When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

eyes on the U.S.

Adios Banana Republics! Brazil Firm Buys 'Colonial' Chiquita

The emblematic U.S. banana firm, a confidante of 20th century Latin American regimes, with a long history of mistreating workers, tried in vain to avoid falling into Brazilian hands.

Cutrale-Safra, a Brazilian firm, has finalized the purchase of Chiquita.
Cutrale-Safra, a Brazilian firm, has finalized the purchase of Chiquita.

-OpEd-

BUENOS AIRES — It was never just about bananas. Chiquita Brands became, in the 20th century, a symbol of a quintessentially cynical colonialism most often attributed to the United States. It had a part in ensuring that many Latin American states became known as — and perhaps remained — "banana republics."

But now, a Brazilian firm, Cutrale-Safra, has finalized the purchase of Chiquita.

Chiquita Brands International was founded in 1871 by the railroad entrepreneur Henry Meiggs. It used to be called the United Fruit Company and was based in Charlotte, North Carolina. It became in time the world's premier banana firm, taking control of some one-third of the world's banana business.

In 2000, it lost its top position to Dole Foods, though its name remained engraved in the histories of states where it set up shop: Honduras, Panama, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Ecuador, Colombia, Nicaragua and Mexico.

In these countries, the firm did not so much build itself a reputation as earn notoriety. It was only in the early years of this century that Chiquita agreed to negotiate a collective pact with banana workers unions, and abide by an international framework on minimum standards of work and union rights.

The Peron showdown

Until then, many considered its history a shameful litany of dirty dealings and political interventions. In 1928, for example, the military shot dead thousands of the firm's employees in Colombia after they protested over poor working conditions. In 1975, a Securities and Exchange Commission probe found that Chiquita (then known as United Brands) had bribed the Honduran President Oswaldo López Arellano — that affair was branded "Bananagate."

Echoes of its malfeasance also reached here in Argentina. In 1948, the former U.S. ambassador in Buenos Aires, Spruille Braden, a symbol of opposition to the populist president Juan Perón — Evita's husband — became a lobbyist for Chiquita in Central America.

Since the 1980s, the firm has been in a showdown with the European Union, which has ruled that the firm has abused its dominant market position.

It is a long story with an unexpected ending. On Tuesday, it was announced that the Brazilian consortium Cutrale-Safra had bought Chiquita for $1.3 billion, after a battle for control that lasted three months. The U.S. firm, showing its last gasps of pride, rejected three previous purchase offers, even trying to merge with its rival Fyffes Plc. to avoid falling into Brazilian hands.

The purchase is a victory for the Brazilian banker of Lebanese origin, Joseph Safra, and the "orange magnate" José Luis Cutrale, who joined forces to add Chiquita to their juice and soybeans empire. Chiquita shares had risen 40% when Cutrale-Safra announced in August their intention to buy it. That eventually led shareholders to overrule Chiquita's chairman Kerri Anderson, who resisted to the last minute the latest Brazilian offer for a business with an annual turnover of some $7 billion.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

How South American Oceans Can Sway The U.S.-China Showdown

As global rivalries and over-fishing impact the seas around South America, countries there must find a common strategy to protect their maritime backyards.

RIMPAC 2022

Juan Gabriel Tokatlian

-Analysis-

BUENOS AIRES — As the U.S.-China rivalry gathers pace, oceans matter more than ever. This is evident just looking at the declarations and initiatives enacted concerning the Indian and Pacific oceans.

Yet there is very little debate in South America on the Sino-American confrontation and its impact on seas around South America, specifically the South-Eastern Pacific (SEP) and South-Western Atlantic (SWA). These have long ceased to be empty spaces — and their importance to the world's superpowers can only grow.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ