When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
CLARIN

Sourcing That Mango: Blockchain Brings Transparency To Food Supplies

The information storage technology can safeguard entire transaction histories and allow firms and consumers to see where food ingredients came from — and fast.

Birds keep track of these crops in Argentina
Birds keep track of these crops in Argentina

BUENOS AIRES It was the central subject of a farming conference this month in Argentina: How can blockchain help the agriculture sector? Blockchain is a data structure where information is kept in linked blocks, each of which contains the cryptographic hash of the previous block. This means any change of information in one block would alter data in subsequent blocks.

Luis Macias of Grainchain Inc., and Martin Hagelstrom of IBM, explained that their respective firms are testing some of the benefits the technology can have in supporting food supplies.

Macias says blockchain "helps us decentralize processes." Grainchain, a UK-based "ag-tech" platform for commodities trading that uses blockchain, offers users the possibility to make well-protected contracts between buyer and seller and ease the process of signature between people who don't know each other. "It is a very efficient ecosystem that allows you to qualify each transaction," says Macias, the company's founder. "Users can be certain they will receive the grain or will be paid."

Macias says that when a "buyer goes out looking to buy, our system shows him all available variables automatically, and the user can modify the variable as he or she wants. A trust fund is created in a bank, in a currency of the buyer's choice. All the money is in that fund and payment is only made when the buyer has received the grains."

They went from requiring six days to barely two seconds.

Trust and transparency are the key words in understanding blockchain's benefits, but also efficiency and easier traceability. Hagelstrom says blockchain allows for interaction between various participants inside a business network. "It allows for a single version of the truth. If there is only a single register that can be seen in real time, the process becomes more efficient and cheaper," he explained. The system IBM is creating, he said, is designed to register every step of a product's supply chain.

IBM's first experiences were with mangos in Mexico. They went from requiring six days to barely two seconds, to determine the origin of every product offered on Walmart shelves. Hagelstrom cites two benefits: "traceability and certificate management." He said many firms were now incorporating blockchain, and this could help create a crucial network effect. "As technology, it is ideal when there are many participants, when there's an ecosystem. It can help generate trust," he says.

Hagelstrom is optimistic on the technology's increasing use in Argentina, beginning with "something small, then showing results and growing from there." Firms, he said, could "join these networks within five years or start helping to build them today. All the information already exists and each actor in the chain gives it to the next or previous actor in the chain. Right now we're standardizing the information and making it available for the entire chain and the consumer."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Who Is Responsible For The Internet's Harm To Society?

A school in the US is suing social media giants for damage done to children's well-being. But fining tech giants is a feeble response to their attacks on society's welfare.

a young boy looking at a smartphone

Are parents, website owners or government oversight bodies for to blame for the damage done to children and young adults?

Mónica Graiewski

BUENOS AIRES - In January 2023, schools in Seattle in the United States took court action against the websites TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube and Snapchat, seeking damages for losses incurred from the psychological harm done to their pupils.

They maintained that behavioral anomalies such as anxiety, depression and eating disorders were impeding pupils' education and had forced schools to hire mental health experts, develop special educational plans and provide extra training for teachers.

Here in Argentina just days after that report, two teenagers died from taking part in the so-called "blackout challenge" on TikTok.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest