When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!

Rugby Coach Peter de Villiers, South Africa’s King Of Controversy

Peter De Villiers first made headlines by becoming the first black coach of the powerful South African national rugby team. But it's his controversial comments that have all the rugby world up in arms. The latest: disparaging remark about the New

South African rugby coach Peter de Villiers
South African rugby coach Peter de Villiers
Bruno Lesprit

LE MONDE/Worldcrunch

WELLINGTON For someone with a reputation as a ‘professional provocateur," Peter de Villiers had been remarkably discreet during this year's Rugby World Cup. But of course it was only a matter of time before the South African coach would say something to ruffle some feathers.

That moment finally came on Monday, when De Villiers took the bold step of slagging off none other than the haka dance, one of host country New Zealand's sacred symbols. Haka, a traditional war dance of the country's indigenous Maori people, has gained notoriety throughout the world thanks to New Zealand's national rugby team, the All Blacks, which performs the dance before international matches.

De Villiers suggested the All Blacks may be overdoing things when it comes to haka. "The people get too used to it. It's no longer a novelty, so people don't respect it."

New Zealanders young and old were shocked – and more than a little perplexed – by the coach's brutal rebuff. Everyone, that is, except perhaps the Maori themselves, who may actually have appreciated the comments. During his polemical press conference, which was held in Opotaka, De Villiers talked about Ka Mate, a version of the haka warrior dance performed by the local Ngati Tuwharetoa tribe. The coach praised Ka Mate for its intensity and authenticity.

A Reputation That Precedes Him

For New Zealanders, this was their first real introduction to Mr. De Villier, a household name in South Africa who is as controversial as he is well known. At home, the 54-year-old coach also shoulders incredibly high expectations. The Springboks, as the South African rugby team is known, are the defending world champions. A win in this World Cup would be the team's third title – a record. It would also make the Springboks the first team in tournament history to win back-to-back World Cups.

Rugby is a very big deal in South Africa. Four years ago, when the South African captain, John Smit, received the trophy, he immediately called for President Thabo Mbeki to lift it with him. The symbol of the "rainbow nation," a white player and a black president united on the pitch, wasn't a first. Twelve years earlier, just after the end of the Apartheid, Nelson Mandela was handing the same trophy to Francois Pienaar in Johannesburg – a historical moment captured in the Clint Eastwood movie, Invictus.

Somewhat surprisingly, South Africa replaced the coach that led them to the 2007 World Cup title: Jake White. The reason? White didn't see eye to eye with the powerful South African Rugby Union (SARU), which wanted to implement a quota for black players. White thought black players should – like the famous player Bryan Habana – earn their spot based on talent. The SARU fired White and replaced him, in 2008, with De Villiers, the Springboks' first non-white coach.

Success On The Field, Controversy Off

Oregan Hoskins, the SARU president, opposed the move, but was forced to accept De Villiers because of parliamentary pressure from the ANC, Mandela's historic party. He let his disapproval be known by suggesting that rugby wasn't the only factor considered in choosing De Villiers. Other critics have echoed the sentiment, saying De Villiers earned the job because of the color of his skin, not his talent.

De Villiers' proponents disagree, saying the coach's resume speaks for itself. A former scrumhalf, De Villiers began playing rugby during the Apartheid era. He went on to coach the Under 21 team to a World Cup victory in 2005, and then, two years later led the Emerging Springboks (the B team) to a win in the Cup of Nations.

Upon taking over as coach of the national team, De Villiers gave 16 of the squad's 42 roster spots to black players. But he also convinced the white captain, John Smit, to stay on. After a difficult start, the team marked up some key victories – beating the New Zealand's powerful All Blacks, whom De Villiers called "cheats' before hand, and going on to win the 2009 Tri-Nations tournament.

Despite the team's success, the outspoken coach continues to be a lighting rod for controversy. He was caught in a media storm two years ago when he responded to criticism of black scrumhalf Ricky Januarie with thinly veiled accusations of racism.

"He made one mistake on Saturday, but so did other players," said De Villiers. "What I've learned in South Africa is the following; if you take your car to a garage to be repaired and the owner is black and he doesn't do a good job, you will never take it back there again. But if the owner is white and the garage makes a mistake, people say, never mind, he made a mistake."

Later he defended flanker Schalk Burger, a white player, who received an eight-week suspension for gouging an opponent's eye. "Rugby's a contact sport and so is dance," he said. De Villiers urged anyone who has a problem with that to visit their nearest "ballet shop" and buy a tutu.

This time, the coach's humor landed him in hot water with South Africa's sports minister, Makhenkesi Stofile, who told De Villiers to "shut up" or risk getting fired. Stofile was also uncomfortable with comments the coach made about the South African rugby player Jacobus "Bees' Roux, who was arrested last year after allegedly beating a police officer to death. De Villiers said he was "100% behind" Roux. The sports minister suggested De Villiers should hire a spokesperson as a way to stop running his mouth.

De Villiers, never known for his modesty, compares his plight to Jesus. "The same people who threw their robes on the ground when Jesus rode on a donkey, were the same people who crowned him and hit him with sticks and stuff like that," he said. "I'm not saying I'm God. I have God-given talent. I am the best I can ever be."

And if the Springboks win the World Cup? "A Boks coach who wins is a superhero," said De Villiers. "One who loses is a clown." For now, anyway, the controversial coach is still somewhere in between those two poles.

Read the original article in French (subscription may be required)

Photo - sarugby.net

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

600 Miles To Moscow? Attack? Defend? What Ukraine’s Drone Strikes In Russia Really Mean

A Ukrainian soldier from the 63 brigade was seen flying a drone as part of military training simulating an attack

Anna Akage

As they’ve done for the past year, Ukrainians have spent the past three days studying maps and calculating distances. But there's a difference now: The maps are of Russia.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

The unprecedented drone attacks this week of airfields deep inside Russian territory open a new phase in the war that is both tactical and symbolic. Though still without official confirmation from Kyiv, nobody doubts that the Ukrainian military executed the three strikes between Monday and Tuesday hundreds of kilometers inside Russia, which killed three and injured at least nine, including the strategic military air base of Engels.

Alexander Kovalenko, a Ukrainian military and political observer of the Information Resistance group, writes on his Telegram channel: "International war observers have seen that regardless of what struck the Russian airfields, it bypassed the lauded Russian air defense system and accomplished the task," he said. "They see not only that the supposed No. 2 military in the world not only drags old T-62 tanks and D-1 howitzers into the combat zone in Ukraine, but that it essentially has no air defense."

French weekly magazine L’Express declared: “Ukraine wants to show that Russian territory is not safe.”

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest