When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Ideas

Netflix Stereotype? A Real Ukrainian In Paris Sets The Record Straight

Ukraine's culture minister has attempted to make a bonafide diplomatic incident out of the depiction of a character from Kyiv in the vapid Netflix series "Emily in Paris." A native Kyiv writer based in France is outraged too, but at her own country's false pride and a government minister wasting everyone's time.

Netflix Stereotype? A Real Ukrainian In Paris Sets The Record Straight

Real Ukrainian in real Ukraine

Anna Akage

-Essay-

PARIS — So Ukraine’s Minister of Culture Oleksandr Tkachenko has written a letter to Netflix, expressing the outrage that he and his fellow Ukrainians feel about the ugly stereotypes of a character from Kyiv who recently appeared in the Netflix series Emily in Paris. As a Ukrainian in Paris, I have a letter for Minister Tkachenko…


Let's start with the fact that you should not only first watch the show, which has already been widely discussed for its stereotypes about French and Americans, Paris and baguettes with berets. But watch it very carefully. Take your time, which you apparently have plenty of.

The pettiness of Ukraine's civil servants

Against the backdrop of the nightmarish outfits and cheesy acting of the main character, it's hard to notice anything else at all. I would write more on this if I were a fashion blogger or entertainment critic, but that’s not my job. And yours?

Further, the cabinet minister makes a fundamental mistake when he speaks of this "unacceptable stereotype." If Netflix had wanted to portray a truly stereotypical Ukrainian, the show would have featured a hot brunette with silicone lips, 4D lashes and a Turkish boyfriend — not a pathetic thief in a shiny beanie. Who in Kyiv wears such a thing? Knowing the stereotypes of their fellow citizens should definitely be part of the job of the Minister of Culture! I myself would write like the native Kievan that I am, but don't I have better things to do?

The Ukrainian minister clearly does not. And this letter of his to a multinational tech and film company is worse than all the Ukrainian characters in all the trashy soap operas, because nothing embarrasses Ukraine more than the pettiness of its civil servants. The Minister's letter is a testimony of parochialism and provincialism, with its echoes of the Soviet era when it was customary to filter all the world's media in the hope of seeing or hearing something about one's own country. As if only a passing mention in foreign media makes us legitimate, real.

Lily Collins as Emily with Daria Panchenko as her Ukrainian friend Petra

Stéphanie Branchu/Netflix

Real people have real concerns

Did you know, for example, that a Ukrainian NGO, funded by an international donor organization, wrote an in-depth report that a certain kind of soup is Ukrainian, and not Russian — and that all who write or say otherwise are enemies, provocateurs and fascists?

It was also a Ukrainian who designed the first rocket, won every boxing belt, invented gunpowder, built pyramids and may have actually flipped the switch on the big bang. As if this Ukrainian-Ukrainian, the most important and the best and the most advanced, has anything to do with how millions of real Ukrainians live in real Ukraine.

My sister works in Kyiv as a surgical assistant, and stands through 10-hour neurosurgeries for 400 euros a month — even if prices in Kyiv supermarkets are similar to those in Paris. She hasn't seen a single episode of Emily in Paris, Monsieur Culture Minister. She doesn't have the time.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

Lex Tusk? How Poland’s Controversial "Russian Influence" Law Will Subvert Democracy

The new “lex Tusk” includes language about companies and their management. But is this likely to be a fair investigation into breaking sanctions on Russia, or a political witch-hunt in the business sphere?

Photo of President of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda

Polish President Andrzej Duda

Piotr Miaczynski, Leszek Kostrzewski

-Analysis-

WARSAW — Poland’s new Commission for investigating Russian influence, which President Andrzej Duda signed into law on Monday, will be able to summon representatives of any company for inquiry. It has sparked a major controversy in Polish politics, as political opponents of the government warn that the Commission has been given near absolute power to investigate and punish any citizen, business or organization.

And opposition politicians are expected to be high on the list of would-be suspects, starting with Donald Tusk, who is challenging the ruling PiS government to return to the presidency next fall. For that reason, it has been sardonically dubbed: Lex Tusk.

University of Warsaw law professor Michal Romanowski notes that the interests of any firm can be considered favorable to Russia. “These are instruments which the likes of Putin and Orban would not be ashamed of," Romanowski said.

The law on the Commission for examining Russian influences has "atomic" prerogatives sewn into it. Nine members of the Commission with the rank of secretary of state will be able to summon virtually anyone, with the powers of severe punishment.

Under the new law, these Commissioners will become arbiters of nearly absolute power, and will be able to use the resources of nearly any organ of the state, including the secret services, in order to demand access to every available document. They will be able to prosecute people for acts which were not prohibited at the time they were committed.

Their prerogatives are broader than that of the President or the Prime Minister, wider than those of any court. And there is virtually no oversight over their actions.

Nobody can feel safe. This includes companies, their management, lawyers, journalists, and trade unionists.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest