When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Ya Ya, Between A Broken Heart And Big Chill In Giant Panda Diplomacy

This is the story of Ya Ya, a female panda whose fate captures for the degrading relationship and eroding trust between China and the U.S.

photo of a giant panda walking

Ya Ya upon her return to China

Yan Fujing/Xinhua via ZUMA
Pierre Haski


Ya Ya, a Chinese Giant Panda, had been living at the Memphis Zoo in the United States for 20 years, beginning back in the days when the relationship between Beijing and Washington was far more cordial. Her arrival was part of what's known as "panda diplomacy", when Beijing lent out its beloved signature animals as a sign of friendship.

Ya Ya was in a relationship, if we can use this term, with Le Le, a male panda. But Le Le died in 2021, from heart complications, and Ya Ya never seemed to recover from his death. She started to lose weight, her coat faded. This is when politics flared up.

Photos of Ya Ya looking rather ragged began to circulate in China, and the Americans were immediately accused of abuse. A public clamor began to mount: Ya Ya should be repatriated, demanded nationalists and animal rights activists. So last Thursday, Ya Ya landed back in China onboard a special flight, every movement followed by hundreds of millions of Chinese on social media. Her arrival in Shanghai was like that of a national hero celebrity.

An object of worship 

Why did this case turn into a political cause célèbre in China? Yes, because it's the United States; and because it's about pandas. The recent deterioration of relations means that everything takes on a symbolic dimension; and the national animal species panda had no chance of escaping it.

On social media in China, users posted photos of pandas living in Russia that appeared to be in much better condition. We can also recall that China has just given back to the French Zoo of Beauval, the only one in France to have two pandas, the right to keep them for three more years, for a substantial rental fee. The director of the Beauval Zoo accompanied Emmanuel Macron to China last month, a sign that this is indeed a matter of state.

The giant panda is the object of worship in China, on a dedicated website, we can follow 24-7 the life of pandas filmed by a webcam in Sichuan, their region of origin. When the species was threatened with extinction, the efforts of researchers to arouse the pandas' low libido were known to all: they tried everything, porn tapes and even viagra. Now that the giant pandas are out of immediate danger of extinction, it is not to let them die at the hands of American imperialists.

Xi and Macron

Xi Jinping pointing to something as he talks to Emmanuel Macron

Xi and Macron on the French President's visit to China last month where he sought to soften tensions.

Huang Jingwen/Xinhua via ZUMA

Decoupling blues

This all comes as Sino-American relations have indeed been deteriorating for the past four years. From Donald Trump to Joe Biden, tough anti-China stance is a bipartisan subject.

Last week, White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan outlined a U.S. doctrine in a major speech. In particular, he echoed a nuance stated last month by Ursula Von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission by stating the U.S. wants to reduce the risk with China, but does not have a desire for “decoupling."

This means cutting ties in advanced technologies that affect U.S. security, but no desire to interrupt the flow of business, which in fact continues to grow. This nuance may seem like some as an olive branch, a sort of timid outreach like Janet Yellen, the Treasury Secretary, did a week ago.

Beijing has yet to react, and it will be interesting to see if Xi Jinping sees it as positive gesture, a small opening after weeks of verbal escalation. But as we can see by Ya Ya's return, decoupling is in the air — this time on Beijing's side.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Why Poland's Break With Ukraine Weakens All Enemies Of Russia — Starting With Poland

Poland’s decision to stop sending weapons to Ukraine is being driven by the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party's short-term electoral calculus. Yet the long-term effects on the world stage could deeply undermine the united NATO front against Russia, and the entire Western coalition.

Photo of ​Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Polish President Andrzej Duda in Lutsk, Ukraine, on July 9

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Polish President Andrzej Duda in Lutsk, Ukraine, on July 9

Bartosz T. Wieliński


WARSAW — Poland has now moved from being the country that was most loudly demanding that arms be sent to Ukraine, to a country that has suddenly announced it was withholding military aid. Even if Poland's actions won't match Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki’s words, the government has damaged the standing of our country in the region, and in NATO.

“We are no longer providing arms to Ukraine, because we are now arming Poland,” the prime minister declared on Polsat news on Wednesday evening. He didn’t specify which type of arms he was referring to, but his statement was quickly spread on social media by leading figures of the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

When news that Poland would be withholding arms to Ukraine made their way to the headlines of the most important international media outlets, no politician from PiS stepped in to refute the prime minister’s statement. Which means that Morawiecki said exactly what he meant to say.

The era of tight Polish-Ukrainian collaboration, militarily and politically, has thus come to an end.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest