When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Beards, Windows, Chinese Migrants: A History Of Bizarre Taxes

Hipsters beware: beards have been on the list of unusual taxes.

What are the most absurd taxes?
What are the most absurd taxes?
Amanda Castillo

GENEVA — Governments rarely have an imagination except in one area: taxes. There was even an Emperor Vespasian who created a tax on urine, a resource that was employed at the time to treat fabric and laundry, and was even used in medicine. History is littered with such examples. Here's a glimpse at some of the most absurd ones.


Always in pursuit of money, Henry VIII started taxing subjects sporting a beard in 1535. His daughter, Elizabeth Tudor, followed his example and also instituted a tax on stubbles more than two weeks old. In Russia, Czar Peter the Great introduced a similar tax at the end of the 17th century. Bearded men received a bronze token to prove they had paid the tax. It was engraved with a drawing of the beard and the Russian words for "the tax was collected." History doesn't say whether women with beards were equally affected.

Fireplaces and windows

In England, a tax on fireplaces and windows was introduced in 1660 and 1696 respectively. Taxpayers came up with a creative response. They built fake walls to hide their chimneys and windows. This bizarre tax made homes unhygienic and triggered diseases (tuberculosis in particular began to spread easily).

The "trompe l"œil", an unexpected consequence of the tax on windows — Photo: Tim Green

Art, on the other hand, took a step forward as a result of the tax. The technique of "trompe l"œil" — the visual illusion of three dimensions in a painting — spread across cities. Concerned by the medical cost of the tax, the government of London abolished it in 1851.

Wig powder

It's Great Britain that once again had this great idea: a tax on the perfumed powder applied on wigs. Since wigs were popular, a long list of people were exempted from the tax including, most notably, the members of the royal family and their servants. This tax, which was implemented in 1795, slowly but surely changed the rules of fashion. In 1812, the number of people who paid the tax was 46,684. In 1855, it was a mere 997, signaling the waning trend. In 1869, the tax was abolished.

Chinese immigrants

To profit from Chinese immigrants constructing the large network of railroads, canals and dams in Canada, the government created a special tax on Chinese in the country in 1885, writes Alessandro Giraudo in 20 Stories To Understand The Global Economy. The tax, which reduced their numbers in Canada, was abolished in 1923.

Chinese laborers in Ontario — Photo: BiblioArchives / LibraryArchives

Pay your tax or else…

To deter tax evasion, empires got creative. In 294 AD, Emperor Diocletian published tax declarations of all citizens in the public domain so that everyone could see what their neighbor had paid and rat out evaders. He also created a special force to investigate fraud. "The investigators used torture if needed," writes Omar Fassal in A History of Financial Fraud.

They didn't hesitate to employ tactics of psychological pressure. They encouraged children to denounce their parents, wives to denounce their husbands, and slaves to denounce their masters. They increased revenue from peasants by adding children and old people to their tax base. If peasants abandoned their fields and fled, their property was forced onto neighbors — who had to foot the tax bill.


In the German city of Essen, authorities slapped a tax on owners of tanning beds (20 euros per month per machine) in 2010.


​In Denmark, a tax on fat was introduced in 2011. It targets products like butter and oil in order to encourage people to eat healthy.

Taxes have, apparently, come a long way since the days of tariffs on urine and wig powders.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


The Unsustainable Future Of Fish Farming — On Vivid Display In Turkish Waters

Currently, 60% of Turkey's fish currently comes from cultivation, also known as fish farming, compared to just 10% two decades ago. The short-sightedness of this shift risks eliminating fishing output from both the farms and the open seas along Turkey's 5,200 miles of coastline.

Photograph of two fishermen throwing a net into the Tigris river in Turkey.

Traditional fishermen on the Tigris river, Turkey.

Dûrzan Cîrano/Wikimeidia
İrfan Donat

ISTANBUL — Turkey's annual fish production includes 515,000 tons from cultivation and 335,000 tons came from fishing in open waters. In other words, 60% of Turkey's fish currently comes from cultivation, also known as fish farming.

It's a radical shift from just 20 years ago when some 600,000 tons, or 90% of the total output, came from fishing. Now, researchers are warning the current system dominated by fish farming is ultimately unsustainable in the country with 8,333 kilometers (5,177 miles) long.

Professor Mustafa Sarı from the Maritime Studies Faculty of Bandırma 17 Eylül University believes urgent action is needed: “Why were we getting 600,000 tons of fish from the seas in the 2000’s and only 300,000 now? Where did the other 300,000 tons of fish go?”

Professor Sarı is challenging the argument from certain sectors of the industry that cultivation is the more sustainable approach. “Now we are feeding the fish that we cultivate at the farms with the fish that we catch from nature," he explained. "The fish types that we cultivate at the farms are sea bass, sea bram, trout and salmon, which are fed with artificial feed produced at fish-feed factories. All of these fish-feeds must have a significant amount of fish flour and fish oil in them.”

That fish flour and fish oil inevitably must come from the sea. "We have to get them from natural sources. We need to catch 5.7 kilogram of fish from the seas in order to cultivate a sea bream of 1 kg," Sarı said. "Therefore, we are feeding the fish to the fish. We cannot cultivate fish at the farms if the fish in nature becomes extinct. The natural fish need to be protected. The consequences would be severe if the current policy is continued.”

Keep reading...Show less

The latest