When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Will Germans Hold Merkel Responsible For Terror Spree?

Nice, Turkey, Wurzburg, Ansbach. The escalating violence of the last few days raise the pressure on the German Chancellor, whose refugee policy is again in the spotlight. The political repercussions could strike where it matters to her most.

Angela Merkel attends press conference after shootout in Munich.
Angela Merkel attends press conference after shootout in Munich.
Robert Roßmann

BERLIN — Until recently, it had seemed Angela Merkel had turned things around for 2016. The number of new refugees arriving in Germany seemed to be down to a manageable level, and the popularity of her party, the CDU (Christian Democratic Union), was on the rise. Chancellor Merkel seemed to be all set for a relaxing summer break in Southern Tyrol.

But then things went bad very quickly. It began with the July 14 terror attack in Nice, followed quickly by the attempted coup in Turkey, the dictatorial reaction of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to said coup, the axe terrorist of Wurzburg, the killing spree in Munich, the knife attack in Reutlingen and the suicide bomber of Ansbach. There were only 10 days between the terror attacks in Nice and Ansbach. But the events in these days have drastically changed the domestic political situation that Merkel faces.

The violent attacks do not seem to have a common thread linking them directly. But what all of these attacks DO have in common is their outcome, namely the spreading of fear that undermines the standing of the government.

But beyond the general anxiety, Merkel risks being branded as the person responsible for this summer of terror, because of her refugee policies. It is certainly true that not all perpetrators were refugees, and in any case were in Germany without having benefitted from Merkel's refugee policies. And it is also true that several of these attacks were not even necessarily linked to Islamic radicalism. But the electorate tends to not make these finer points of distinction.

The CDU tried to capitalize on the general feeling of security that most citizens tended to feel during the German regional elections in March, presenting their program with the slogan "So that security will not just be a word but a feeling once more." But even leading CDU politicians admit that, at the moment, that feeling of security is pretty scarce on the ground.

Moreover, the much talked-about EU-Turkey refugee agreement, signed in May by Berlin and Ankara and instigated by Merkel, will now face even further criticisms.

The next regional elections are set to be held in the northern state of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania on September 4th. Earlier polls had shown that both extreme right wing parties, the AfD (Alternative for Germany) and the NPD (National Democratic Party of Germany, Neo-Nazis) were likely to receive 23% of the votes. That number is bound to increase after these recent events. Some CDU sources already say they fear that the AfD may win the majority of votes in Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. That would be a doubly tough blow to Merkel, since it's her home state.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Life On "Mars": With The Teams Simulating Space Missions Under A Dome

A niche research community plays out what existence might be like on, or en route to, another planet.

Photo of a person in a space suit walking toward the ​Mars Desert Research Station near Hanksville, Utah

At the Mars Desert Research Station near Hanksville, Utah

Sarah Scoles

In November 2022, Tara Sweeney’s plane landed on Thwaites Glacier, a 74,000-square-mile mass of frozen water in West Antarctica. She arrived with an international research team to study the glacier’s geology and ice fabric, and how its ice melt might contribute to sea level rise. But while near Earth’s southernmost point, Sweeney kept thinking about the moon.

“It felt every bit of what I think it will feel like being a space explorer,” said Sweeney, a former Air Force officer who’s now working on a doctorate in lunar geology at the University of Texas at El Paso. “You have all of these resources, and you get to be the one to go out and do the exploring and do the science. And that was really spectacular.”

That similarity is why space scientists study the physiology and psychology of people living in Antarctic and other remote outposts: For around 25 years, people have played out what existence might be like on, or en route to, another world. Polar explorers are, in a way, analogous to astronauts who land on alien planets. And while Sweeney wasn’t technically on an “analog astronaut” mission — her primary objective being the geological exploration of Earth — her days played out much the same as a space explorer’s might.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest