When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
eyes on the U.S.

How Airbus Plans To Cash In On Its Alabama Gamble

The European airplane giant has just opened its first U.S. assembly plant in Mobile, Alabama. Airbus is banking on lower labor costs and an aging American aircraft fleet.

The inauguration of Airbus plant in Mobile on Sep. 14.
The inauguration of Airbus plant in Mobile on Sep. 14.
Bruno Trévidic

PARIS — Was it wise to invest $600 million to build an A320 assembly plant just to be able to win a few more orders in what used to be the exclusive territory of its chief rival, Boeing?

Fabrice Brégier, the CEO of Airbus, has no doubt. Sure, there was the attraction of both lower employee benefit costs and lower tax rates in Alabama than in Europe, as well as the advantages to increased production in dollars to guard against currency fluctuations.

But most of all, it's the unique prospects of the American market that convinced Airbus to set up shop in Mobile, Alabama. "The social costs didn't come into consideration," the Airbus CEO says. "Otherwise, we would have gone to Mexico."

Even if air traffic increases by only 2% in North America, the region will still remain the world's most important aeronautics market for a long time to come. According to the latest study by Airbus, U.S. companies, which have the oldest fleet in the world after those in Africa, will need 5,880 new aircrafts over the next 20 years, including 4,730 single aisle aircraft, for a total value of $751 billion.

Yet, still today, Airbus' market share in North America is only 20%, against 50% globally. If, as the European aircraft manufacturer hopes, making planes in the U.S. allows it to gain so much as 10 market share points over 20 years, the $600 million invested in Mobile will easily pay for itself.

The outstanding question remains: will the "Made in America" feature of the Airbus output make the difference? Airbus notes that since the announcement of the project in 2012, it has won bids on 40% of American orders.

Still, nothing proves that these results are linked to the Alabama project. Delta Airlines, the geographically-closest to Alabama, did indeed order 30 A321s from Airbus, but also about 100 B737s from Boeing. United also preferred the Boeing 737. As for Airbus' biggest order — 260 A320s from American Airlines —it came before the Mobile announcement.

Lunch still included

But what seems certain is the fact that making planes in the U.S., under the same conditions as its rival Boeing, can't do any harm. These basic economics also appear clear to Boeing, which has just announced that it will open its first industrial site in China, to produce the interior fittings of its 737.

Despite the additional price of transporting parts, the Mobile plant, will eventually be as competitive as the large plant in Toulouse, France, which CEO Brégier says comes thanks most of all to the difference in staff costs.

In the event of a drop off in activity, Airbus will have an adjustment variable that offers endlessly fewer constraints than those faced in European industrial policy. Despite efforts by IAM, the major industrial union, to establish itself there, there are still no unions in Mobile and labor protections are still far fewer. The employer doesn't even have to pay for employees' lunch breaks.

Airbus hasn't gone that far, but it is clear that the aircraft manufacturer will be far less reluctant to hire new workers in Alabama than it would be in France or Germany.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


The West Has An Answer To China's New Silk Road — With A Lift From The Gulf

The U.S. and Europe are seeking to rival China by launching a huge joint project. Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States will also play a key role – because the battle for world domination is not being fought on China’s doorstep, but in the Middle East.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Indian Prime Minister Narendra and U.S. President Joe Biden shaking hands during PGII & India-Middle East-Europe Economics Corridor event at the G20 Summit on Sept. 9 in New Delhi

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Indian Prime Minister Narendra and U.S. President Joe Biden during PGII & India-Middle East-Europe Economics Corridor event at the G20 Summit on Sept. 9 in New Delhi

Daniel-Dylan Böhmer


BERLIN — When world leaders are so keen to emphasize the importance of a project, we may well be skeptical. “This is a big deal, a really big deal,” declared U.S. President Joe Biden earlier this month.

The "big deal" he's talking about is a new trade and infrastructure corridor planned to be built between India, the Middle East and Europe.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi described the project as a “beacon of cooperation, innovation and shared progress,” while President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen called it a “green and digital bridge across continents and civilizations."

The corridor will consist of improved railway networks, shipping ports and submarine cables. It is not only India, the U.S. and Europe that are investing in it – they are also working together on the project with Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United Arab Emirates.

Saudi Arabia is planning to provide $20 billion in funding for the corridor, but aside from that, the sums involved are as yet unclear. The details will be hashed out over the next two months. But if the West and its allies truly want to compete with China's so-called New Silk Road, they will need a lot of money.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest