was charged with lèse-majesté in September 2020, after simply citing a list of public documents that refer to royal family expenditure. Sirikan comes from a family that has faced the consequences of decades of political repression. Her grandfather, Tiang Sirikhan was a journalist and politician who openly protested against Thailand's involvement in World War II. He was accused of being a Communist and abducted in 1952. According to Sirikhan's family, he was killed by the state.
The new report was conducted by The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Thai Lawyer for Human Rights (TLHR), and Internet Law Reform Dialogue (iLaw). It accuses Thai authorities of an increasingly broad interpretation of Article 112, to the point of "absurdity," including charges against people for criticizing the government's COVID-19 vaccine management, wearing crop tops, insulting the previous monarch, or quoting a United Nations statement about Article 112.
Juthatip Sirikan speaks in front of democracy monument.
Shift to social media
While in the past the Article was only used against people who spoke about the royals, it's now being used as an alibi for more general political repression — which has also spurred more open campaigning to abolish it. Sirikan recounts recent cases of police charging people for spreading paint near the picture of the king during a protest, or even just for having a picture of the king as phone wallpaper.
The more than a century-old law is now largely playing out online, where much of today's protest takes place in Thailand. Sirikan says people are willing to go further on social media to expose information such as how the king intervenes in politics and the monarchy's accumulation of wealth, information the mainstream media rarely reports on them.
Not surprisingly, however, social media is heavily monitored and the military is involved in Intelligence operations and cyber attacks against human rights defenders and critics of any kind. In October 2020, Twitter took down 926 accounts, linked to the army and the government, which promoted themselves and attacked political opposition, and this June, Google removed two Maps with pictures, names, and addresses, of more than 400 people who were accused of insulting the Thai monarchy. "They are trying to control the internet as well," Sirikan says. "They are trying to censor every content that they find a threat".
From Your Site Articles
- Long Shielded, Thailand's Monarchy Facing Hard Questions Amid ... ›
- French Monarchist Lessons For A Broken American Democracy ... ›
- Thailand To Belarus: The Divides Of Democracy Protesters ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!