When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

China Faces Terrorism, And The Excesses Of Anti-Terrorism

Chinese counter-terrorism forces perform an anti-terrorism drill in Beijing on May 29, 2014
Chinese counter-terrorism forces perform an anti-terrorism drill in Beijing on May 29, 2014
Nan Hao

BEIJING — Recent acts of violence in China have prompted the country to step up its anti-terrorism measures, leading the Beijing government, for example, to give police more authority to use force to stop a terror attack.

The capital’s public security bureau has given anti-terror units twice the normal amount of bullets, Beijing News reports. And officers are being allowed to shoot attackers on site, skipping previous protocols that required addressing perpetrators and firing warning shots.

But not everyone believes the war against terror should mean greater authority for law enforcement. Zhang Qianfan, a professor at Peking University Law School, says police and the military should have the power they need to stop terrorists, but that measures should be in place to prevent abuse.

"Terrorists are indeed dangerous, but uncontrolled public power is even more dangerous," he says.

China has been hit by a troubling number of terror attacks in recent months that the government blames on separatists from the western region of Xinjiang, which is home to the Uyghur ethnic group who are Muslim and speak Turkic.

In a May 1 attack at the main train station in the southwestern city of Kunming, police officers shot and killed four attackerswho used knives to kill 29 people and injure 140 more. State media have characterized that attack as "China’s 9/11," referring of course to al-Qaeda's Sept. 11, 2001, World Trade Center attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.

But police don't need any extra powers to fight terrorism, and officers can handle attackers the same way they would other violence, Zhang says. One problem with creating exceptions that apply only to terrorism is that once special rules are established, any shooting could be justified.

The recent attacks prompted the ruling Communist Party to say it will be more forceful in fighting terrorism. The official Xinhua News Agency reported that the 25-member Politburo, the party's second-highest decision-making body, decided that "China must make cracking down on violent terrorist activities its current focus of struggle so as to contain the spread of religious extremism and violent terrorist infiltration."

Efforts to improve responses to terror attacks are also apparently in motion. Police officers around the country are being given a three-month course in the use of firearms. Ordinary police in China usually do not carry guns when they appear in public.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

After Abbas: Here Are The Three Frontrunners To Be The Next Palestinian Leader

Israel and the West have often asked: Where is the Palestinian Mandela? The divided regimes between Gaza and the West Bank continues to make it difficult to imagine the future Palestinian leader. Still, these three names are worth considering.

Photo of Mahmoud Abbas speaking into microphone

Abbas is 88, and has been the leading Palestinian political figure since 2005

Thaer Ganaim/APA Images via ZUMA
Elias Kassem

Updated Dec. 5, 2023 at 12:05 a.m.

Israel has set two goals for its Gaza war: destroying Hamas and releasing hostages.

But it has no answer to, nor is even asking the question: What comes next?

The government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the return of the current Palestinian Authority to govern post-war Gaza. That stance seems opposed to the U.S. Administration’s call to revitalize the Palestinian Authority (PA) to assume power in the coastal enclave.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

But neither Israel nor the U.S. put a detailed plan for a governing body in post-war Gaza, let alone offering a vision for a bonafide Palestinian state that would also encompass the West Bank.

The Palestinian Authority, which administers much of the occupied West Bank, was created in1994 as part of the Oslo Accords peace agreement. It’s now led by President Mahmoud Abbas, who succeeded Yasser Arafat in 2005. Over the past few years, the question of who would succeed Abbas, now 88 years old, has largely dominated internal Palestinian politics.

But that question has gained new urgency — and was fundamentally altered — with the war in Gaza.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest