ISTANBUL — On one hand, there is an investigation of an imaginary terrorist organization and the claim of a wiretapping list that includes some 7,000 people.
On the other, there is the recording of a telephone conversation that has been spreading on YouTube, allegedly between Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his son.
The prosecutors who were said to be running the investigation around the first claim say, “No, we did not wiretap this many people.” The prime minister, meanwhile, denies the second claim, calling the recording a “montage.”
From my vantage point, it looks like such accusations are no longer made to actually be proven. Instead, they’re being discussed just for the sake of preaching to the already converted, while the rest are already sworn not to believe whatever comes from the enemy camp anyway.
This is the way we deal with each other in today's polarized Turkey.
By now, we would be better off looking beyond the specific content of all such claims. Can it be anything but the country’s bad governance that turns citizens into mere spectators in a dirty political war?
A well-governed country would have been able to overcome its systemic problems in the decade-plus that the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has been in power. The existence of such wiretapping wars are proof that the problems of 1999 still continue in 2014, that no steps were taken to solve them.
Isn’t there anybody in Turkey ready to question the very existence of such a wiretapping war between political opponents? Why don’t we see such a form of corruption in Germany, France, the United States? Or even in Italy and Greece?
More than elections
It is a kind of political law of physics: A country’s level of wiretapping wars is inversely proportional to its democratic accountability.
Some of us still think democratic accountability is nothing more than elections held every four years.
The parliament is meant to hold government to account above all, as well as overseeing the moves of the country’s administrative body, forcing both to act within the boundaries of the law.
This supervision is supposed to include the security bureaucracy the most: the military, police, intelligence agencies. But alas, our parliamentary system doesn’t fulfill this role adequately because the parliament is under the government’s supervision.
In countries where democratic accountability exists, technical issues are under the supervision of independent institutions that are entrusted to handle them free of any partisanship.
In Turkey, the independent institutions are independent in name only.
Democratic accountability should mean that the judiciary rarely is forced to hold politicians to account. This exceptional status is instead almost the norm in Turkey.
Then there is the media, the last link in this accountability chain. We still manage to have some independent media left in Turkey, but when that ends we will have a fine country with zero accountability for the government at all.
Inevitably it comes back around to the citizens and voters of the Turkish democracy. With local elections set for March 30, polls show that the electorate is both polarized and apathetic.
Worse, while the number of undecided voters is low, those considering not voting at all is on the rise.
A court in Spain usurps custody of the one-year-old boy living with his mother in the "deep" part of the Galicia region, forced to instead live with his father in the southern city of Marbella, which the judge says is "cosmopolitan" with good schools and medical care. Women's rights groups have taken up the mother's case.
A Spanish court has ordered the withdrawal of a mother's custody of her one-year-old boy because she is living in the countryside in northwestern Spain, where the judge says the child won't have "opportunities for the proper development of his personality."
The case, reported Monday in La Voz de Galicia, has sparked outrage from a women's rights association but has also set off reactions from politicians of different stripes across the province of Galicia, defending the values of rural life.
Judge María Belén Ureña Carazo, of the family court of Marbella, a city on the southern coast of 141,000 people, has ordered the toddler to stay with father who lives in the city rather than with his mother because she was living in "deep Galicia" where the child would lack opportunities to "grow up in a happy environment."
Front page of La Voz de Galicia - October 25, 2021
Front page of La Voz de Galicia - Monday 25 October, 2021
Better in a "cosmopolitan" city?
The judge said Marbella, where the father lives, was a "cosmopolitan city" with "a good hospital" as well as "all kinds of schools" and thus provided a better environment for the child to thrive.
The mother has submitted a formal complaint to the General Council of the Judiciary that the family court magistrate had acted with "absolute contempt," her lawyer told La Voz de Galicia.
The mother quickly accumulated support from local politicians and civic organizations. The Clara Campoamor association described the judge's arguments as offensive, intolerable and typical of "an ignorant person who has not traveled much."
The Xunta de Galicia, the regional government, has addressed the case, saying that any place in Galicia meets the conditions to educate a minor. The Socialist party politician Pablo Arangüena tweeted that "it would not hurt part of the judiciary to spend a summer in Galicia."
- What Kind Of Parenting Turns Kids Into Targets For Bullying ... ›
- The Problem With China's Parents-Know-Best Mentality - Worldcrunch ›
- Orsoni Affair: A Family Saga In The Corsican Underworld ... ›