When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Ours Is The Age Of Plastic, And It Needs To End

The legacy of our time will not be our literary or architectural monuments, but all the plastic trash we leave to poison the seas and choke our future. Fortunately, change is in the air.

Crumpled plastic bottle.
Crumpled plastic bottle.
César Rodríguez Garavito


BOGOTA — What will survive of us is love, the poet Philip Larkin wrote in 1956. Little did the Englishman know that what would really survive us, plastic, was being invented as he wrote.

The calamitous trail of billions of plastic bags, bottles and containers used since Larkin's time runs so deep and wide, and is so lasting, that it would be no exaggeration to call ours the "Age of Plastic."

This is no metaphor or verbal formula. The International Commission on Stratigraphy has tasked 37 experts with determining whether or not we have entered a new geological age. The question is whether or not the Holocene, which began 11,700 years ago, has given way to the Anthropocene, the first age marked by profound changes to the earth provoked by one species, humans.

Scientists are slowly concluding that we are, indeed, creating (and destroying) a planet in our own likeness. They are placing the origins of the Anthropocene in the 1950s and estimate that traces of plastic — on rocks, in the sea, in the guts of fish and birds — will probably be our most visible footprint.

When viewing the fossils of the Anthropocene, scientists will not find remains of skyscrapers, books or monuments, but pieces of water bottles, shampoo tops and shreds of supermarket check-out bags. The geologists of tomorrow will scratch their heads trying to understand the voracity with which we consume and dispose of substances that take 500 to 1,000 years to decompose. They will read about the five great islands of trash floating in the oceans today, the gathering points of some eight million tons of synthetic material annually.

But they will also note how at some point, humans abandoned their addiction to plastic. When we stopped the nonsense of drinking bottled water when potable tap water was available. Or when supermarkets, shops and drugstores stopped bagging everything, even a single pack of gum, inside plastic. Or when we stopped serving food in styrofoam, another lasting, toxic material, itself carried in plastic bags!

This moment has already arrived in many countries and cities. And it hasn't come from such lukewarm measures as those recently decreed by Colombian Environment Minister Gabriel Vallejo, focused only on teaching, asking and advising people not to use bags. The changes came instead from orders outright banning the most harmful bags (the thin ones) and putting a price on the thicker ones to shift the costs of using plastic bags and packaging onto consumers. That is what the fee of 150 pesos (about 40 cents) proposed by Sen. Antonio Navarro Wolff of the Green Alliance would do. It deserves serious discussion and should be extended to styrofoam.

The age of unfettered plastic use is coming to an end in a good part of Europe, in countries like South Africa and China and in U.S. states like California, where there is a charge for bags. The same should happen in Colombia, so that our legacy to the future is more than just shredded bag remains from our friendly neighborhood supermarket.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

And If Ukraine's Fate Was In The Hands Of Republican Senators And Viktor Orban?

In the U.S., Republican senators called on to approve military aid to Kyiv are blackmailing the Biden administration on an unrelated matter. In Europe, French President Macron will be dining with the Hungarian Prime Minister, who has threatened to block aid to Ukraine as well.

photo of viktor orban walking into a room

Orban will play all his cards

Sergei Savostyanov/TASS via ZUMA
Pierre Haski


PARIS — Make no mistake: military aid to Ukraine is at risk. And to understand why, just take a look at the name of French President Emmanuel Macron’s dinner guest Thursday at the Elysée palace in Paris: Viktor Orban, Hungary’s Prime Minister, and Europe’s No. 1 troublemaker.

Orban is threatening to veto a new 50 billion euro aid package for Ukraine at a European Council meeting next week. He could also block Ukraine’s negotiations to enter the European Union, an important issue that has provided some hope for this war-torn country. These are votes on which the unanimity of the "27" EU member states is required.

But this is not the only obstacle in the path of Western aid: the United States is also immersed in a political psychodrama, of which Ukraine is the victim. A new $60 billion aid package from the Biden administration has stalled in Congress: Republicans are demanding legislation to shut down the border with Mexico to stop immigration.

What does this have to do with Ukraine? Nothing, besides legislative blackmail.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest