When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
eyes on the U.S.

Obama’s Shadow, White House Photographer Pete Souza Looks Back

Obama’s Shadow, White House Photographer Pete Souza Looks Back
Caroline Stevan

Pete Souza has worked for the Chicago Tribune, Life and National Geographic. He's covered the war in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks and the beginning of Barack Obama's Senate career. He's been the White House's official photographer twice, for Ronald Reagan and for Barack Obama. At 62, Souza is always ready for another shot. But first, it is time to zoom in and reflect on a singular presidency.

LE TEMPS: How do you feel at the end of the Obama presidency?

PETE SOUZA: The end of this administration leaves me with a bittersweet feeling. I've really appreciated being able to document Barack Obama's presidency in pictures through both terms. But I'm also looking forward to a new rhythm.

What sort of a photographic model is Barack Obama?

He's not a "model." He's the president of the United States and he happens to be a good photographic subject because he's allowed me to capture the sincere and spontaneous moments of his life.

Many observers also believe you've contributed immensely to his "cool" image. What do you think?

I have no idea. My work consists of taking the best photographs I can, day after day.

I've read that you'd taken between 500 and 1,000 pictures per day. If you could only keep one, which one would it be?

That is correct, except for the busier days when I take more than 2,000 pictures. I consider this work to be important in its entirety, and not just one single photograph.

You were also Ronald Reagan's official photographer. What's the main difference between these two experiences?

There are so many differences. President Reagan was more than 50 years older than me. I didn't know him before entering the White House and that limited my access. He also wasn't as physically active as President Obama. I've known Barack Obama since 2005, so I'd already developed a professional relationship with him. This led him to grant me unrestricted access to his presidency.

Souza in action in Oslo in 2009 after Obama won the Nobel Prize — Photo: Jan-Kristian Schriwer

Political communication has changed a lot these past few years and images are an essential part of it. What do you think of this evolution and the rise of social networks?

The emergence of social media is also a big difference between the two administrations. Twitter and Instagram in particular have become huge tools for the White House. I became the photographer of a freshly-elected President Obama at a time when social media was booming. Anybody would have made the most of these tools, no matter who was going to be the photographer or president.

What are your projects for the future?

I will continue to be very active in the field of photography. I don't know exactly what I'm going to do, but I'd like to to publish a book on my work during the Obama administration.



Here is a look back at the two Obama terms, year-by-year, through Pete Souza's lens. All pictures: Pete Souza/The White House

2009

Running with the family's dog, Bo, in the White House in Washington, D.C. on April 13, 2009

2010

With Indiab Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, India, on Nov. 8, 2010

2011

In the Situation Room of the White House, with Vice President Joe Biden and members of the national security team, as the mission against Osama bin Laden goes underway on May 1, 2011

2012

On "Kiss Cam" with First Lady Michelle Obama at a basketball game in Washington, D.C. on July 16, 2012

2013

Playing with kids during a visit to a pre-kindergarten classroom in Decatur, Georgia on Feb. 14, 2013.

2014

Watching July 4 fireworks from the roof of the White House with First Lady Michelle Obama and daughter Malia Obama

2015

Boarding Air Force One at Norman Manley International Airportin Kingston, Jamaica, on April 9, 2015

2016

In the Green Room of the White House on Jan. 5, 2016

2017

In the Oval Office on Jan. 10, 2017

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

Lex Tusk? How Poland’s Controversial "Russian Influence" Law Will Subvert Democracy

The new “lex Tusk” includes language about companies and their management. But is this likely to be a fair investigation into breaking sanctions on Russia, or a political witch-hunt in the business sphere?

Photo of President of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda

Polish President Andrzej Duda

Piotr Miaczynski, Leszek Kostrzewski

-Analysis-

WARSAW — Poland’s new Commission for investigating Russian influence, which President Andrzej Duda signed into law on Monday, will be able to summon representatives of any company for inquiry. It has sparked a major controversy in Polish politics, as political opponents of the government warn that the Commission has been given near absolute power to investigate and punish any citizen, business or organization.

And opposition politicians are expected to be high on the list of would-be suspects, starting with Donald Tusk, who is challenging the ruling PiS government to return to the presidency next fall. For that reason, it has been sardonically dubbed: Lex Tusk.

University of Warsaw law professor Michal Romanowski notes that the interests of any firm can be considered favorable to Russia. “These are instruments which the likes of Putin and Orban would not be ashamed of," Romanowski said.

The law on the Commission for examining Russian influences has "atomic" prerogatives sewn into it. Nine members of the Commission with the rank of secretary of state will be able to summon virtually anyone, with the powers of severe punishment.

Under the new law, these Commissioners will become arbiters of nearly absolute power, and will be able to use the resources of nearly any organ of the state, including the secret services, in order to demand access to every available document. They will be able to prosecute people for acts which were not prohibited at the time they were committed.

Their prerogatives are broader than that of the President or the Prime Minister, wider than those of any court. And there is virtually no oversight over their actions.

Nobody can feel safe. This includes companies, their management, lawyers, journalists, and trade unionists.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest