When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
eyes on the U.S.

A Foreign Eye On America's Stunning Drop In Life Expectancy

Over the past two years, the United States has lost more than two years of life expectancy, wiping out 26 years of progress. French daily Les Echos investigates the myriad of causes, which are mostly resulting in the premature deaths of young people.

Image of a person holding the national flag of the United States in front of a grave.

A person holding the national flag of the United States in front of a grave.

Hortense Goulard

On May 6, a gunman opened fire in a Texas supermarket, killing eight people, including several children, before being shot dead by police. Particularly bloody, this episode is not uncommon in the U.S. — it is the 22nd mass killing (resulting in the death of more than four people) this year.

Gun deaths are one reason why life expectancy is falling in the U.S. But it's not the only one. Last December, the American authorities confirmed that life expectancy at birth had fallen significantly in just two years: From 78.8 years in 2019, it would be just 76.1 years in 2021.

To receive Eyes on U.S. each week in your inbox, sign up here.

The country has thus dropped to a level not reached since 1996. This is equivalent to erasing 26 years of progress.Life expectancy has declined in other parts of the world as a result of the pandemic, but the U.S. remains the developed country with the steepest decline — and the only one where this trend has not been reversed with the advent of vaccines. Most shocking of all: This decline is linked above all to an increase in violent deaths among the youngest members of the population.

Five-year-olds living in the U.S. have a one in 25 chance of dying before their 40th birthday, according to calculations by The Financial Times. For other developed countries, including France, this rate is closer to one in 100. Meanwhile, the life expectancy of a 75-year-old American differs little from that of other OECD countries.

Opioid crisis

The causes of this collapse are many. Among them is a sharp rise in overdose deaths. In San Francisco in 2020, 697 people died from a lethal dose of drugs, usually fentanyl. That's more than double the number of COVID-related deaths during the same period.

Behind this crisis are powerful drugs, including Oxycodone. Over-prescribed by doctors and promoted by an unscrupulous pharmaceutical industry, they have resulted in hundreds of thousands of Americans falling prey to addiction. Fentanyl overdoses are now the leading cause of death for 18-49 year-olds in the U.S., according to an analysis by The Washington Post.

According to the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, drugs claimed 564,000 Americans' lives between 1999 and 2020. And this trend has clearly accelerated in recent years. By 2021, the CDC expects more than 100,000 overdose deaths nationwide.

Image of prescription pain pills on a table.

Prescription pain pills on a table.

U.S. Air Force

"Deaths of despair"

More generally, researchers are worried about a rise in "deaths of despair" in the U.S. This category includes overdose deaths, alcohol-related deaths and suicides. In their book Deaths of Despair: The Future of Capitalism, Anne Case and Angus Deaton analyze this disturbing trend, which mainly affects poorly educated white men, but also women with no formal education— two categories of the population particularly affected by globalization and the automation of certain tasks.

It reflects a certain indifference to danger.

Instead of hiring full-time employees, companies are increasingly turning to flexible contracts. This takes away the opportunity for people with no formal education to climb the corporate hierarchy.

"The pillars that structured life and helped give it meaning — a job with prospects for advancement, a secure family life, a voice in the community — have all disappeared," writes the author.

Racial injustice

The decline in life expectancy in the U.S. also reflects a certain indifference to danger. For example, Americans drive more than Europeans. But this does not entirely explain the increase in fatal accidents on American roads. In 2021, in the European Union, 19,800 people died in road accidents. Despite having a smaller population than the EU, over 43,000 Americans died in the same way that year.

According to a study by The New York Times, pedestrians and cyclists in particular are affected by this increase. Between 2000 and 2020, the number of fatal accidents fell for motorists, but rose for everyone else. A worrying trend, which particularly affects African-Americans and Latinos.

The higher vulnerability of American pedestrians and cyclists can be explained by the way cities are organized around the car. Everything is done to ease the circulation of motor vehicles at the cost of other users. The lack of infrastructure encourages speeding, while the SUV craze makes these accidents more deadly.

Misplaced belief in American exceptionalism

Although the poorest people are the most affected, they are not the only ones concerned by this fall in life expectancy. On the contrary, all strata of American society — right down to the wealthiest 1% — appear to be living shorter, less healthy lives than the populations of comparable countries. In a landmark study published 10 years ago, a group of researchers examined the causes of this American exception.

There has been a little more research, but there has been no political reaction.

In their conclusions, the authors recommended that American authorities "thoroughly study the public policies and approaches that other countries with healthier populations have found useful and that could be adopted, with adaptation, in the United States".

But, 10 years on, "very little has happened", says the report's lead author. Eileen Crimmins, a professor of gerontology at the University of Southern California who took part in the study, agrees: "There has been a little more research, but there has been no political reaction." At a meeting in Washington, she observed that experts from other countries were not listened to in the name of a misplaced belief in American exceptionalism.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


The Unsustainable Future Of Fish Farming — On Vivid Display In Turkish Waters

Currently, 60% of Turkey's fish currently comes from cultivation, also known as fish farming, compared to just 10% two decades ago. The short-sightedness of this shift risks eliminating fishing output from both the farms and the open seas along Turkey's 5,200 miles of coastline.

Photograph of two fishermen throwing a net into the Tigris river in Turkey.

Traditional fishermen on the Tigris river, Turkey.

Dûrzan Cîrano/Wikimeidia
İrfan Donat

ISTANBUL — Turkey's annual fish production includes 515,000 tons from cultivation and 335,000 tons came from fishing in open waters. In other words, 60% of Turkey's fish currently comes from cultivation, also known as fish farming.

It's a radical shift from just 20 years ago when some 600,000 tons, or 90% of the total output, came from fishing. Now, researchers are warning the current system dominated by fish farming is ultimately unsustainable in the country with 8,333 kilometers (5,177 miles) long.

Professor Mustafa Sarı from the Maritime Studies Faculty of Bandırma 17 Eylül University believes urgent action is needed: “Why were we getting 600,000 tons of fish from the seas in the 2000’s and only 300,000 now? Where did the other 300,000 tons of fish go?”

Professor Sarı is challenging the argument from certain sectors of the industry that cultivation is the more sustainable approach. “Now we are feeding the fish that we cultivate at the farms with the fish that we catch from nature," he explained. "The fish types that we cultivate at the farms are sea bass, sea bram, trout and salmon, which are fed with artificial feed produced at fish-feed factories. All of these fish-feeds must have a significant amount of fish flour and fish oil in them.”

That fish flour and fish oil inevitably must come from the sea. "We have to get them from natural sources. We need to catch 5.7 kilogram of fish from the seas in order to cultivate a sea bream of 1 kg," Sarı said. "Therefore, we are feeding the fish to the fish. We cannot cultivate fish at the farms if the fish in nature becomes extinct. The natural fish need to be protected. The consequences would be severe if the current policy is continued.”

Keep reading...Show less

The latest