When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


Why Obama Rolled Out The Red Carpet For Hollande

French President Francois Hollande is as popular in official circles in Washington as he is unpopular with the citizens of the country that elected him. Story of a unique alliance.

Barack Obama and Francois Hollande, all smiles on Tuesday
Barack Obama and Francois Hollande, all smiles on Tuesday
Lucie Robequain

PARIS — Barack Obama is going all out. He is receiving François Hollande for a state visit, a privilege he has granted to only six heads of state since arriving at the White House. But such an honor raises the stakes on Hollande's three-day visit to the United States.

The two met on Feb. 10 at the Monticello estate, the historical home of President Thomas Jefferson, one of the first ambassadors in Paris. An abundance of luxury and good food is also planned for the evening of Feb. 11 for the dinner at the White House, where tuxedos are of course required.

Like his predecessor, Obama has never been especially fond of such meetings. He does not agree to them as easily as did Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton. Indeed, this is his first in nearly two years, with the last state visitor being British Prime Minister David Cameron in March 2012.

In addition to depriving him from dining with his wife and daughters, these meetings are inconveniently formal and expensive — old-fashioned customs of state that do not necessarily correspond to the exigencies of 21st century diplomacy.

With this state visit, Obama is bestowing an honor reserved for a strategic ally more than for a friend. And indeed, this visit is not about friendship. Both men barely know each other. Apart from the G20 and the G8, they've had no other occasions to meet.

Feigning a close personal relationship is the part of the character of neither François Hollande’s nor Barack Obama, with the protocol made even more complicated after the French president's recent separation from his companion Valerie Trierweiler.

The choreography is very far from the bucolic picnic to which George W. Bush had invited Nicolas Sarkozy during the summer of 2007, in his family residence in Maine. Very far also from the — largely artificial — intimacy with which Sarkozy acted toward Obama.

Hollande also falls much deeper than his predecessor within the tradition of French heads of state. Like François Mitterrand and Jacques Chirac, he bears this Gaullist attitude, made of respect and sovereignty. “Sarko the American” wanted to stand side-by-side with President Obama; Hollande prefers facing him. He affirmed his independence as soon as he took office by announcing the withdrawal of French troops from Afghanistan in May 2012.

None of this is likely to displease Barack Obama. Despite his broad smile, the man never particularly appreciated Nicolas Sarkozy’s familiarity. The form should not overshadow the substance: In fact, relations between the two countries have improved greatly in the last 10 years.

Leading from behind

As strange as it may seem, approval of Hollande has increased in the U.S., as much as it has plummeted in France. The determination he displayed while handling the intervention in Mali and in the Central African Republic got high marks in Washington, particularly among Republicans. Long maligned for its opposition to the war in Iraq, France has now reclaimed its place among its friends, countries that dare to risk the lives of their soldiers to block Islamist radicalism.

France has shown a willingness to send its troops even ahead of any U.S. intervention, which suits the White House perfectly: It is even at the heart of its strategy, dubbed by diplomats as “leading from behind.”

Of course, the two presidents have had a few hitches these last few months. Obama’s decision to consult Congress before an intervention in Syria, while French pilots were ready to take off, humiliated the Elysée. “Everything was ready for the day that we’d chosen,” François Hollande told Time magazine last week.

A faux-pas more than an act of contempt, Obama offended the only European head of state that supported him unconditionally on the Syrian issue. It is actually not impossible that the state visit was called as a way to make up for this diplomatic incident.

Still, the two presidents have many common interests. Obama is not unhappy to have a European leader who dares to defy German-led economic policy of austerity. The French model, of course, is not something the Americans seek — but Paris still has enough political influence in Europe to encourage policies to stimulate economic growth, which can boost American exports.

François Hollande is now proud to call himself a "social-democrat," and has never talked so much about economic competitiveness as he has in recent weeks.

But let’s be clear: The meeting between the two presidents is fundamentally about diplomacy rather than economics. The Syrian case is far from being closed, with the second round of the Geneva peace talks between the Damascus regime and the opposition. On this dossier, Paris remains Washington’s best ally. British Prime Minister David Cameron is completely paralyzed by his Parliament. As for Angela Merkel, she is perpetuating the German tradition of not intervening in military conflicts.

The number of great powers concerned with guaranteeing security in the world has decreased at an alarming pace. And so this is why, today more than ever, the White House needs France.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Joshimath, The Sinking Indian City Has Also Become A Hotbed Of Government Censorship

The Indian authorities' decision to hide factual reports on the land subsidence in Joshimath only furthers a sense of paranoia.

Photo of people standing next to a cracked road in Joshimath, India

Cracked road in Joshimath

@IndianCongressO via Twitter
Rohan Banerjee*

MUMBAI — Midway through the movie Don’t Look Up (2021), the outspoken PhD candidate Kate Dibiasky (Jennifer Lawrence) is bundled into a car, a bag over her head. The White House, we are told, wants her “off the grid”. She is taken to a warehouse – the sort of place where CIA and FBI agents seem to spend an inordinate amount of time in Hollywood movies – and charged with violating national security secrets.

The Hobson’s choice offered to her is to either face prosecution or suspend “all public media appearances and incendiary language relating to Comet Dibiasky”, an interstellar object on a collision course with earth. Exasperated, she acquiesces to the gag order.

Don’t Look Upis a satirical take on the collective apathy towards climate change; only, the slow burn of fossil fuel is replaced by the more imminent threat of a comet crashing into our planet. As a couple of scientists try to warn humanity about its potential extinction, they discover a media, an administration, and indeed, a society that is not just unwilling to face the truth but would even deny it.

This premise and the caricatured characters border on the farcical, with plot devices designed to produce absurd scenarios that would be inconceivable in the real world we inhabit. After all, would any government dealing with a natural disaster, issue an edict prohibiting researchers and scientists from talking about the event? Surely not. Right?

On January 11, the National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), one of the centers of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), issued a preliminary report on the land subsidence issue occurring in Joshimath, the mountainside city in the Himalayas.

The word ‘subsidence’ entered the public lexicon at the turn of the year as disturbing images of cracked roads and tilted buildings began to emanate from Joshimath.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest