When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
LA STAMPA

Clean Trees In Naples: When Ecology Invades Mob Territory

Outside of Naples, researchers have turned land polluted by illegally-dumped chemicals into a living laboratory.

Planting trees in Giugliano
Planting trees in Giugliano
Filippo Femia

GIUGLIANO — Thousands of poplars run parallel, in neat rows. The sun illuminates their thin trunks. Looking at this wood of Giugliano, in the northern outskirts of Naples, it may seem impossible that the Camorra, the local mafia, poured polluting liquid waste from tanneries here. Yet tests have revealed the presence of chromium, zinc and cadmium, a heavy metal that is highly toxic to humans even in minimal concentrations.

This area was scarred for decades by Camorra clans and is at the center of what is known in Italy as the "Land of Fires', an area notorious for garbage fires that burn along the sides of public streets, in pastures and agricultural fields, and before public monuments. Most of this burning has been attributed to Camorra clans, who have for decades used the territory for illegal dumping of chemical waste as well as for managing dumps.

But the Giugliano area is slowly coming back to life thanks to a revolutionary research project by the University of Naples Federico II. The Campania-based project is called Ecoremed and is funded by the European Commission. It was launched in 2012 as a response to a legislative gap, the result of a 2006 decree that regulates the management of waste and the reclamation of polluted sites but excluded agricultural land, which was to be regulated by a later decree. The follow-up legislation was only signed at the end of 2017 and has never come into force.

Effective and affordable

The person behind the project is Massimo Fagnano, professor of agriculture at the Federico II University. He was looking for eco-friendly remediation techniques for polluted land, such as the illegal landfills in the Campania region. In a few months, his team of approximately 100 researchers (medical doctors, geologists, engineers, biologists and chemists) developed a new method using the phytoremediation technique.

The costs? Very high.

Trees — mainly poplars and eucalyptus — are planted to neutralize heavy metals. They absorb the metals, fixing them in the wood of the trunk and the roots and preventing the contaminants from reaching the water table. It is a technique that does not involve the use of chemicals. It also contributes to a circular economy: the wood can then be used as biomass to produce energy.

In the past, two main techniques were used to clean up soil from contaminants. In some cases, the soil was removed, as far down as the contamination went, and then taken to landfill and treated as special waste. The costs? Very high. The other option was to secure the area with a sort of cement cage that would stop the passage of polluting agents through the soil, and then build on it. The costs for this technique were also high: several million euros per hectare.

2012 fire in the Land of Fires area — Source: Associazione Culturale Voce per Tutti

"Ecoremed's solution provides a sustainable, low-cost and green alternative without destroying the soil. And it provides the population with a new ecosystem," says Fagnano.

Relatively speaking, it's a bargain. Costs are 10 times lower than with traditional techniques. "Profit has nothing to do with this technique," says Antonio Di Gennaro, an agronomist involved in the project. "The application manual for this technique is free and can be downloaded from our website. We hope the technique will be used in other cases too."

Leading by example

The new approach also has to do with the diagnosis. Analyzing the results of the different soil samples, the experts found out that the agricultural land was not as contaminated as originally believed. In reality, of the 33,000 hectares that make up the Land of Fires, only 33 hectares have been sealed off — a percentage close to zero.

At the beginning, many were skeptical about Massimo Fagnano's team. Then Ecoremed became a virtuous example in the region: a green laboratory that also has a social and cultural mission. Many schools go on trips to visit the reclaimed sites. Where there was degradation and a wounded ecosystem, now there is a stronghold of legality.

This is the lesson for our children.

"We show children that the population can regain possession of territories looted by the Camorra, interrupting the chain of illegality on forgotten farmland," explains Fagnano.

Other projects related to Ecoremed have turned some illegal landfills into parks or soccer fields, green spaces that are much needed but are too often replaced by illegal construction. "The wounds that our territory has suffered over time are not curses without remedy," says Di Gennaro. "They can be treated with competence, culture, and civilization, so that nothing similar happens again. This is the lesson for our children."

Ecoremed has worked in collaboration with the Department of Agriculture of the Campania Region, with the Campania region Environmental Protection Agency (ARPAC), and with Risorsa, a small research company. The breakthrough came in May 2018, when the European Commission picked Ecoremed as one of the nine most outstanding projects in the environmental field.

Now a memorandum of understanding is being discussed with Campania's regional reforms commission to extend the model to the rest of the region.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

Lex Tusk? How Poland’s Controversial "Russian Influence" Law Will Subvert Democracy

The new “lex Tusk” includes language about companies and their management. But is this likely to be a fair investigation into breaking sanctions on Russia, or a political witch-hunt in the business sphere?

Photo of President of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda

Polish President Andrzej Duda

Piotr Miaczynski, Leszek Kostrzewski

-Analysis-

WARSAW — Poland’s new Commission for investigating Russian influence, which President Andrzej Duda signed into law on Monday, will be able to summon representatives of any company for inquiry. It has sparked a major controversy in Polish politics, as political opponents of the government warn that the Commission has been given near absolute power to investigate and punish any citizen, business or organization.

And opposition politicians are expected to be high on the list of would-be suspects, starting with Donald Tusk, who is challenging the ruling PiS government to return to the presidency next fall. For that reason, it has been sardonically dubbed: Lex Tusk.

University of Warsaw law professor Michal Romanowski notes that the interests of any firm can be considered favorable to Russia. “These are instruments which the likes of Putin and Orban would not be ashamed of," Romanowski said.

The law on the Commission for examining Russian influences has "atomic" prerogatives sewn into it. Nine members of the Commission with the rank of secretary of state will be able to summon virtually anyone, with the powers of severe punishment.

Under the new law, these Commissioners will become arbiters of nearly absolute power, and will be able to use the resources of nearly any organ of the state, including the secret services, in order to demand access to every available document. They will be able to prosecute people for acts which were not prohibited at the time they were committed.

Their prerogatives are broader than that of the President or the Prime Minister, wider than those of any court. And there is virtually no oversight over their actions.

Nobody can feel safe. This includes companies, their management, lawyers, journalists, and trade unionists.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest