When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!
InterNations -Your expat community
Israel

Leadership-By-Paranoia, Why Netanyahu Must Go

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has done great harm to Israel's reputation, and the early elections he's called for March are a perfect chance to end his hold on the nation.

Netanyahu on Dec. 3
Netanyahu on Dec. 3
Yoel Esteron

-OpEd-

TEL AVIV — Benjamin Netanyahu isn't singularly to blame for the turmoil within Israeli government, but he is the prime minister. Thirty years ago, Prime Minister Menachem Begin was diagnosed with clinical depression, which was hidden from the public until he was simply unable to carry on.

Instead, today, nobody is trying to hide Bibi Netanyahu's paranoia. It can be felt in each one of his statements. And sadly, his advisors and others surrounding him cultivate it without shame. Bibi is good for Jews! Paranoia is good for Jews! It might even become a campaign slogan.

Netanyahu's ministers have been saying for a while now that their leader has lost his way — and his senses. And not just ministers from the coalition: key figures from Netanyahu's Likud party are saying very harsh things about their prime minister in conversations that weren't meant to be published.

Even senior government officials in his office are very concerned. There are no longer talks about the very well-known problem of his wife Sara Netanyahu, who has been sued for abusive behavior toward her housekeeper and a former family bodyguard. The problem now is Bibi himself. Those who have resigned from his office and his party have not yet shared their disillusionment with the public. Maybe it's time for that, because it would be a betrayal of the people's trust to remain silent.

Netanyahu must go

All the political commentators are chattering about why the elections that Netanyahu has called early, for March, are completely pointless, bemoaning the fact that they will cost millions of dollars to execute. But I disagree. The 2015 elections are essential for Israel's future. They will probably be mostly anti-Netanyahu, but if it is the will of the people, let them remove a prime minister who is dragging down the country.

Netanyahu has destroyed the special relations Israel previously enjoyed with the United States, isolated Israel internationally, blocked every chance of reconciliation with moderate Mideast actors, sabotaged any economic reform, and ruined any chance of improving life for Israeli workers and taxpayers. Now, in a pathetic attempt to make everybody forget who has led and directed the government, he blames his ministers for failing.

Netanyahu is convinced that he was chosen to save the country and should therefore keep his position forever. He will never say, "I can't do this anymore."

Therefore, it is we who should send him home in the next election. Let him fly around the world to speak at conferences. This isn't about the political left or right. Both sides are equally legitimate. Even the right-wing Likud party deserves better than Netanyahu. There are excellent people in the Likud, and if one of them becomes a candidate, so be it. Let him be prime minister. But Netanyahu must go.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in
Green

Good COP, Bad COP? How Sharm El-Sheik Failed On The Planet's Big Question

The week-long climate summit in Egypt managed to a backsliding that looked possible at some point, it still failed to deliver on significant change to reverse the effects of global warming.

Photo of a potted tree lying overturned on the ground in Sharm el-Sheikh as the COP27 summit concludes.

A potted tree lies overturned on the ground in Sharm el-Sheikh as the COP27 summit concludes.

Matt McDonald*

For 30 years, developing nations have fought to establish an international fund to pay for the “loss and damage” they suffer as a result of climate change. As the COP27 climate summit in Egypt wrapped up over the weekend, they finally succeeded.

While it’s a historic moment, the agreement of loss and damage financing left many details yet to be sorted out. What’s more, many critics have lamented the overall outcome of COP27, saying it falls well short of a sufficient response to the climate crisis. As Alok Sharma, president of COP26 in Glasgow, noted:

"Friends, I said in Glasgow that the pulse of 1.5 °C was weak. Unfortunately it remains on life support."

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in

The latest

InterNations