When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!
InterNations -Your expat community
The Jourit Al-Shayah neighborhood in Homs
The Jourit Al-Shayah neighborhood in Homs
Yazan al-Homsy*

HOMS — Five hundred and ten days have passed since the siege began in Homs, taking a toll on civilians and fighters alike.

Homs, dubbed “the capital of the revolution” by activists for its early role in the revolt, has since been two-thirds destroyed by air raids and shelling.

The mass protests that broke out in March 2011 were met with deadly military force, prompting the formation of local units of the rebel Free Syrian Army. Regime forces have worked since to quell the local rebellion; for the past year and a half, 14 neighborhoods have lived under a grinding siege with no goods entering or exiting the city.

Hundreds of thousands of mortars have destroyed Homs, forever changing its once familiar face. Here, darkness reigns once the sun sets. Diesel fuel reserves have long been depleted after they were used to power generators. Now electricity is only used in emergencies: in field hospitals or to power surveillance cameras on the front lines.

The dearth of drinking water is severe, as are the cuts in electricity. For those under siege, water used to be extracted from home wells using small generators, but this is no longer an option. Today, residents manually fill buckets, the only available solution to deliver water to those who need it within the neighborhood.

Reem, Hiba and Yamama start every morning by delivering water buckets to their homes using baby strollers. The eldest among the three girls just turned 10. There is no school. Despite their obligation to do manual chores, they are still children. Yamama still sings lullabies while delivering water in her old baby stroller.

After the cats, what next?

Residents of the besieged neighborhoods have grown used to the scarcity of food. A little bit of wheat, flour, rice, bulgur or lentils is enough for one’s daily meal, to live another day through siege. But as the long months have passed, foodstuffs have become harder to come by. Those found in abandoned houses within the siege parameter have run out, and there are no more alternatives. One’s daily meal now requires a lot of effort, searching in places that have not been reached before. The lucky ones are those who find some rice.

Basic supplies range from scarce to nonexistent. This only becomes worse with the harsh winter and the spread of rodents. Meanwhile, the daily shelling continues. Regime forces and loyalist militias have not relented in their bid to tighten the noose on the siege, retaking Khaldiyeh district three months ago.

Diseases caused by malnutrition and low immunity have spread among those living under siege. Anemia, jaundice, intestinal infections and chronic fatigue have settled in alongside the wounds caused by daily fighting and random shelling that now take longer to heal due to the lack of medication and proper nutrition. Complications frequently arise, sometimes causing permanent damage to the patient.

Giving birth under siege is a risk, not only due to the daily realities of shelling and hunger, but even the lack of hospital facilities. Two premature babies have died because there were no hospitals available to care for them. Those newborns destined to survive begin their lives under siege, and are fed milled rice flour instead of mother’s milk or baby formula, as both are unavailable.

Abu Ahmad, who works in one of the field hospitals, describes the agony of the medical staff: “You can’t do anything. A premature baby needs an incubator, and there is none. All we can do is wait for him to die as we watch his parents suffer.”

Mulberry leaves, dry bread, bran, barley flour and expired foodstuffs have all become part of the diet of those under siege. In exceptional cases, some sheikhs allowed the residents of besieged eastern Ghouta in Damascus to eat cats. The only difference between eastern Ghouta and Homs is that the latter has been under siege longer.

Many never considered eating cats, even in worst-case scenarios. No one thought the land would no longer be able to feed its people. Cats had always been kept as pets, our domestic companions in the city, but today, they could possibly be the next meal if the situation keeps worsening.

300 Families, Hundreds Wounded and Deafening Silence

Over 300 families live under the siege, including 200 individuals who have been permanently disabled due to injuries sustained in fighting or shelling. They fight to stay alive under horrendous living conditions that seems light years from 21st-century civilization. This siege is probably the longest known of a city engulfed by war.

Amer, a young man, said: “Never have I imagined that the cats I used to take care of when I was a child would become a meal to residents under siege.”

He now tries to think of ways to help the cats from his childhood so they do not end up on the menu of one of the besieged residents.

Those at the helm inside the besieged neighborhoods are constantly trying to brainstorm ways to meet the residents’ basic needs, find a way to evacuate the wounded and families, and provide safe routes to deliver aid, be it food or medicine. Over the last year and a half, pleas to international humanitarian organizations to help the besieged civilians have so far fallen on deaf ears.

Children wishing to enjoy a piece of candy or fruit; the elderly wanting to visit their grandchildren; a young man longing to reunite with his parents; and men hoping to see their wives and children again are simple wishes that fall within the scope of one’s basic human rights, but the silence of the world is mind-boggling. All the things international humanitarian and legal organizations call for, especially when it comes to said basic human rights, have become void slogans with the siege that has now been going on for a year and a half.

*Translated by Naziha Baassiri

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in
Green

Good COP, Bad COP? How Sharm El-Sheik Failed On The Planet's Big Question

The week-long climate summit in Egypt managed to a backsliding that looked possible at some point, it still failed to deliver on significant change to reverse the effects of global warming.

Photo of a potted tree lying overturned on the ground in Sharm el-Sheikh as the COP27 summit concludes.

A potted tree lies overturned on the ground in Sharm el-Sheikh as the COP27 summit concludes.

Matt McDonald*

For 30 years, developing nations have fought to establish an international fund to pay for the “loss and damage” they suffer as a result of climate change. As the COP27 climate summit in Egypt wrapped up over the weekend, they finally succeeded.

While it’s a historic moment, the agreement of loss and damage financing left many details yet to be sorted out. What’s more, many critics have lamented the overall outcome of COP27, saying it falls well short of a sufficient response to the climate crisis. As Alok Sharma, president of COP26 in Glasgow, noted:

"Friends, I said in Glasgow that the pulse of 1.5 °C was weak. Unfortunately it remains on life support."

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in

The latest

InterNations