When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

CAIXINMEDIA

The Emotional Republic Of China

Words and feeling and the party line. Leaning on Western studies of social psychology, the writer deconstructs how the powers that be have taught Chinese people how to feel.

Stay in line
Stay in line
Zhou Lian

BEIJING — I still remember that summer day. I was seven years old, visiting the factory where my parents worked, when the large speakers broadcasting the Red Songs were suddenly interrupted. It was a public condolence read with a low voice full of grief.

I was playing with other children in front of the gate. My mother came to pull me into the house and told me solemnly that I was not allowed to laugh in public because — our kind Soong Ching-Ling grandma has passed away.

Though I didn’t fully understand what it was all about at my young age, I immediately accepted my mother’s explanation and tried hard not to express anything particularly happy for the rest of that day.

It was not until many years later that I understood that, strictly speaking, rather than being based on moral reason my mom’s explanation of the death of an iconic leader of the revolution was based on an intuitional training and emotional discipline — our “kind grandma” had died, and playfulness was therefore the wrong behavior. It’s an instinctive judgment that needs no inference, just like we feel the joy of seeing flowers and sense heart palpitations hearing the word “cancer.”

Robert Zajonc, the late Polish-born American social psychologist, is convinced that humans have an “emotion priority.” We are not at all so rational, neutral and objective as some assume when dealing with information. Contrary to what people imagine, humans tend to make emotional judgments first and foremost. Not only is it a preference, but is also more powerful than our rationality because it directly stimulates and influences a human’s behavior.

As Zajonc put it, people will begin to have a good impression of any words or images to which they are sufficiently exposed. This tendency of associating the familiar with what we feel good about is called the “Mere-exposure effect.”

‘Great’ Mao

From childhood until adulthood, various matters are accepted with likes and dislikes through this particular effect, and this forges corresponding emotional responses. This universal theory also plays out with its particularities in modern China.

For example, Soong Ching-ling is “kind,” Mao Zedong is “great,” Zhou Enlai is “beloved,” the old society is “evil.” The KMT (Taiwan’s Nationalist party) is “corrupt.” Taiwan is associated with “needs reclaiming,” democracy automatically with “chaos,” while the United States is associated not only with “American imperialism,” but also “wickedness” as well as “having not given up the wild ambition to subjugate us.”

[rebelmouse-image 27087983 alt="""" original_size="377x264" expand=1]

Mao looking *great* as he watches over his cadres, in a 1969 poster (wikipedia)

This kind of unhesitating reaction is called “pattern matching,” in psychological terms. It’s economical and practical, rapid and spontaneous, as well as inert.

Naturally, it doesn’t necessarily mean that people cannot question and modify their initial intuition with moral reasoning after-the-fact. The research of social psychologist Jonathan Haidt — notably The Elephant and Rider Metaphor — draws analogies between elephants and rider to express intuition and conscious reasoning. Though the elephant (intuition) isn’t an absolute dictator, its authority, or say inertia, is much larger than that of the rider (rationality).

In my personal experience, my most notable elephantine inertia is reflected in my judgment of the “beloved Premier Zhou Enlai.” Though much historical data prove that Zhou Enlai committed many errors during China’s Cultural Revolution, and he had some personal shortcomings, it doesn’t do much to change the warm feeling and respect for him deep in my heart.

When I realized that on this very problem the rider of the elephant indeed was unable to influence the elephant, I suddenly understood why I will never be able to convince some of my leftist friends.

In another one of his books, “The Righteous Mind,” Haidt listed six intuitions as moral foundations: care/harm, liberty/oppression, fairness/lies, loyalty/betrayal, authority/subversion, sanctity/degradation. He believes, within America’s political spectrum, the political left tends to rest more on the first three foundations that reflect their emphasis on compassion for the poor and a struggle for political equality. Meanwhile, the conservatives are more willing to sacrifice love in order to achieve other moral goals.

If this analysis is applied to what inspires the Chinese, one of the fundamental reasons why liberalism faces all sorts of difficulties in China is the lack of childhood love, freedom and a fair emotional education. When facing moral differences and political conflicts we should aim to abstain from the dogmatic position of “I am the truth, you are fallacious.” We should concentrate rather on communicating with the elephant instead of only with the rider of the elephant. After all, it is emotional education that has the power to fundamentally change a person.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

New Probe Finds Pro-Bolsonaro Fake News Dominated Social Media Through Campaign

Ahead of Brazil's national elections Sunday, the most interacted-with posts on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Telegram and WhatsApp contradict trustworthy information about the public’s voting intentions.

Jair Bolsonaro bogus claims perform well online

Cris Faga/ZUMA
Laura Scofield and Matheus Santino

SÂO PAULO — If you only got your news from social media, you might be mistaken for thinking that Jair Bolsonaro is leading the polls for Brazil’s upcoming presidential elections, which will take place this Sunday. Such a view flies in the face of what most of the polling institutes registered with the Superior Electoral Court indicate.

An exclusive investigation by the Brazilian investigative journalism agency Agência Pública has revealed how the most interacted-with and shared posts in Brazil on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Telegram and WhatsApp share data and polls that suggest victory is certain for the incumbent Bolsonaro, as well as propagating conspiracy theories based on false allegations that research institutes carrying out polling have been bribed by Bolsonaro’s main rival, former president Luís Inácio Lula da Silva, or by his party, the Workers’ Party.

Agência Pública’s reporters analyzed the most-shared posts containing the phrase “pesquisa eleitoral” [electoral polls] in the period between the official start of the campaigning period, on August 16, to September 6. The analysis revealed that the most interacted-with and shared posts on social media spread false information or predicted victory for Jair Bolsonaro.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ