When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Economy

In Mexico, A Lesson In How Red Tape Feeds Black Markets

Mexico seems to be returning to more regulations, paperwork and taxes, which fuels the underground economy and encourages the government to overspend.

Open markets in Mexico City
Open markets in Mexico City
Luis Rubio*

MEXICO CITY — The comedian Groucho Marx used to say that politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies. Governments are particularly good at identifying technical problems, but tend to be profoundly ignorant about what motivates ordinary people. They assume people will respond to their instructions without batting an eyelid or even doubting the government's altruism.

But Mexicans have seen governments come and go for centuries, and their response has not changed: They obey without following orders. They just adapt. Human nature is stubborn but predictable, and people do not go against their interests or willingly comply with bureaucratic preferences. Therein may lie a logical explanation of the country's current, pathetic economic performance.

I have no complex mathematical models to clearly explain why the economy is performing so badly, but I observe the way the population is acting and responding to the endless parade of new norms, rules, procedures and taxes. There is one particularly telling observation: A sharp increase in use of cash.

A notary told me that cash transactions, which had practically disappeared (in good part for the tax on deposits), were making an irresistible comeback. Why? Because people are afraid their accounts and credit cards will be checked. So instead of advancing toward an increasingly efficient economy with a financial system mediating in transactions between economic agents, we are returning to bartering. Less efficiency means less economic activity. Add all the operations taking place this way nationwide, and you can imagine their impact.

The logic of a higher tax rate is that with more money in the public purse, the government can spend massively, with highly palpable results. Thousands of small transactions are thought not to have the same impact as one great public works project. That may be so in Sweden, but in Mexico even construction is in decline. Costs rise while the economy fails to respond.

Certainly, months of increased spending will make their impact down the line, but it will be less than the government imagines, and perhaps in unintended ways. It is obvious why. Because government spending is supremely inefficient. While people only spend what they can, governments overspend, often in the most absurd manner. There is furthermore no end to the corruption that people see every day — abusive trade unions, parliamentarians selling their votes, officials angling for bribes, over-generous pensions, etc. This all reinforces the public's contempt for bureaucratic "solutions."

How it all goes wrong

Instead of fomenting confidence and helping build a more efficient economy, government actions nurture the informal economy. It is an economy with privatized taxes: Inspectors, policemen and trade union chiefs pocket them personally, ensuring they never reach the treasury. Instead of simplifying tax payments and reducing the costs of creating formal enterprises, the current strategy fuels an informal sector in which businessmen have cut their costs and operate outside the government radar. This sector's logic is impeccable, but its effect is to reduce the economy's overall growth.

Current laws have considerably raised the tax burden in Mexico and paralyzed consumer spending and investment, hence the economic situation. It is not a technical problem, instead relating to human nature. In the 1970s, governments insisted on imposing their bureaucratic logic on daily living, and spent like there was no tomorrow. The results were crises, inflation and chaos. People did not — and do not — respond as the state functionary anticipates.

At the heart of it all is the inexorable contradiction between the population and government determination to plan people's lives. The sociologist Leonardo Curzio has written in his introduction to the book Tráfico de Armas en México (Arms Trafficking in Mexico) that, once, during an argument, the great painters and notorious rivals Diego Rivera and David Siqueiros took out their pistols to impose their opinions. That seems to be the logic of the government's economic strategy: impose not persuade, authority instead of leadership.

Imposition is no good in the age of globalization. The country needs order and attention to those little-big issues — like a sense of security among the population. The public response is, following an ancestral logic, to dig in its heels and pretend to implement orders. But the inevitable result of that is less economic activity, however much the government spends. Whose fault is that? Clearly, the millions of ordinary Mexicans and business owners who just don't understand the instructions they've been given!

*Luis Rubio is an economic analyst and president of the Center of Research for Development, an independent research institution devoted to the study of economic and political policy issues.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

Pelosi In Taiwan: Bold Diplomacy, Perfect Timing

"She's now the leader of the Western movement recognizing the existence of a democratic Taiwan, aiming to break Beijing's "one-China principle..." A Taiwanese political scientist argues the 19-hour visit by U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will have real lasting impact.

Nancy Pelosi and Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen

Makoto Lin/Taiwan Presidential/Planet Pix via ZUMA
Lin Zi-li

-Analysis-

TAIPEI — As many have noted, Nancy Pelosi’s recent 19-hour trip to Taiwan was the first visit to the island by a U.S. House Speaker since 1997. In the intervening 25 years, some things have changed, and others haven't.

While China is now a major world economic and military power, cross-Strait relations are similarly marked by high levels of hostility and mistrust.China still wants reunification, Taiwan still supports the status quo, and there is no room for compromise.

The question of why Pelosi insisted on visiting Taiwan despite warnings from China begins to show what drives her, and what's at stake.

Her trip was a critique of China's growing ability to shape the international order. During a much earlier visit to Beijing, in 1991, Pelosi, already a member of the U.S. Congress, was temporarily arrested by the Chinese police and expelled from the country after pulling a black banner in Tiananmen Square "dedicated to the martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the cause of democracy in China."

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ