When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital MagazineNEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Geopolitics

Can Macron's "Creative" Diplomacy Fix The Rift Between The West And Global South?

French President Emmanuel Macron has called a unique summit that aims to reset relations between Western countries and the Global South. But the message from China and Russia will be not to trust such diplomatic maneuverings.

Chairman of the Transitional Military Council of Chad Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno (C) arrives at the Palais Brogniart for the New Global Financial Pact Summit in Paris, France.

A Paris summit is bringing 50 heads of state and government together to form a new global financial pact.

Pierre Haski

-Analysis-

PARIS“France has creative diplomacy.”

The admiration came from a European leader after last month's political community summit in Moldova that included Ukraine and a wide range of European countries — a gathering first proposed by Emmanuel Macron.

A different kind of summit is opening Thursday in Paris, bringing together 50 heads of state and government to form a new global financial pact. Some heavyweights present include Chinese Premier Li Qiang and Brazilian President Lula.

Readers who are not particularly impressed with this latest act of French diplomacy will be forgiven. To quote General Charles de Gaulle when he was criticizing the United Nations, "What are these 'things' for?"

The results of such high-level diplomatic events are not always glorious, or even entirely effective. The Paris Climate Agreement is one such example, but there are several others where words and displays of support have not been followed by any significant effects. And the current state of the world is not conducive to optimism.

But the stakes of each diplomatic event, given the current state of the world, are considerable. And rather than being ignored, they should be examined with the care with which one would treat someone seriously ill.


Global poverty rising again 

The concrete issue guiding the summit was the financing mechanisms for the poorest countries in the world. Each of them was not helped by the triple shock of COVID, from which they have not yet recovered, the impact of the war in Ukraine, which has only heightened inflation and interest rates, and the more structural issue of the climate crisis.

“The global poverty that had been considerably decreasing, has begun its rise once again,” Nobel laureate and economist Esther Duflo told France Inter in an interview. The World Bank estimates that 14 out of the 28 poorest countries in the world are threatened with defaulting on their debt — and this will be one of the focal points of the summit.

But the fundamental issue is a political one: it is the direct consequence of a gap that emerged between the West and the “Global South” since the beginning of the war in Ukraine.

The Russians and Chinese tell them that the West is selfish and decadent.

One of the major accusations held against the West is what is now being referred to as “same weight, different measures.” Nearly unlimited mobilization of Ukraine, coupled with disinterest in other crises around the world. Or, even earlier, the South waiting for COVID vaccines, while the North took them first.

French President Emmanuel Macron with Mia Mottley, the Prime Minister of Barbados.

French President Emmanuel Macron welcomes Mia Mottley, the Prime Minister of Barbados.

Emmanuel Macron via Twitter

Has the Global South been heard?

The meeting in Paris was co-organized by France and the island of Barbados, where Prime Minister Mia Motley has been particularly active, showing that it is possible to help Ukraine and the world’s poorest countries at the same time. That is her theory.

The path to action will be difficult because the philosophies on this issue are different in Washington D.C., in Europe, or in China, which was the first creditor to developing countries.

Will the countries of the “Global South” leave Paris thinking that their voices have been heard? Or will they be more susceptible to messages from the Russians and Chinese, who tell them that the West is selfish and decadent?

This is an issue of the geopolitical balance of power, but also and above all the fate of millions of men and women hit hard by the disturbances of the world. And it's only just begun.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Germany

She Was The Anti-Oppenheimer, Down To The Very Last Atom

The movie ‘Oppenheimer’ makes no mention of Lise Meitner, the co-discoverer of nuclear fission. But she would have wanted it that way.

image of a woman and man in a laboratory

Physicist Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn in a laboratory, 1912

Olivia Campbell

The film “Oppenheimer,” which tells the story of the Manhattan Project’s development of the atomic bomb, has made quite a splash this summer, with audiences and critics alike hailing it as a riveting slice of scientific history. But it also has some viewers asking: Where are the women?

In the film, Lilli Hornig is the only woman scientist named and portrayed working on the project, though she was not the only one involved. Charlotte Serber, shown as project leader J. Robert Oppenheimer’s secretary, actually did far more. Some scholars argue that physicist Lise Meitner, co-discoverer of nuclear fission, should have been included.

As a biographer of historical women scientists, I should be the first in line to decry the erasure or minimization of women’s contributions. But should women be written into stories merely for the sake of representation, without first considering the context and the person? Is this what they would have wanted?

In Meitner’s case, the answer is “no.” Her discovery may have been crucial to creating the atomic bomb, but she wanted nothing to do with it nor wanted to be depicted in films about it. And I believe Meitner’s refusal to participate in the weaponization of her work on moral grounds makes her more worthy of commemoration than Oppenheimer. She chose humanity over notoriety.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital MagazineNEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest