When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Sources

Why Queen Elizabeth II Will Never Abdicate

Last queen standing
Last queen standing
Marie-Hélène Martin

Just over a year ago, when Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands handed her eldest son Willem Alexander the reins of the country, everybody in Britain wondered whether Queen Elizabeth II would be next. Now, as Spain’s Juan Carlos, 76, steps down to "renew" the monarchy, questions are rising again about the British queen’s succession.

But most royal family observers agree that the 88-year-old monarch, who will travel to France on Friday for the 70th anniversary of D-Day, has no intention of leaving the party.

“I can’t see our Queen abdicating,” explains Stephen Bates, a British monarchy expert. “It’s not in her DNA. Britain got a taste of abdication once in 1936, when Edward VIII wanted to marry Wallis Simpson. It took them a long time to recover from that.”

Besides, the Windsors are not the Bourbons. Unlike Juan Carlos, Queen Elizabeth is still very popular.

Last one standing

During her Diamond Jubilee in 2012, in front of the two houses of Parliament, Elizabeth renewed her commitment to her work with her subjects. “The Queen sees it as her duty to go on for as long as she can. I think she would abdicate only if she was physically or mentally incapable of carrying on with her work. But if she takes after her mother, who lived until 101, she could become the first monarch to live to be a hundred,” Bates continues.

In that sense, she is following in the footsteps of her great-great-grandmother, Queen Victoria. Come September 2015, she could pip her ancestor at the post, beating her 63 years and seven months on the throne.

In November 2013 already, when Prince Charles celebrated his 65th birthday — an age at which others usually retire — oracles and other specialists of European monarchies suggested that Elizabeth would never abdicate. Instead, a “job-share” solution or a soft transition seemed to be her favored choice. Lately, the Queen has offloaded part of her responsibilities on Charles, whose very personal style in diplomatic matters makes him stand out.

Safe for a spectacular turn of events, it looks like Queen Elizabeth II will be the last one standing on the chessboard of Europe’s monarchs. Once again, the British are doing things their own way.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Photograph of Police and emergency services working at the site of a shooting in Jerusalem that saw two gunmen kill three people at a bus station in the Israeli capital.

Police and emergency services are working at the site of a shooting in Jerusalem that saw two gunmen kill three people at a bus station in the Israeli capital.

Anne-Sophie Goninet and Bertrand Hauger

👋 ନମସ୍କାର*

Welcome to Thursday, where Hamas claims responsibility for a shooting that killed three people in Jerusalem just hours after Israel extended a ceasefire in Gaza, Henry Kissinger dies at age 100, and Singapore gets some company at the top of the world’s most expensive cities. Meanwhile, Turin-based daily La Stampa’s correspondent at the Israel-Gaza border describes conditions amid the fragile ceasefire.

[*Namaskār - Odia, India]

Keep reading...Show less

The latest