In Poland, Shale Gas Fuels Dreams Of Energy Independence

Polish authorities are giving an enthusiastic thumbs-up to shale gas, a controversial yet potentially lucrative source of fuel that could free the country from relying on historical rival Russia for its gas needs.

Poland's foreign minister, Radoslaw Skiroski, discusses shale gas during a May 18 forum in Warsaw
Poland's foreign minister, Radoslaw Skiroski, discusses shale gas during a May 18 forum in Warsaw
Piotr Smolar

WARSAW - Ask any Polish person about what might be hiding below the country's surface and may trigger a euphoric reaction. Some are talking about an El Dorado. Others are dreaming of enough wealth to fund a Norwegian-style development boom.

The frenzy is not about gold, diamonds or oil, but about gas – shale gas to be precise. According to some estimates, Poland may be sitting on one of Europe's largest deposits of the trendy but controversial fuel source.

So far Poland is still in an exploratory phase. But the government, led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, and the companies involved in gas exploration are already gushing with enthusiasm. For now, the growing environmental questions don't seem to be a concern for Polish leaders. Nor are they particularly fazed by France's current moratorium on shale gas.

Celebrated by some as an exciting new source of relatively clean fuel, shale gas – natural gas produced from shale rock – also has its detractors. Environmental groups warn that shale gas contributes more to global warming than does conventional natural gas. The extraction process can also lead to groundwater contamination, say critics.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates Poland's reserves at some 5.3 trillion cubic meters, but this highly optimistic figure appears to be based on a geological simulation. Other estimations put the reserves at just 1 billion cubic meters. A precise figure will likely take a few more years to emerge. This gives companies that have already obtained exploration licences time to decide on the technological means they intend to use during the industrial phase.

The stakes are enormous for Poland. Shale gas could allow the central European country to become a net exporter of energy and break free of its dependence on Russian natural gas (the Russian Gazprom company covers 70% of Poland's needs). The revenue obtained from a shale gas industry could finance new infrastructure projects. Shale gas could also help the country gain more geopolitical weight.

Poland is not the only country in the European Union to be tempted by the promises of shale gas. Lithuania's total dependence on Russia, triggered by the closing of the Ignalina nuclear plant in 2009, is pushing the small Baltic country towards shale gas exploration as well.

"Shale gas has become a hope, a symbol of development, of energy security," explains Iwo Los from Greenpeace in Poland. "Every one of the candidates in last year's presidential election spoke about it. But no one mentions the lack of information about potential dangers, or the fact that the government has been handing out licences to foreign companies."

Most of the companies involved are American: Chevron, ExxonMobil, Lane Energy, and others. Total, a French company, is partnering with ExxonMobil for two concessions in southeast Poland's Lublin Basin. A Polish corporation called PGNiG is also involved in exploration. "We have already drilled in two places, going more than three kilometers underground," says Joanna Zakrzewska, a PGNiG spokesperson. "Drills are very expensive, each costing between 20 and 30 million zlotys (5 to 8 million dollars). But we consider this an enormous opportunity."

The dominant role being played by foreign companies has drawn criticisms from some sectors in Poland. A total of 80 concessions have been awarded, each measuring on average 1,000 square kilometers, with a geological and mining law now being considered by Parliament stipulating that these concessions are permanent. "A quarter of the Polish territory has been given to these companies," says Zbigniew Tynenski, head of the Center for Sustainable Development in Lodz. "Here we have a neo-colonial situation."

Prime Minister Donald Tusk dismisses such criticism as unfounded. He also complains about how France and other European countries "lobby" against shale gas. "The risks for the environment depend on what kind of techniques you are using," says Michal Boni, a member of the council of ministers and one of Mr. Tusk's closest advisers. "There is no point in talking about it at this stage."

How high is the price Poland is willing to pay for its energy independence? "Our country is catching up with the rest of Europe," says Boni. "If we had to choose between building highways and protecting the environment, I would personally chose the highways, and try to minimize any negative impact at the same time. Of course we take the environmental aspect into consideration, but we have to think about what a balanced development would mean to us."

Before moving into the extraction phase, the government must first draft new laws to regulate the industry and determine, among other things, how future revenue will be spent. "If we banned the exploration of new deposits for fear of extracting them it would be like going back to the Middle Ages," says Jerzy Nawrocki, director of the government-linked Polish Geological Institute. "We should not generalize the risks posed to the environment. Geological conditions vary from one country to another."

Unlike in France, Poland's shale gas deposits lie very deep underground, which means the risk of polluting ground water is very low, according to the Institute. But in order to benefit from its shale gas reserves, Poland has to overcome two important hurdles that the United States, a pioneer of the industry, never had to worry about: the density of its population (three times superior to that of the United States) and the enormous quantities of water needed for extraction.

Nawrocki dismisses any concerns about the possible risks. "Poland is right in this matter," he says. "This is not contradictory with looking for an alternative source of energy."

Shale gas is part of a medium-term energy strategy, as it would satisfy interim energy needs while Poland gradually phases out coal plants and builds the infrastructure for a viable nuclear power industry, says Nawrocki. Poland does not have any nuclear plants for the time being, but it is planning to build two – at a cost of 25 billion euros (36 billion dollars), according to Donald Tusk.

The prime minister is not at all swayed by the recent Japanese catastrophe at Fukushima. "We should not succumb to hysteria: the nuclear menace in Japan was not caused by any technical failure in the nuclear plant. It was caused by an earthquake and a tsunami," Mr. Tusk insisted.

The Polish Parliament is expected to adopt a law on the matter by the end of this year. The government plans to announce a site and builder for the project by 2013, and begin producing nuclear-power electricity by 2020.

Photo - Poland MFA

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

Paying tribute to the victims of the attack in Kongsberg

Terje Bendiksby/NTB Scanpix/ZUMA
Carl-Johan Karlsson

The bow-and-arrow murder of five people in the small Norwegian city of Kongsberg this week was particularly chilling for the primitive choice of weapon. And police are now saying the attack Wednesday night is likely to be labeled an act of terrorism.

Still, even though the suspect is a Danish-born convert to Islam, police are still determining the motive. Espen Andersen Bråthen, a 37-year-old Danish national, is previously known to the police, both for reports of radicalization, as well as erratic behavior unrelated to religion.

Indeed, it remains unclear whether religious beliefs were behind the killings. In an interview with Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter, police attorney Ann Iren Svane Mathiassens said Bråthen has already confessed to the crimes, giving a detailed account of the events during a three-hour interrogation on Thursday, but motives are yet to be determined.

Investigated as terrorism 

Regardless, the murders are likely to be labeled an act of terror – mainly as the victims appear to have been randomly chosen, and were killed both in public places and inside their homes.

Mathiassens also said Bråthen will undergo a comprehensive forensic psychiatric examination, which is also a central aspect of the ongoing investigation, according to a police press conference on Friday afternoon. Bråthen will be held in custody for at least four weeks, two of which will be in isolation, and will according to a police spokesperson be moved to a psychiatric unit as soon as possible.

Witnesses have since described him as unstable and a loner.

Police received reports last year concerning potential radicalization. In 2017, Bråthen published two videos on Youtube, one in English and one in Norwegian, announcing that he's now a Muslim and describing himself as a "messenger." The year prior, he made several visits to the city's only mosque, where he said he'd received a message from above that he wished to share with the world.

Previous criminal history 

In 2012, he was convicted of aggravated theft and drug offenses, and in May last year, a restraining order was issued after Bråthen entered his parents house with a revolver, threatening to kill his father.

The mosque's chairman Oussama Tlili remembers Bråthen's first visit well, as it's rare to meet Scandinavian converts. Still, he didn't believe there was any danger and saw no reason to notify the police. Tlili's impression was rather that the man was unwell mentally, and needed help.

According to a former neighbor, Bråthen often acted erratically. During the two years she lived in the house next to him — only 50 meters from the grocery store where the attacks began — the man several times barked at her like a dog, threw trash in the streets to then pick it up, and spouted racist comments to her friend. Several other witnesses have since described him as unstable and a loner.

The man used a bow and arrow to carry the attack

Haykon Mosvold Larsen/NTB Scanpix/ZUMA

Police criticized

Norway, with one of the world's lowest crime rates, is still shaken from the attack — and also questioning what allowed the killer to hunt down and kill even after police were on the scene.

The first reports came around 6 p.m. on Wednesday that a man armed with bow and arrow was shooting inside a grocery store. Only minutes after, the police spotted the suspect; he fired several times against the patrol and then disappeared while reinforcements arrived.

The attack has also fueled a long-existing debate over whether Norwegian police should carry firearms

In the more than 30 minutes that followed before the arrest, four women and one man were killed by arrows and two other weapons — though police have yet to disclose the other arms, daily Aftenposten reports. The sleepy city's 27,000 inhabitants are left wondering how the man managed to evade a full 22 police patrols, and why reports of his radicalization weren't taken more seriously.

With five people killed and three more injured, Wednesday's killing spree is the worst attack in Norway since far-right extremist Anders Breivik massacred 77 people on the island of Utøya a decade ago.

Unarmed cops

As questions mount over the police response to the attack, with reports suggesting all five people died after law enforcement made first contact with the suspect, local police have said it's willing to submit the information needed to the Bureau of Investigation to start a probe into their conduct. Police confirmed they had fired warning shots in connection to the arrest which, under Norwegian law, often already provides a basis for an assessment.

Wednesday's bloodbath has also fueled a long-existing debate over whether Norwegian police should carry firearms — the small country being one of only 19 globally where law enforcement officers are typically unarmed, though may have access to guns and rifles in certain circumstances.

Magnus Ranstorp, a terrorism expert and professor at the Swedish Defence University, noted that police in similar neighboring countries like Sweden and Denmark carry firearms. "I struggle to understand why Norwegian police are not armed all the time," Ranstorp told Norwegian daily VG. "The lesson from Utøya is that the police must react quickly and directly respond to a perpetrator during a life-threatening incident."

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!