When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Egypt

How Egypt Quashes Dissent: Sexual Violence

New Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi claims to oppose sexual violence from security forces and others, but there is bloodcurdling evidence that it is still used to silence critics.

Graffiti in Cairo
Graffiti in Cairo
Sarah Carr

CAIRO — Hend (not her real name), an outspoken political activist, is used to being watched and threatened.

She rose to prominence during Egypt's Jan. 25 revolution and says that by the end of 2011 she was regularly receiving anonymous phone threats. On the day of a planned political protest or meeting, the voice would tell her that she should prepare herself to be raped that evening.

She was temporarily banned from television appearances because of her criticism of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) and its abuses. The producers told her they feared for their own well-being if they hosted her. Someone posted a video on YouTube of fabricated pictures of Hend in sexually suggestive poses with a man.

“It was very obvious that it was created by pro-SCAF trolls,” Hend says. “My family saw the video. It was bad, and damaging, but I continued.”

Between June 2012 and July 2013, during Mohamed Morsi’s presidency, the threats stopped, but online insults continued. Whereas under SCAF’s rule the insults had focused on her honor and chastity as a woman, they began to focuse more on religion during the Morsi era. It was an important difference, and one that would figure in events to come.

Hend is not a Brotherhood member or supporter. But in the run-up to June 30 and Morsi’s removal by the military following mass protests, she said publicly that Egypt was ripe for a coup, and that she feared Brotherhood rule would be replaced by what she described as Field Marshal Abdel Fattah al-Sisi’s brand of “military religious fascism.”

She publicly denounced the August 2013 clearing of the Rabea al-Adaweya sit-in as a massacre. At this point, she says, the telephone threats started again. On social media, she was characterized as a “Brotherhood whore.” Someone tweeted her telephone number and described her as a Brotherhood supporter. Surveillance by plain-clothes men, which had started under SCAF but stopped under Morsi, intensified.

Three men on rotating four- or five-hour shifts stationed themselves outside her home, she says. They followed her. On one occasion one of the men followed her to a café, sat at the table next to her and ordered coffee.

“Then he looked me in the face and photographed me,” Hend says. “The monitoring isn’t about keeping tabs. It’s a threat to tell me that they’re watching me.”

Matters worsened at the end of 2013. She has long known that her phone was tapped, but then printouts of her emails and private online chats with her partner were slipped under her door. At the beginning of December 2013, she was asked to go to the headquarters of the National Security Agency.

“They played good cop, bad cop with me,” she recalls. “An officer said, ‘You’re educated, you can travel. Why don’t you leave the country?’ Then they told me that they had recordings of me speaking about the military during the SCAF era and that they would hand them over to the media and claim that they were made recently. ‘The people will eat you alive,’ he told me.”

On Dec. 26, Hend was alone late at night in a secluded, non-residential street in central Cairo. She remembers that it was icy cold. As she was putting things in a car she had borrowed from a friend, three men appeared from behind and grabbed her.

An entrenched problem

Women’s and human rights groups in Egypt have long argued that the country suffers from a chronic sexual harassment problem. Some of this “harassment” takes the form of serious sexual assault, most commonly mob attacks in the anonymity of large crowds. Since 2011, these assaults have occurred most often during political demonstrations.

Until recently, the Egyptian state has consistently failed to enforce laws criminalizing sexual assault. The state has even used sexual violence as the ultimate weapon to quash dissent.

Egyptian NGO Al-Nadeem Center for the Rehabilitation of the Victims of Violence and Torture has, over the years, produced numerous reports detailing the torture and sexual assault of men and women inside detention centers. Among the cases is that of Amal Farouk, who reported that she was repeatedly raped in the mid-1990s while in police custody to force her to reveal the whereabouts of her husband, who was wanted on criminal charges.

Society’s socially conservative attitude towards women and sex, and a general atmosphere of repression, combine to allow security forces to commit sexual assault with impunity.

During a May 25, 2005, demonstration by Kefaya, the Egyptian Movement for Change, Hosni Mubarak’s Interior Ministry let plain-clothes thugs loose on protesters. Female protesters were sexually assaulted while police forces penned them in. One journalist, Nawal Ali, was almost entirely stripped of her clothes under the eyes of security officials who did not intervene. The media attacked Ali and accused her of ripping her own clothes off. Last year, the African Commission for Human and Peoples’ Rights held the Egyptian government responsible for the attack and ordered it to pay compensation to the four women claimants, which the government has yet to do. Ali died in 2009.

The Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR), which filed the case with the African Commission, describes the tactics used on what was dubbed Black Wednesday as an attempt to exclude women from public life and punish them for participating in political activism.

The events of Black Wednesday were not the first of their kind. What made the assault different is that it was caught on camera, the images shocking and irrefutable.

It took place in public and in such an organized manner, leaving no doubt that it was planned and premeditated,” says Aida Seif al-Dawla, a psychiatrist with Al-Nadeem Center.

An official state tactic

But if it was a turning point, Black Wednesday marked the start of a deterioration, a clear convergence of state repression and sexual violence. It has become an established tactic that security forces continue to use against both men and women.

In March 2011, female protesters arrested in Tahrir Square were stripped and subjected to so-called virginity tests while surrounded by soldiers. Sisi, now Egypt’s president, defended the “tests,” saying that they had been done to “protect the girls from rape, and the soldiers and officers from accusations of rape.”

One of the victims, Samira Ibrahim, filed a lawsuit. But the courts eventually exonerated the military doctor who conducted the tests.

On Dec. 16, 2011, during clashes outside the cabinet building following the military dispersal of a sit-in, female detainees were “subjected to insults of a sexual nature for being present,” Egyptian women’s rights NGO Nazra said in a statement at the time.

The most notorious image that emerged from the December 2011 violence was that of a female protester knocked to the ground by army soldiers, who then proceeded to kick and stomp on her — on live television. During the attack the victim’s coat came open, revealing her bra. Commentators later questioned why she was wearing a garment that opened so easily and nothing but a bra underneath. The identity of the woman has never been revealed, and the soldiers responsible for the attack never held to account.

Hend's brutal rape

After the three men grabbed Hend, they frog-marched her toward a wall. She says that one man did all the talking. He graphically told her what was about to happen, calling her a “street dog” and threatenig to cut her genitals.

“Then he ripped my leggings open at the crotch with the knife,” Hend recalls.

The knife drew blood. The man wiped his fingers in the blood before wiping it on Hend’s mouth. He then gave the knife to the second man, she says, while the third filmed the attack with a mobile phone.

The first man instructed Hend to get down on her knees.

“He told me to kneel down in the place I belong and perform my role.”

While she was forced to perform oral sex, the second man held the knife to her neck. With his other hand, he penetrated Hend rectally.

“The man ejaculated on my face,” Hend recalls. “Then he put his penis inside me briefly and asked me which I preferred better. He told me to get up, and said that they would send the video to my ‘queer’ of a boyfriend.”

Worse over the past year

On July 1, Amnesty International issued a report saying that at least 16,000 people have been detained since Morsi’s removal. Once women are detained, Seif al-Dawla says that the use of sexual violence against them “is massive and systematic. The grabbing of breasts and sexual verbal abuse is routine.”

She points out that the degree of violence is carefully calibrated, and is less brutal towards seasoned political activists who will not remain silent.

“The detention of women is always associated with sexual harassment and sometimes assault as well,” she says. “I think what is new is not the nature of the assault as much as the carelessness and sense of impunity that the officers feel.”

Dalia Abdel Hamid, Gender and Women's Rights Program Officer at EIPR, says that sexual violence is used because of the deep-rooted notion that it can break a victim. Even if it does not break them, shame often silences victims.

But not always. On July 1, independent news website Yanair published an interview with Al-Azhar student Nada Ashraf, who says she was sexually assaulted during clashes on the university campus in December 2013. The student also gave an interview, with her face blurred, to Al Jazeera.

Ashraf said she had been trying to get to an exam but got caught up in the fierce violence between protesting students and the police. When she saw an officer grab a female student and touch her chest, Ashraf objected.

“So you think you’re a man?” the officer said to Ashraf as he grabbed her instead. “I’ll show you I’m a man, prove to you that I’m tough.”

Ashraf says the masked officer took her into a police vehicle and raped her. She was then detained for 18 days. Her lawyer advised Ashraf’s mother to forget about the incident because of the scandal.

“I am not scared, not embarrassed and not broken,” Ashraf told Yanair. “I didn’t do anything that I should feel scared or that I should hide anything. I won’t let anyone make me feel ashamed or wrong.”

Can Sisi be believed?

There was a particularly brutal mob sexual assault in Tahrir Square June 8 during celebrations of Sisi’s inauguration. After a video of it was posted online, Sisi ordered enforcement of the law against sexual harassment, an unacceptable form of conduct that he described as “alien to the best principles of Egyptian culture.”

Seif al-Dawla is skeptical of Sisi’s pronouncements, describing them as “brazen, and an insult to our anger, intelligence and memory from the same person who defended virginity testing and who, in almost every speech, flirts with Egyptian women.”

Hend says she continues to be monitored. The men have not moved from outside her house. She believes they are from the Interior Ministry because they are not from the neighborhood. They follow her, and their activity increases and decreases according to political events in the country.

On one occasion, the man who raped her telephoned to ask whether she misses him and the “taste” of him.

Hend is undergoing therapy and is on anti-depressants but says she cannot discuss the attack with her therapist because of the risk of his betraying her confidence. She is plagued by flashbacks of the assault. In mid-May, Hend received a 30-second video of part of the attack.

She says the timing was deliberate, meant to intimidate her ahead of the presidential election. Hend has no doubt about why the police chose to use sexual violence to target her.

“The police do something different with every individual,” she says. “They concentrate on the weaknesses. My weakness is that I come from a conservative family. They've got me where it hurts.”

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

eyes on the U.S.

The Weight Of Trump's Indictment Will Test The Strength Of American Democracy

The U.S. legal system cannot simply run its course in a vacuum. Presidential politics, and democracy itself, are at stake in the coming weeks and months.

The Weight Of Trump's Indictment Will Test The Strength Of American Democracy

File photo of former U.S. President Donald Trump in Clyde, Ohio, in 2020.

Emma Shortis*

-Analysis-

Events often seem inevitable in hindsight. The indictment of former U.S. President Donald Trump on criminal charges has been a possibility since the start of his presidency – arguably, since close to the beginning of his career in New York real estate.

But until now, the potential consequences of such a cataclysmic development in American politics have been purely theoretical.

Today, after much build-up in the media, The New York Times reported that a Manhattan grand jury has voted to indict Trump and the Manhattan district attorney will now likely attempt to negotiate Trump’s surrender.

The indictment stems from a criminal investigation by the district attorney’s office into “hush money” payments made to the adult film star Stormy Daniels (through Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen), and whether they contravened electoral laws.

Trump also faces a swathe of other criminal investigations and civil suits, some of which may also result in state or federal charges. As he pursues another run for the presidency, Trump could simultaneously be dealing with multiple criminal cases and all the court appearances and frenzied media attention that will come with that.

These investigations and possible charges won’t prevent Trump from running or even serving as president again (though, as with everything in the U.S. legal system, it’s complicated).

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest