When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing. save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Why Politically 'Decent' Germany Loves Devilish House Of Cards

"There are two kinds of pain"
"There are two kinds of pain"
Ulf Poschardt

BERLIN — Frank Underwood is a cult figure to those besotted by politics. The House of Cards protagonist is willing to walk over dead bodies to achieve absolute power. As the third season begins, we are obliged to ask ourselves why Germans have such a deep love for this American villain played by Kevin Spacey.

The trauma caused by the most minor political scandals shows just how thoroughly decent Germans are. Helmut Kohl , one of the leading statesmen of the 20th century, retired from politics amid a rather tame donation scandal . As German Green Party politician Claudia Roth says, German politicians value decency, and that's exactly why they love and have become such loyal fans of this cult series about the heights of political indecency.

House of Cards, whose third season started in Germany last week, analyzes and holds up a mirror to politics and its democratic workings . It does it in such a way that even insiders are fascinated and inspired by it, although fortunately not necessarily inspired to follow its example.

Murder, lies and intrigue

The storyline follows the unstoppable rise to power of the Democratic Party's ambitious congressional leader. And it's packed full of murder, lies, intrigue, manipulation, blackmail and kidnapping. Democratic Party leader Frank Underwood, the inscrutable series protagonist, personifies Machiavellian methods to become the most virtuoso power player of them all.

Washington's political apparatus, at the center of the last remaining world power, is his instrument, and he knows how to play it. He collects the strengths and weaknesses of his enemies and friends like other people collect books, all to advance his own cause.

His will is simply monstrous to behold. Underwood is unbelievably efficient — while others talk, he acts. Where others hesitate, he pounces. When others only start to think, he has already solved the problem to his own satisfaction.

Alpha male's absolute solitude

Underwood fights his way up from the bottom of the heap with hard work, shrewdness and ruthlessness. He marries a beautiful woman of high standing drawn by his erotic aura of the alpha male. She is the last confidante of the man who otherwise lives in absolute solitude .

As an interesting aside, actor Kevin Spacey is actually a good friend of the Clintons. The genius writer of the series, Beau Willimon, worked for Democratic Party election campaigns even as a teenager, Hillary Clinton's included. He later served a stint for the Estonian government in Tallinn before deciding to follow his dreams of becoming a writer.

Willimon's script for the film drama The Ides of March was filled with disillusioned observations of politicians who stand for the good, the true and the beautiful. And it is because of that disappointment, Underwood is a Democrat and not a caricature of a Tea Party clown or a Bush acolyte.

[rebelmouse-image 27088697 alt="""" original_size="259x384" expand=1]

Spacey revealed in an interview that insiders told him House of Cards was 99% accurate . The inaccurately portrayed 1% is the supposed efficiency of the U.S. Congress, which is only added to drive the narrative forward. Underwood is interested only in results, not in the immoral means to reach them. He doesn't spare himself or others, may they be friend or enemy or spouse.

Nearly everything about him seems radical. He discovers people and their talents and drops them as soon as they disappoint him or lose their value.

Echoing the world's traumas

The national and international stage of power is presented in a cool and elegant light in this series. Caustic punch lines, not sentiment, are the order of the day. The success of Underwood's fictional character, with legions of fans, may also be an echo of the world's traumas in the early 21st century — Islamist terror, Russia's alienation from the rest of the world, the failure of nation building, the global financial crisis, and signs of fatigue among the West's democracies.

It's against this backdrop that the cruel, mentally disturbed Underwood appears to be the silver lining on the horizon rather than a side effect of decadence. He is virile enough to disentangle the most complex incompatibilities of dialogue through brutality or intrigue. Underwood loves democracy, America, social mobility and the dynamics of human nature. He wants to create a better America but despises those who are too naïve or sentimental in their approach. He very nearly sacrifices everything for this one true, but broken, love.

The trailers for the third season, shared by thousands of fans, have made followers of the series nervous because they seem to imply that Underwood may lose Claire, the love of his life. At the end of the second season, something comes to life in Claire that Underwood has long since lost: a conscience. It is looking dark for Underwood indeed.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

A Profound And Simple Reason That Negotiations Are Not An Option For Ukraine

The escalation of war in the Middle East and the stagnation of the Ukrainian counteroffensive have left many leaders in the West, who once supported Ukraine unequivocally, to look toward ceasefire talks with Russia. For Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza , Piotr Andrusieczko argues that Ukraine simply cannot afford this.

Ukrainian soldiers ploughing through the snow on the frontlines

Volodymyr Zelensky 's official Facebook account
Piotr Andrusieczko


KYIV Ukraine is fighting for its very existence, and the war will not end soon. What should be done in the face of this reality? How can Kyiv regain its advantage on the front lines?

It's hard to deny that pessimism has been spreading among supporters of the Ukrainian cause, with some even predicting ultimate defeat for Kyiv. It's difficult to agree with this, considering how this war began and what was at stake. Yes, Ukraine has not won yet, but Ukrainians have no choice for now but to continue fighting.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here .

These assessments are the result of statements by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, General Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, and an interview with him in the British weekly The Economist , where the General analyzes the causes of failures on the front, notes the transition of the war to the positional phase, and, critically, evaluates the prospects and possibilities of breaking the deadlock.

Earlier, an article appeared in the American weekly TIME analyzing the challenges facing President Volodymyr Zelensky. His responses indicate that he is disappointed with the attitude of Western partners, and at the same time remains so determined that, somewhat lying to himself, he unequivocally believes in victory.

Combined, these two publications sparked discussions about the future course of the conflict and whether Ukraine can win at all.

Some people outright predict that what has been known from the beginning will happen: Russia will ultimately win, and Ukraine has already failed.

Keep reading... Show less

The latest