When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!

SUEDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG, SUDWEST PRESSE, RHEINISCHE POST, BERLINER ZEITUNG (Germany)

Worldcrunch

Germany’s Minister of Education and Research, Prof. Dr. Annette Schavan, has criticized the University of Düsseldorf for allegedly informing the press about the results of a report on plagiarism in her doctoral thesis before she herself had been informed of the existence of the report.

"I won’t stand for it," she toldSüdwest Presse. "I now have no other option but to defend myself.”

Earlier this year, following allegations by an anonymous blogger that Schavan had plagiarized parts of her PHD dissertation -- written 32 years ago and entitled "Person and Conscience -- Studies on Conditions, Need and Requirements of Today's Consciences" -- the University opened an investigation.

The Rheinische Post quoted Schavan as saying: "At no time during work on my dissertation did I attempt to deceive."

This is not the conclusion reached by University examiners. Süddeutsche Zeitungsays the analysis states that the thesis presents "a characteristic picture of a plagiaristic modus operandi.” According to the report, text segments on 60 pages of the 351-page document show evidence of plagiarism.

"It’s a tight situation," said the Berliner Zeitung, noting that the allegations were now no longer those of an anonymous blogger but an official University position.

Dr. Ernst Dieter Rossmann, a Social Democrat Member of Parliament, said that should Schavan be stripped of her doctorate she should resign her ministerial post.

Green faction leader Renate Künast added that "the credibility that Schavan needs to lead the Ministry successfully has already been lost." Künast told the Rheinische Post that it was "shameful that Schavan wants to sit this out."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Parental Rights v. Children Rights? Why Courts Keep Getting It Wrong

Justice works around adults. Keen to uphold parental custody rights, family courts have effectively allowed violence against children by giving abusive parents access. So it is time the legal system stopped ignoring children.

Photo of a child sitting on a bench

Child sitting on a bench

Catalina Ruiz-Navarro

-OpEd-

BOGOTA — Recently a sound recording from Bogotá of a 10-year-old girl crying and pleading not to be made to live with her father went viral online. The father had faced two sets of charges relating to domestic violence and sexual abuse of the girl, who had earlier described to court doctors his inappropriate physical contact.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest

InterNations