When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
eyes on the U.S.

What Watching Whistleblowers Tells Us About Ourselves

Why did he do that? And if you ever thought to do the same...?

Edward Snowden
Edward Snowden
Rinny Gremaud

GENEVA - Why are the whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning making people so uncomfortable?

Here’s the story of a 29-year-old man living with his girlfriend in Hawaii, making $200,000 a year, who one day decides to set himself on fire professionally and socially in the name of democracy. When this man talks to the camera, he articulates his wish to no longer be the nodding cog in a devilish machine. It will cost him everything -- but such is the price to follow his “moral compass,” that ethical internal ear that is quite highly developed for the whistleblowers of his kind.

First reaction: Admiration. What an incredible display of abnegation, a true sense of self-sacrifice from this young man! This is what heroes are made of.

Then comes the slight collective feeling of awkwardness. Suspicion, even. There has to be something wrong in this man’s life, maybe that’s just how he is. Maybe it’s some kind of narcissism, paranoia perhaps, or just another guy with a Jesus complex. For all we know, his girlfriend had just dumped him or his boss said something mean to him and he overreacted. Who just snaps like that? Someone, we tell ourselves, who probably suffers from a great unidentified perversion.

What would you have done?

Edward Snowden, the man who brought the NSA to its knees, is about to be handed over to the two-bit psychological profilers. Details on his private life will leak soon enough, exposing to the world that the knight in shining armor is in fact flawed and that his motivations were not that noble. It happened to Bradley Manning, whose trial started a week ago. Brad Birkenfeld, who exposed fraud at Swiss bank UBS, had to go through the same process, but he got away with it quite well -- just like the other whistleblowers who all suffered from difficult social experiences.

One of them talked to the British daily The Guardian about the five nails on the whistleblower’s cross: 1) You’re ignored, 2) You’re discredited, 3) You’re fired, 4) You’re publicly shamed, 5) Your friends and family turn their backs on you.

All of this, for the record, is perfectly depicted by Michael Mann in the movie The Insider, the true story of Jeffrey Wigand, a former executive from the tobacco industry who had revealed his company’s manipulations to make sure the cigarettes were produced in a way to be ever more addictive.

Why are the whistleblowers making everyone uncomfortable? Probably because it’s the nature of our society to keep its distance with the insubordinate, those people who place their judgment above the rules of the community. But wait, there’s more to it. Maybe it’s this way of putting every one of us in front of our responsibilities. We end up asking ourselves: What would I have done if I were in his place? What kind of machinery am I fueling, doing what I do? Every single day I do what I’m told, but in the end, am I not contributing to making this world worse than it is? Is my salary a monthly bribe to keep my mouth shut? Should I ask for a raise?

I’m not writing this just for the bankers, the business lawyers, the tax specialists and the CIA agents reading this newspaper. The truth is we can all ask ourselves those questions. The tricky part is that with the twists of history, the shifting sands of power and laws, no one can ever be sure that he or she has the right answer.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Big Brother For The People: India's CCTV Strategy For Cracking Down On Police Abuse

"There is nothing fashionable about installing so many cameras in and outside one’s house," says a lawyer from a Muslim community. And yet, doing this has helped members of the community prove unfair police action against them.

A woman is walking in the distance while a person holds a military-style gun close up

Survellance and tight security at the Lal Chowk area in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India on October 4, 2022

Sukanya Shantha

MUMBAI — When sleuths of the National Investigating Agency suddenly descended on human rights defender and school teacher Abdul Wahid Shaikh’s house on October 11, he knew exactly what he needed to do next.

He had been monitoring the three CCTVs that are installed on the front and the rear of his house — a chawl in Vikhroli, a densely populated area in suburban Mumbai. The cameras told him that a group of men and women — some dressed in Mumbai police’s uniform and a few in civil clothes — had converged outside his house. Some of them were armed and few others with batons were aggressively banging at the door asking him to immediately let them in.

This was not the first time that the police had landed at his place at 5 am.

When the policemen discovered the CCTV cameras outside his house, they began hitting it with their batons, destroying one of them mounted right over the door. This action was captured by the adjacent CCTV camera. Shaikh, holed up in his house with his wife and two children, kept pleading with the police to stop destroying his property and simply show them an official notice.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest