When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

China's Lynch-Mob Justice? Even Baby-Killers Deserve Their Day In Court

Zhou Xijun's case has sparked public outrage in China
Zhou Xijun's case has sparked public outrage in China
Yang Tao


BEIJING - A few days ago in the northeastern city of Changchun, a man left his baby in his SUV while he went inside a convenience store. He returned to find his car, which he had left unlocked and running, stolen, along with the baby.

After 48 hours of public mobilization and searches, Zhou Xijun, 48, surrendered to police. He admitted that he had strangled the baby after hearing him crying in the back of the SUV. He then buried the baby's body in the snow by the roadside.

When news of the terrible crime became public, there was an enormous outcry on the Internet. Many netizens, including celebrities who are known for usually being quite moderate, were furious.

"He is not a human, he is a monster! We do not recognize that he turned himself in to the police!" wrote one celebrity.

A TV commentator said: "We believe that justice will punish this criminal severely. If he is ultimately sentenced to death I hope his execution will be by firing squad. Lethal injection is too good for him."

"Zhou Xijun should be lynched," added another celebrity.

I understand fully the rage and emotion of China's citizens. And even though Zhou has given himself up to the police, he can still receive the death penalty for homicide.

However, I believe in dealing with the case in accordance with the law. Zhou Xinjun's legal rights should be protected, and it should be verified whether he really turned himself in to the police. Even if he is sentenced to capital punishment and is executed immediately, no one should be using words such as "lynching," which only serve to incite public hatred.

We aspire to a society governed by the rule of law. It is important for our officials to withstand the pressure and emotion of public opinion and deal justly with this criminal, however evil he may be.

The purpose of the law is to regulate people's social behavior and make society progress towards civilization. If we allow overflowing hatred to guide us then society will become submerged in this emotion. This runs exactly counter to the nature of the law. If a person's evil incites an entire society's evil, then justice will not prevail, and our society can only be harmed by more evil.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Why Poland's Break With Ukraine Weakens All Enemies Of Russia — Starting With Poland

Poland’s decision to stop sending weapons to Ukraine is being driven by the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party's short-term electoral calculus. Yet the long-term effects on the world stage could deeply undermine the united NATO front against Russia, and the entire Western coalition.

Photo of ​Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Polish President Andrzej Duda in Lutsk, Ukraine, on July 9

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Polish President Andrzej Duda in Lutsk, Ukraine, on July 9

Bartosz T. Wieliński


WARSAW — Poland has now moved from being the country that was most loudly demanding that arms be sent to Ukraine, to a country that has suddenly announced it was withholding military aid. Even if Poland's actions won't match Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki’s words, the government has damaged the standing of our country in the region, and in NATO.

“We are no longer providing arms to Ukraine, because we are now arming Poland,” the prime minister declared on Polsat news on Wednesday evening. He didn’t specify which type of arms he was referring to, but his statement was quickly spread on social media by leading figures of the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

When news that Poland would be withholding arms to Ukraine made their way to the headlines of the most important international media outlets, no politician from PiS stepped in to refute the prime minister’s statement. Which means that Morawiecki said exactly what he meant to say.

The era of tight Polish-Ukrainian collaboration, militarily and politically, has thus come to an end.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest