When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


The Heart Can Mend Itself, A New Hope For Cardiac Research

Like brain cells, those of the heart were long thought unable to regenerate. Science is showing this to be false, though applying treatment accordingly is still in its infancy.

Illustration: Nicolas Raymond
Illustration: Nicolas Raymond
Gianna Milano

MILAN — Dr. Giulio Pompilio credits stem cell research for overturning a long-held belief about the heart.

The cardiovascular surgeon, who heads the Vascular Biology and Regenerative Medicine Unit at Milan’s Monzino Cardiology Center, says the heart is equipped with self-regenerating capabilities, a fact that holds great potential for treating cardiac problems.

“We used to think the same thing about the brain, but today we know that’s not true," says Pompilio. “The idea that the cells in our hearts were only able to increase in volume and length, but not reproduce and change, has now been proven wrong.”

The old theory was first thrown into doubt in the 1990s when studies suggested that the heart has intrinsic regenerative capabilities, and there were several isolated observations of cells seen dividing after heart attacks, as well as in pathological conditions.

“The scientific community was so set on the idea that the heart couldn’t repair itself that experimental research used stem cells from other parts of the body, including the spine and musculoskeletal system,” the surgeon explains.

Stem cells are present in almost every organ in our bodies, including the heart, so the main question is this: Why are our hearts unable to cope alone with diseases that weaken it? Why does scar tissue form after a heart attack instead of new healthy cells?

“Today we know that there are progenitor cells in the heart, but we don’t have a clear understanding of the precursory hierarchy of those muscular tissues,” Pompilio says. “By ‘hierarchy’ I mean the ability to specify where these cells come from. The heart, in all conditions, has a "turnover," that is, a mechanism for renewing cells.”

Proof came from a study in 2009, when researchers at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm showed that cardiac cells did, in fact, renew — albeit slowly. Taking advantage of the knowledge of the levels of radioactivity that were the consequence of nuclear tests begun in the 1950s, the researchers discovered that the disparity of radioactivity observed in the atmosphere and in the heart were due to cardiac cells’ ability to regenerate. It’s a limited change, however, with a 25-year-old estimated to be able to change by 1% annually.

“By the time we’re 70, almost half of the cells in our heart have been replaced by new ones. It’s a slow process but it’s continuous,” Pompilio says.

The discovery inevitably has led to other questions about development during embryonic and fetal stages as well. For example, at what stage exactly does the heart’s development stop?

There are plenty of questions that still need answers in order to lead to possible treatments. “We know that in the early stages of fetal development, as well as post-natal, the capability of regeneration is very high,” says Pompilio. “Within the first few weeks of life, a baby’s heart is much more malleable than an adult’s — there are probably molecular switches that are turned off in the post-natal stage.”

Molecular switches are, therefore, a key element. “Heart failure slightly increases the frequency of the change in an attempt to adapt to the critical situation, but it cannot cope with the problem entirely.” So now, the clinical goal is clear: increase this inadequate response.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


In Northern Kenya, Where Climate Change Is Measured In Starving Children

The worst drought in 40 years, which has deepened from the effects of climate change, is hitting the young the hardest around the Horn of Africa. A close-up look at the victims, and attempts to save lives and limit lasting effects on an already fragile region in Kenya.

Photo of five mothers holding their malnourished children

At feeding time, nurses and aides encourage mothers to socialize their children and stimulate them to eat.

Georgina Gustin

KAKUMA — The words "Stabilization Ward" are painted in uneven black letters above the entrance, but everyone in this massive refugee camp in Kakuma, Kenya, calls it ya maziwa: The place of milk.

Rescue workers and doctors, mothers and fathers, have carried hundreds of starving children through the doors of this one-room hospital wing, which is sometimes so crowded that babies and toddlers have to share beds. A pediatric unit is only a few steps away, but malnourished children don’t go there. They need special care, and even that doesn’t always save them.

In an office of the International Rescue Committee nearby, Vincent Opinya sits behind a desk with figures on dry-erase boards and a map of the camp on the walls around him. “We’ve lost 45 children this year due to malnutrition,” he says, juggling emergencies, phone calls, and texts. “We’re seeing a significant increase in malnutrition cases as a result of the drought — the worst we’ve faced in 40 years.”

From January to June, the ward experienced an 800 percent rise in admissions of children under 5 who needed treatment for malnourishment — a surge that aid groups blame mostly on a climate change-fueled drought that has turned the region into a parched barren.

Opinya, the nutrition manager for the IRC here, has had to rattle off these statistics many times, but the reality of the numbers is starting to crack his professional armor. “It’s a very sad situation,” he says, wearily. And he believes it will only get worse. A third year of drought is likely on the way.

More children may die. But millions will survive malnutrition and hunger only to live through a compromised future, researchers say. The longer-term health effects of this drought — weakened immune systems, developmental problems — will persist for a generation or more, with consequences that will cascade into communities and societies for decades.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest