When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
China 2.0

In China's Shoe Business, Pitfalls Of Copycat Design

Shoe shop in Haikou, Hainan Province.
Shoe shop in Haikou, Hainan Province.
Duan Linna

BEIJING — Summer shopping included the hunt for a new pair of sandals, which was also an opportunity to take stock in where the Chinese shoe industry stands.

In itself, it is not surprising to find a "cohabitation" of different quality from different brands in a single shopping center. It's also natural that different brands target different customers, at different price points. The problem with Chinese shoes companies runs deeper: the blatent copying of designs from foreign brands.

One example: an ingenious design of the heels of the wedge sandals from the French brand Chloé appear identically in a large number of Chinese brands' summer collections this year.

Design is intellectual property. It’s the expression of a person's intelligence and creativity, and it should be protected. When such copycat behavior becomes commonplace, it not only is an act of unfair competition and unjust enrichment, but also discourages business culture from innovating.

The net result is that the Chinese footwear industry will fail to upgrade and will be shut out of international competition.

10 billion shoes

It might be true in China’s fast-moving consumer goods industry that such breach of copyright is openly tolerated, which allows original and copycat to “harmoniously coexist.” But this phenomenon underestimates female consumers’ ability to distinguish the real from the fake, and will ultimately be fatal for the copying brand.

China's shoemakers must commit instead to move up from low-end processing factories to independent manufacturers of shoes with their own brands and design.

Today, China has the world’s biggest shoe manufacturing industry. Each year, it produces 10 billion pairs of shoes, which represents two-thirds of the world’s annual production. Yet, few Chinese shoemakers are able to turn out a high-end brand design of their own. Chinese footwear businesses find themselves in a fierce competition, not only with their peers in China, but also with those in India, Indonesia and Vietnam.

Although a business environment that encourages innovation and protects intellectual property is yet to be established in China, the rules of the game are not going to change. And more and more Chinese consumers are starting to set the bar high before they commit to a brand. And the key to gain such allegiance is in the design. The recognition of a certain style is the first step to establish consumer loyalty, particularly for fast-moving consumer goods industries such as footwear.

A female consumer can recognize in a pair of shoes both the designer and the brand. It is often sewn in with shoemakers' hundred years of history, like an invisible patent that raises the value of the brand.

China’s economic growth will ever more rely on domestic consumption, as rural as well as urban area’s average income has grown 10-12% in 2013. And Chinese people with greater purchasing power are looking for products with better quality and stronger identity.

A Chinese consumer buys only 2.5 pairs of shoes per year on average, far behind the average 7.5 pairs in the United States. This implies a huge potential for China’s domestic shoe market. Valuing independent design and promoting the brand must be the golden rules for Chinese shoemakers to seize the opportunity in the booming economy.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

Lex Tusk? How Poland’s Controversial "Russian Influence" Law Will Subvert Democracy

The new “lex Tusk” includes language about companies and their management. But is this likely to be a fair investigation into breaking sanctions on Russia, or a political witch-hunt in the business sphere?

Photo of President of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda

Polish President Andrzej Duda

Piotr Miaczynski, Leszek Kostrzewski

-Analysis-

WARSAW — Poland’s new Commission for investigating Russian influence, which President Andrzej Duda signed into law on Monday, will be able to summon representatives of any company for inquiry. It has sparked a major controversy in Polish politics, as political opponents of the government warn that the Commission has been given near absolute power to investigate and punish any citizen, business or organization.

And opposition politicians are expected to be high on the list of would-be suspects, starting with Donald Tusk, who is challenging the ruling PiS government to return to the presidency next fall. For that reason, it has been sardonically dubbed: Lex Tusk.

University of Warsaw law professor Michal Romanowski notes that the interests of any firm can be considered favorable to Russia. “These are instruments which the likes of Putin and Orban would not be ashamed of," Romanowski said.

The law on the Commission for examining Russian influences has "atomic" prerogatives sewn into it. Nine members of the Commission with the rank of secretary of state will be able to summon virtually anyone, with the powers of severe punishment.

Under the new law, these Commissioners will become arbiters of nearly absolute power, and will be able to use the resources of nearly any organ of the state, including the secret services, in order to demand access to every available document. They will be able to prosecute people for acts which were not prohibited at the time they were committed.

Their prerogatives are broader than that of the President or the Prime Minister, wider than those of any court. And there is virtually no oversight over their actions.

Nobody can feel safe. This includes companies, their management, lawyers, journalists, and trade unionists.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest