You've reached your limit of free articles.
To read the full story, start your free trial today.
Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.
Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.
Already a subscriber? Log in
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres at Egypt's El Arish International Airport, as part of his late October visit to the Middle East.
Pointing fingers
Antonio Guterres announced a procedure this week that hadn't been used for half a century: Article 99 of the UN Charter, to “bring any matter to the attention” of the Security Council.
It may seem trivial, but it is the equivalent of a loud alarm in the hushed language of diplomacy. The United Arab Emirates seized on this initiative to table a draft resolution submitted to the Security Council, demanding a ceasefire and reiterating their “call on all parties to abide by their obligations under international law.”
And it can’t be so trivial if the Israeli Foreign Minister, Elie Cohen, responded by saying the Secretary-General’s initiative constitutes: “support for the terrorist organization Hamas.” Is that all! Cohen accused Guterres directly of being “a danger to world peace.”
The UN has no autonomous means to lead any action without consensus.
The reason for this overreaction is that what is happening at the UN may put Israel’s U.S. ally in a compromising position: Will the Biden administration, which criticizes the number of civilians killed in Gaza, veto a resolution calling for a ceasefire? The battle of world opinion would well and truly be lost for Washington.
UN's limits
What can the United Nations do? Almost nothing, to be honest, except to give moral support to a ceasefire request. The UN has no autonomous means to lead any action without consensus.
But Guterres’ gesture has the merit of forcing all actors of international life to face their responsibilities. It won't stop the fighting immediately, but in a world where the battle is also about "narratives," it counts.
It also allows us to reflect on a failing global governance. The League of Nations had failed to prevent World War II, and was replaced by the United Nations.
Today, the UN is showing its limits, and will have to be replaced or reformed: this means reducing the application of the veto and reinforcing the organization’s representativeness and capacity for taking concrete action. Without an effective international body, we must be ready to accept that the law of the strongest will forever prevail. That, we should remember, is the law of the jungle
- My Gaza Diary: The Massacre Has Resumed, Nowhere To Hide ›
- The United Nations — "Uncomfortable Witness" To Occupation, Virtual Enemy In Israel ›
- Is The UN Security Council Destined To Disappear? ›
