When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Society

Daniel Buren: Master Artist Of Open Spaces Takes On The Grand Palais

Established in 2007, the Monumenta series challenges an artist to occupy the vast open space of the Grand Palais of Paris. French artist Daniel Buren has a colorful response.

(Groume)
(Groume)
Laurent Wolf

PARIS – The Grand Palais is an enormous enclosed space, 13,500 square meters (145,000 square feet) without a single obstacle on the floor, covered by a dome 35 meters (115 feet) high.

What was originally meant to be a temporary building, built for the Universal Exposition of 1900, has become an architectural fixture in the French capital. It has been used for horse shows, auto shows, congresses, fashion shows, concerts, dance, and art exhibits. And since 2007, there has been Monumenta: a carte blanche given to an artist to occupy the vast nave under the changing Parisian sky. After Anselm Kiefer, Richard Serra in 2008, Christian Boltanski in 2010 and Anish Kapoor last year, it's time for Daniel Buren to take on the challenge.

And indeed it's a challenge! Daniel Buren says that the Grand Palais is "huge public square." This public square is covered with a glass roof and its architecture is a performance. Monumenta is an exhibition like no other. Should the artist converse with the architecture, overcome it or discreetly slide into it?

Anselm Kiefer took a very traditional approach, valuable more for the pieces than for the use of space. After him, Richard Serra set up huge steel plates confronting the sky; Boltanski created a mind-blowing clothes cemetery with a crane manipulating a pile of garments, and Anish Kapoor shaped an enormous creature, frightening on the outside and welcoming inside. Each one of them turned the challenge into a conversation between the work and the Grand Palais.

In France, Daniel Buren is one of the few artists who has already faced such spaces, either in institutions like New York's Guggenheim or the Centre Pompidou in Paris, or during international exhibitions like the Skulptur Projekte of Münster. Intervention in public spaces is Buren's trademark, which he calls "in situ" pieces. Monumenta thus seemed to be just for him.

Loved and reviled

As one of the most popular – and unpopular – contemporary French artists, Buren's intervention was highly anticipated. It must be noted that he gained this dual standing thanks to his "Deux Plateaux," known by the nickname of "Buren's columns," built 26 years ago in the courtyard of the venerable Palais Royal.

The artist entitled his exhibition Excentrique(s) (eccentric), without any explanation, maybe because the confrontation with the Grand Palais is such a puzzle. He wanted above all to take advantage of the building construction, made of circles, giving birth to two rectangles which come together under a circular dome. And the result is some 100 circles, covered with colored film – blue, yellow, red, green – and fixed on 1,300 metal legs above the visitors' heads, amplifying the extent of the nave. The system is interrupted just under the dome and can be watched through big circular mirrors.

The exhibition is also eccentric because Buren succeeded in changing the way people can circulate in the Grand Palais, whose entrance is located at the level of the dome. The artist wanted the visitors to cross the nave from north to south to discover the system midway through.

At 74, Daniel Buren is perhaps the singular specialist at playing with exceptional spaces. He always succeeds in revealing the shape and function of the locations, both in his "in situ" pieces, only meant to be seen in one place, and in his "situated" pieces – that can be transformed, depending on the place. For Monumenta, Buren remains simple, effective and a little frosty by dint of deliberate intelligence and the rigor in his choices.

Fortunately, there's also the sound. Because Excentrique(s) is not only a visual exhibition. The work is accompanied by loudspeakers placed in the nave, broadcasting 37 voices giving the name of the colors in 37 different languages. The loudspeakers seem to whisper intermittently in your ear, as if a confidant suddenly appeared behind your back. It is a touch of poetry to the mechanical precision.

Read the original article in French

Photo - Groume

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

When Did Putin "Turn" Evil? That's Exactly The Wrong Question

Look back over the past two decades, and you'll see Vladimir Putin has always been the man revealed by the Ukraine invasion, an evil and sinister dictator. The Russian leader just managed to mask it, especially because so many chose to see him as a typically corrupt and greedy strongman who could be bribed or reasoned with.

Putin arrives for a ceremony to accept credentials from 24 foreign ambassadors at the Grand Kremlin Palace on Sept. 20.

Sergiy Gromenko*

-OpEd-

KYIV — The world knows that Vladimir Putin has power, money and mistresses. So why, ask some, wasn't that enough for him? Why did he have to go start another war?

At its heart, this is the wrong question to ask. For Putin, military expansion is not an adrenaline rush to feed into his existing life of luxury. On the contrary, the shedding of blood for the sake of holding power is his modus operandi, while the fruits of greed and corruption like the Putin Palace in Gelendzhik are more like a welcome bonus.

In the last year, we have kept hearing rhetorical questions like “why did Putin start this war at all, didn't he have enough of his own land?” or “he already has Gelendzhik to enjoy, why fight?” This line of thinking has resurfaced after missile strikes on Ukrainian power grids and dams, which was regarded by many as a simple demonstration of terrorism. Such acts are a manifestation of weakness, some ask, so is Putin ready to show himself weak?

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

However, you will not arrive at the correct answer if the questions themselves are asked incorrectly. For decades, analysts in Russia, Ukraine, and the West have been under an illusion about the nature of the Russian president's personal dictatorship.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ