When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


The Dangerous Fallacy That There Is No 'Bad Islam'

Yes, it's a minority, but too many Muslims offer religious justification for violence and subjugation – and we must be free to criticize Islam's dark side without being branded Islamophobes.

An ugly threat at an Islamic rally in Sydney
An ugly threat at an Islamic rally in Sydney
Oliver Jeges


BERLIN — Everything has its flip side. A Wiener Schnitzel tastes delicious, but it's bad for your health. The Internet brought us unlimited access to information and cute cat videos, but also introduced us to online trolls and cyberbullying. And religion is not exception.

History has long taught us that both good and bad acts are committed in the name of God. The Bible itself is a contradiction, calling as it does to love thy neighbor even as it tolerates slavery. And at the Vatican, we know the mixed record through the ages of the supposedly infallible popes.

Terror in one form or another has played, and in some cases continues to play, a role in nearly all religions. There was Christian terror, as in the era of the Crusades, and Jewish terror such as that perpetrated by the underground organization Irgun at the time of the founding of the Israeli state. There's Hindu terror such as the 2002 mass murder of Muslims in Gujarat, India. Although it's hard to believe, there has even been a recent spate of Buddhist terror — against the Muslim minority in Myanmar.

But there's one religion that, if its apologists are to be believed, doesn't have a dark side: Islam.

Not long ago I was a guest on a German talk show, where the subject was "Fear of Holy Warriors — Is Islam a Threat to Us, Too?" I was seated next to Khola Maryam Hübsch, a German Muslim and prominent author. On the couch across from us sat Aiman Mazyek, chair of the Central Council of Muslims in Germany. It only took a few minutes before one of the favorite rhetorical tricks of Islam was trotted out. "When I look at ISIS, it's a fanatical ideology that has nothing to do with Islam," Hübsch said.

On this occasion, Mazyek avoided the standard phrase "nothing to do with Islam" that he cites on frequent occasion, applying it to everyday phenomena or the international situation with equal ease. But as a representative of Islam in Germany, he declined any and all responsibility. Asked about the radicalization of young people and whether it's the duty of Muslim communities to prevent the young from drifting into fundamentalism, he replied that it was the duty of the security services and the police – that, in essence, it had nothing to do with Islam.

Then a German TV presenter, who is a convert to Islam and another guest on the talk show, piped in with yet another disclaimer: "What ISIS is doing has nothing to do with Islam." Why do so many Muslims appear on these talk shows when none of all this apparently has anything to do with their religion?

Playing the Islamaphobe card

That has nothing to do with Islam... What a comfortable shield. It's this reflex, of pushing everything away, that makes sensible discussion of the potential dangers of Islam impossible. Instead, anyone who criticizes conservative and radical Muslim elements is accused of suffering from a heavy case of "Islamophobia."

[rebelmouse-image 27088296 alt="""" original_size="450x325" expand=1]

A 2001 image of Taliban beating a woman who wasn't wearing a burqa. Photo: Rawa

If a passenger plane crashed every day somewhere in the world, it would be reasonable to have a fear of flying. That the majority of all planes land safely would be completely irrelevant and wouldn't reassure anyone. Whenever traveling on a plane, the fear of crashing would be constant. One plane a day! It could happen anywhere, at any time. But that's only make-believe.

With Islam, it actually works that way. There is no way to predict when and where the next attack will take place. Until a few weeks ago, we thought that countries like Australia and Canada were safe from Islamic terror, but we've been disabused of that notion. Every European city now has its own Salafist scene.

Is it really Islamophobic to criticize all this without having to add every time that of course the majority of Muslims are peace-loving? We don't have to praise airlines for being able to keep their jumbo jets aloft. So why should we applaud Muslims for sticking to basic laws? We should quite simply be able to take it for granted.

Modern society must allow us to find ideas and ideologies — whether communism or capitalism, vegetarianism or feminism, Christianity or Islam — bad, and to be able to criticize them without constraint. Our forefathers literally went through hell for hundreds of years so that we could enjoy this right of freedom of expression today. And now we're supposed to revise that because Muslims feel insulted?


When profound critics such as political scientist Hamed Abdel-Samad, sociologist Necla Kelek, politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali and neuroscientist Sam Harris are all dubbed "Islamophobes," then enlightenment voices such as Voltaire, Bertrand Russell and Sigmund Freud must have been "Christophobes."

Many Muslims believe that Islam is perfect and that only individual Muslims may not always be. If all the negative manifestations of Islam — terror attacks, honor killings, genital mutilation, forced marriages and ISIS — have nothing to do with an otherwise perfect religion, then any defeat of Bayern Munich has nothing to do with the otherwise perfect soccer club.

[rebelmouse-image 27088297 alt="""" original_size="640x853" expand=1]

Anwar al-Awlaki was an imam and a terrorist before he was killed in 2011.

If we were to apply an artificial separation line to all things like the one we put between Islam and Islamism, the results would be very interesting. Global warming would have nothing to do with climate change, the economic crisis nothing to do with capitalism, and the Left nothing to do with the Socialist Unity Party.

If Ayatollah Khomeini could refer to an unveiled woman as an "Islamophobe," then any enlightened humanist in the here and now has to be one too. That's right: every women's rights activist, every critic of totalitarianism, every anti-fascist, every human rights advocate and apostle of peace.

The idea that good Islam means peace, and that there's no bad Islam, exposes many of the official representatives of Islam as impostors and deceivers. As long as the Islamic world remains indecisive, ambiguous and keeps up this wait-and-see attitude towards radical tendencies, as long as it won't admit that Islam has a warring-political side, the problem is one that concerns all of Islam. And until that stops, we need not feel guilty about making an association between Islam and Islamism.

To paraphrase the words of Aiman Mazyek, this has nothing to do with Islamophobia. We call it being enlightened.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


What's Spoiling The Kids: The Big Tech v. Bad Parenting Debate

Without an extended family network, modern parents have sought to raise happy kids in a "hostile" world. It's a tall order, when youngsters absorb the fears (and devices) around them like a sponge.

Image of a kid wearing a blue striped sweater, using an ipad.

Children exposed to technology at a very young age are prominent today.

Julián de Zubiría Samper


BOGOTÁ — A 2021 report from the United States (the Youth Risk Behavior Survey) found that 42% of the country's high-school students persistently felt sad and 22% had thought about suicide. In other words, almost half of the country's young people are living in despair and a fifth of them have thought about killing themselves.

Such chilling figures are unprecedented in history. Many have suggested that this might be the result of the COVID-19 pandemic, but sadly, we can see depression has deeper causes, and the pandemic merely illustrated its complexity.

I have written before on possible links between severe depression and the time young people spend on social media. But this is just one aspect of the problem. Today, young people suffer frequent and intense emotional crises, and not just for all the hours spent staring at a screen. Another, possibly more important cause may lie in changes to the family composition and authority patterns at home.

Firstly: Families today have fewer members, who communicate less among themselves.

Young people marry at a later age, have fewer children and many opt for personal projects and pets instead of having children. Families are more diverse and flexible. In many countries, the number of children per woman is close to or less than one (Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong among others).

In Colombia, women have on average 1.9 children, compared to 7.6 in 1970. Worldwide, women aged 15 to 49 years have on average 2.4 children, or half the average figure for 1970. The changes are much more pronounced in cities and among middle and upper-income groups.

Of further concern today is the decline in communication time at home, notably between parents and children. This is difficult to quantify, but reasons may include fewer household members, pervasive use of screens, mothers going to work, microwave ovens that have eliminated family cooking and meals and, thanks to new technologies, an increase in time spent on work, even at home. Our society is addicted to work and devotes little time to minors.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest