When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

eyes on the U.S.

My Ethics Professor Is A Criminal

To teach business ethics to students, several MBA programs are inviting convicted white-collar criminals to talk about how they defrauded their companies.

Ex- Enron financial director Andrew Fastow visits Leeds Business School (CESR)
Ex- Enron financial director Andrew Fastow visits Leeds Business School (CESR)

BOULDER - The Leeds Business School auditorium at the University of Colorado is jam packed. Around 1600 students came to hear the star of the day: a 50-something man with short white hair and a striped shirt. His name is Andrew Fastow, and his audience is spellbound.

At the end of the 1990s, Fastow was Enron's financial director, and partly responsible for one of the biggest bankruptcies America has ever known. In 2002, a year after his company's collapse, he was indicted on fraud, money laundering and conspiracy. He cooperated with authorities and served six years.

The conference leaves no one indifferent. "It makes us realize that at any time, we could be confronted with a situation in which we might act unethically," says b-school student Pete Williams. "It's very important for us to think about where we stand, whether we would cross the line."

Three weeks before Fastow's visit, and during the following three weeks, the Leeds held formal and informal discussions on ethics and the failures of the business world. The recurrent question was: what should - and would - you have done in Andrew Fastow's shoes?

"In the seven years I've spent here, I've never seen the student and teacher body so enthusiastic about an event. There is a huge educational value. Stories like Andrew Fastow's are so real that they capture student and teacher attention like no other traditional class," says Donna Sockell, from the Center for Education on Social Responsibility at the Colorado school, who organized the conference.

This isn't the only institution taking such initiatives. For the past 10 years, as financial scandals continue to make headlines, business schools have integrated business ethics to their curriculums, a trend strengthened further by the 2008 subprime crisis.

Many schools invite white-collar criminals to talk to the student about their edifying experiences. Recently, founder and former CEO of the Quellos Group, Jeffrey Greenstein, spoke at the University of Washington's Foster School of Business. He had been sentenced to four years in prison for tax fraud.

NYSE trader Garrett Bauer was just sentenced to nine years in prison after pleading guilty to an insider-trading scheme that made him more than $32.2 million. He has spoken to over 120 colleges since Sept. 2011, including the London Business School and Harvard University.

Glamorizing convicted felons

There is so much interest in these testimonies that specialist firms like "The Pros & the Cons' have made a business out of fraud prevention classes - with testimonials from convicted "fraudsters." Richard Shreve doesn't approve. He is a business ethics professor at the Tuck School of Business, where inviting white-collar criminals to talk to the student has become a ritual. Each year since 2001, an ex-criminal comes to tell his story, but "we never pay them," assures the professor, who knows these events are controversial.

"People might think that we are glamorizing these criminals or reinforcing the belief that all businessmen are crooks. To dispel these notions, we invite more exemplary CEOs than convicted felons. But the conferences with white-collar criminals are extremely popular and foster ethical debates on campus," says Shreve.

Some stories deeply move the students. A mother tells them about how she had to put her two daughters on a plane and entrust them with family friends before she was incarcerated with her husband for double billing. "In all of these stories, there is always a conjunction of three factors: need, opportunity and reason - that is to say the narrative the criminal uses to justify his actions. It's amazing to see how many of them, even the convicted ones, stick to this narrative," says Shreve.

According to him, there is no need to convince students that it's wrong to commit fraud. "They are honest people. But it's very probable that one day they'll be confronted with a professional situation where it is hard to decide what the right thing is. What do you do, for instance, when the legitimate interest of shareholders conflicts with that of the employees?" When the time comes to resolve an ethical dilemma, having crossed paths with convicts might help them make the right choice.

Read more from Le Monde in French

Photo - The Center for Education on Social Responsibility (CESR)

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

What Lula Needs Now To Win: Move To The Center And Mea Culpa

Despite the leftist candidate's first-place finish, the voter mood in Brazil's presidential campaign is clearly conservative. So Lula will have to move clearly to the political center to vanquish the divisive but still popular Jair Bolsonaro. He also needs to send a message of contrition to skeptical voters about past mistakes.

Brazilian votes show a polarized national opinion with two clear winners: former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and sitting president Jair Bolsonaro

Marcelo Cantelmi

-Analysis-

The first round of Brazil's presidential elections closed with two winners, a novelty but not necessarily a political surprise.

Leftist candidate and former president, Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, was clearly the winner. His victory came on the back of the successes of his two previous administrations (2003-2011), kept alive today by the harsh reality that large swathes of Brazilians see no real future for themselves.

Lula, the head of the Workers Party or PT, also moved a tad toward the political Center in a bid to seduce middle-class voters, with some success. Another factor in his first-round success was a decisive vote cast against the current government, though this was less considerable than anticipated.

The other big winner of the day was the sitting president, Jair Bolsonaro. For many voters, his defects turn out to be virtues. They were little concerned by his bombastic declarations, his authoritarian bent, contempt for modernity, his retrograde views on gender and his painful management of the pandemic. They do not believe in Lula, and envisage no other alternative.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ