When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Boston, before the Marathon...
Boston, before the Marathon...
Henryk M. Broder

New York 2001. Bali 2002. Djerba 2002. Istanbul 2003. Madrid 2004. London 2005. Mumbai 2006. Boston 2013. "Terror Is Back," trumpeted newspaper headlines in the U.S. – as if it had ever left.

Only minutes after the latest terror attack, German Wikipedia had updated its List of Bomb Attacks.

The list begins on Dec. 13, 1867 with the Clerkenwell Outrage in London when 12 people were killed and 50 injured after a fighter for Irish independence planted a bomb outside a prison wall thinking that it would merely blow a hole in the wall and allow fellow comrades to escape.

It ends – for the time being – last Monday with two bombs, three dead, and over 140 injured at the Boston Marathon.

Take a closer look at that list and two things stand out. Between the London bomb and the second big attack in 1875 that left 83 dead in Bremerhaven, Germany, eight years went by – and it was 45 years before the next major bomb attack, on Wall Street in New York causing 38 deaths.

But the closer you get to the present, the shorter the distances between attacks. This year alone there were 56, including Boston.

The second thing that stands out: over 90% of recorded bomb attacks against installations and gatherings of people, in which car bombs and bombs packed into backpacks are used, get hardly any western media attention since they happen in places perceived as “exotic” – like Aleppo in Syria, Shaqra in Yemen, Rawalpindi in Pakistan, Tikrit in Iraq and Kano in Nigeria.

There are places in Asia and Africa where bomb attacks are as commonplace as traffic accidents are in Europe. What experts on such attacks, like historian like Walter Laqueur, have long warned of has now come to pass – terror has become the weapon of choice of the underdog.

And a second novelty is also in the process of becoming reality. While hijacking airliners may be spectacular, it is also very complicated and risky – but attacks against soft targets like trains, buses, mass events, are a lot easier to carry out. A cynic might even imagine terrorists thinking in terms of price/performance ratio when planning an attack.

Regardless of whoever turns out to be responsible for the Boston bombs, the perpetrators accomplished their goal with relatively little hassle. For the first time since 9/11 Americans don’t feel so safe – visitors at the National Mall in Washington D.C. carrying what appear to be suspiciously large bags are stopped and asked to show what’s in them, and some hotels are even refusing to store bags for guests who have already checked out.

“Attack one of us and you attack us all”

On Tuesday, after American Airlines’s computer system broke down and more than a thousand flights were cancelled as a result, many of the some 100,000 stranded passengers will have wondered if it really was a computer glitch or if it might in some way be related to what happened in Boston.

But there was no panic. No cancellation of events. Comics like Stephen Colbert (The Colbert Report) and Jon Stewart (The Daily Show) began their TV shows on Tuesday evening with a bow to the people of Boston who had shown courage and willingness to help in a horrific situation.

All around the country, people were singing Neil Diamond’s "Sweet expand=1] Caroline," a song traditionally sung at Boston Red Sox baseball games. It was just the way it was after the attacks on September 11, 2001: people pulling together – in the words of one man: “attack one of us and you attack us all.”

To the European observer here, it always comes as a surprise to see how Americans react like a family in critical situations. You see it everywhere, at gas stations, supermarkets, bakery shops. Instead of the usual – never truly meant – "How you doin" today?" people say hello by asking each other if there’s any news out of Boston. The media broadcast every detail of every new bit of information released by investigators, and everyone knows somebody who knows somebody who ran in the marathon.

But this is also true: the way the country “moved on” and within two days returned to “normality” is enough to leave one speechless.

On Wednesday, legislation initiated by President Obama aimed at making it a little more difficult to acquire guns on the Internet and at weapons fairs by introducing background checks on buyers failed to pass the Senate.

Such controls have long been the norm in gun stores. Obama was so angered by the result of the vote that he made a long statement live on TV about this “Day of Shame,” and accused gun lobbyists of spreading lies. At his side were relatives of the victims of gunmen, including the parents of a little girl shot in the bloodbath along with 19 other children and six teachers at a school in Sandy Hook in Newtown, Connecticut, in Dec. 2012.

Yes, America is a strange country. It has an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants who pay some $7 billion annually into social security. In some states it’s more complicated to buy a bottle of whiskey than it is to buy a handgun.

The President was forced to apologize for calling California’s Kamala Harris “the best-looking attorney general in the country,” and public servants have to take an annual test on sexual harassment to learn what not to do or say to a member of the opposite sex when complimenting them.

But at the end of the day it’s a big, wonderful country – dynamic, unfinished, on a perpetual search for itself.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

How South American Oceans Can Sway The U.S.-China Showdown

As global rivalries and over-fishing impact the seas around South America, countries there must find a common strategy to protect their maritime backyards.

RIMPAC 2022

Juan Gabriel Tokatlian

-Analysis-

BUENOS AIRES — As the U.S.-China rivalry gathers pace, oceans matter more than ever. This is evident just looking at the declarations and initiatives enacted concerning the Indian and Pacific oceans.

Yet there is very little debate in South America on the Sino-American confrontation and its impact on seas around South America, specifically the South-Eastern Pacific (SEP) and South-Western Atlantic (SWA). These have long ceased to be empty spaces — and their importance to the world's superpowers can only grow.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ