When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
eyes on the U.S.

With Venezuela, Washington Is Back To Old Tricks In Latin America

Obama's executive order slapping sanctions on Venezuelan officials is ostensibly in defense of liberty. But it could just as well be another of a long line of aggressive American interventions.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro U.S. President Barack Obama in 2012
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro U.S. President Barack Obama in 2012
Óscar Guardiola-Rivera


BOGOTA — I remember the United States' invasion of Panama in 1989. I was barely out of my teens when very early on Dec. 20, American troops bombed Panama's airports and army bases. I felt real, visceral pain.

"Smartbombing" civilian buildings, 26,000 troops of the 82nd Airborne Division of the world's most powerful military faced 12,000 badly equipped defensive forces of that little republic, which long ago had been Colombian territory.

The impoverished district of El Chorrillo suffered the worst of the violence. Is this more acceptable than forcing the rich to part with their wealth? I listened to live radio broadcasts of the progression of Operation "Just Cause," dubbed as such in a bid to confound with two words the basic evidence of facts.

Just Cause? Antonio Noriega, Panama's ruler, was indefensible as a dictator and drug trafficker. As President George H. W. Bush said at the time, the operation was about defending democracy and human rights.

The only problem was that the same Noriega had been a close collaborator of the intelligence agency Mr. Bush used to run. There is a picture on the Internet, showing a very jovial-looking Noriega seated on a sofa with a friendly Vice President Bush, during the Reagan years.

Don't trust the people

Until February 1988, Noriega had been on the CIA payroll. What could the two chums have been talking about when that photo was taken? Perhaps about the time when Noriega allowed the U.S. to use drug money of the Medellín cartel to buy weapons for the Contras in Nicaragua. That, of course, was when President Reagan was defending another "just cause," i.e. toppling the leftist Sandinistas.

Before Reagan, there were Kissinger and Nixon, who could not look the other way and let an "irresponsible" people vote in a communist country. Nixon begat Reagan, who begat the first Bush — who sired the second Bush. His administration backed the attempted coup in 2002 against Hugo Chávez.

And now, President Barack Obama follows their trail as he declares Venezuela's socialist government to be a threat to U.S. national security. This is as senseless as banning the term "global warming" in Florida, which the third Bush (former governor of the Sunshine State, and future presidential candidate, Jeb) and his successors appear to have done.

Like them, Obama has invoked democracy and human rights. And as in the past, our most progressive intellectuals will say that talking of coups is an exaggeration. That the Venezuelan government was asking for it by jailing opponents, violating property rights and attacking free speech, even financing Spain's leftist Podemos party.

All of it taken together justifies the executive order — though at the end of the day, the irresponsible Venezuelans are to blame, for having voted in a communist!

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

A Profound And Simple Reason That Negotiations Are Not An Option For Ukraine

The escalation of war in the Middle East and the stagnation of the Ukrainian counteroffensive have left many leaders in the West, who once supported Ukraine unequivocally, to look toward ceasefire talks with Russia. For Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza, Piotr Andrusieczko argues that Ukraine simply cannot afford this.

Photo of Ukrainian soldiers in winter gear, marching behind a tank in a snowy landscape

Ukrainian soldiers ploughing through the snow on the frontlines

Volodymyr Zelensky's official Facebook account
Piotr Andrusieczko


KYIVUkraine is fighting for its very existence, and the war will not end soon. What should be done in the face of this reality? How can Kyiv regain its advantage on the front lines?

It's hard to deny that pessimism has been spreading among supporters of the Ukrainian cause, with some even predicting ultimate defeat for Kyiv. It's difficult to agree with this, considering how this war began and what was at stake. Yes, Ukraine has not won yet, but Ukrainians have no choice for now but to continue fighting.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

These assessments are the result of statements by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, General Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, and an interview with him in the British weekly The Economist, where the General analyzes the causes of failures on the front, notes the transition of the war to the positional phase, and, critically, evaluates the prospects and possibilities of breaking the deadlock.

Earlier, an article appeared in the American weekly TIME analyzing the challenges facing President Volodymyr Zelensky. His responses indicate that he is disappointed with the attitude of Western partners, and at the same time remains so determined that, somewhat lying to himself, he unequivocally believes in victory.

Combined, these two publications sparked discussions about the future course of the conflict and whether Ukraine can win at all.

Some people outright predict that what has been known from the beginning will happen: Russia will ultimately win, and Ukraine has already failed.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest