When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Sources

Fifty Years Later, Iconic Woodstock Photograph Still Makes Waves

Burk Uzzle's image of loving (and muddy) couple at Woodstock has become a symbol for the 1960s hopes for a better future.

Detail of Woodstock photograph
Detail of Woodstock photograph
Juan David Romero

Woodstock, 50 Years (© Burk Uzzle | OneShot)

Fifty years ago, Burk Uzzle, a celebrated photojournalist, drove with his wife and two kids to Bethel, New York. The 31-year-old was heading towards Max Yasgur's 600-acre dairy farm near White Lake to enjoy the much-anticipated Woodstock concert. Uzzle had been enjoying a successful career as a documentary photographer since the early 1960s. At the age of 23, he became the youngest photographer ever for LIFE magazine. In 1968, he spent his time in New York and Atlanta, photographing the funerals of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert Kennedy. This time, however, he was not on a photography assignment: He wanted to have fun with his family and enjoy the music.

What was supposed to be an uncomplicated day trip turned into an odyssey as thousands of people — as the story goes — turned the New York Thruway into a 10-mile-long traffic jam, from August 15-18, 1969. "We were stuck at Woodstock," says Uzzle, who spoke by telephone from his home in North Carolina. Having brought enough film only for one day, and not being able to resist the urge to take photos, he asked other photographers covering the event to lend him some material. It was with one of these old borrowed films that he captured the iconic photo of what eventually became the most significant musical phenomenon American history: Woodstock.

A half-century later, Uzzle reflects back on his photograph and the tumultuous era in which it was taken. Following the Civil Rights movement and the antiwar protests, many believed in the heralding of better times. That is essentially what Woodstock was, or rather what everyone believed it to be: The conclusion to a thundering decade. At that moment, his photograph and the loving couple featured in it symbolized "what we all wanted America to become." That is, in Uzzle's words, a gentle and loving nation.

Photo: Burk Uzzle

"I was very surprised when the photograph became so iconic and I am still surprised," says Uzzle. "It still gets a great deal of attention." And it has become one of the most recognizable images in the history of photography.

The couple, Bobbi and Nick Ercoline, eventually went on to marry and have kids. In fact, Uzzle got a chance to see them again when a magazine sent him on an assignment to mark the 40th anniversary of Woodstock. "I went up to where they lived and I did a new portrait of them. I was delighted to see they still love each other very much," says Uzzle.​

Photo: Burk Uzzle

This message of peace and love, still very dear to Uzzle's heart, was very powerful in the U.S. and beyond. At the time, the world was on fire and you didn't need to look far to find people trying to change it: See Marc Riboud's photograph of Jan Rose Kasmir; Dennis Stock's photo of the Venice Beach Rock Festival; or Jean Pierre-Rey's La Marianne.

But Uzzle worries that things have not changed much since then and that, on the contrary, they have gotten worse: "We have a president and politicians trying to bleed us into hating each other. This is an evil, terrible situation."​

Uzzle's work — resilient, emblematic and impactful — continues to make waves. His current work from his home in Raleigh, North Carolina, where he spends his days capturing the African-American experience is as invested as ever. And the history of his narrative, as he himself says, belongs to all of us.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Future

AI Is Good For Education — And Bad For Teachers Who Teach Like Machines

Despite fears of AI upending the education and the teaching profession, artificial education will be an extremely valuable tool to free up teachers from rote exercises to focus on the uniquely humanistic part of learning.

Journalism teacher and his students in University of Barcelona.

Journalism students at the Blanquerna University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

© Sergi Reboredo via ZUMA press
Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ - Early in 2023, Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates included teaching among the professions most threatened by Artificial Intelligence (AI), arguing that a robot could, in principle, instruct as well as any school-teacher. While Gates is an undoubted expert in his field, one wonders how much he knows about teaching.

As an avowed believer in using technology to improve student results, Gates has argued for teachers to use more tech in classrooms, and to cut class sizes. But schools and countries that have followed his advice, pumping money into technology at school, or students who completed secondary schooling with the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have not attained the superlative results expected of the Gates recipe.

Thankfully, he had enough sense to add some nuance to his views, instead suggesting changes to teacher training that he believes could improve school results.

I agree with his view that AI can be a big and positive contributor to schooling. Certainly, technological changes prompt unease and today, something tremendous must be afoot if a leading AI developer, Geoffrey Hinton, has warned of its threat to people and society.

But this isn't the first innovation to upset people. Over 2,000 years ago, the philosopher Socrates wondered, in the Platonic dialogue Phaedrus, whether reading and writing wouldn't curb people's ability to reflect and remember. Writing might lead them to despise memory, he observed. In the 18th and 19th centuries, English craftsmen feared the machines of the Industrial Revolution would destroy their professions, producing lesser-quality items faster, and cheaper.

Their fears were not entirely unfounded, but it did not happen quite as they predicted. Many jobs disappeared, but others emerged and the majority of jobs evolved. Machines caused a fundamental restructuring of labor at the time, and today, AI will likely do the same with the modern workplace.

Many predicted that television, computers and online teaching would replace teachers, which has yet to happen. In recent decades, teachers have banned students from using calculators to do sums, insisting on teaching arithmetic the old way. It is the same dry and mechanical approach to teaching which now wants to keep AI out of the classroom.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest