When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Geopolitics

What's Behind Putin's New Push To Tame Far-Right Racism?

Recent race riots and far-right pre-election rhetoric have brought the issue of xenophobia back into the national spotlight in Russia. Prime Minister Putin is proposing a new government body to help keep ethnic tensions at bay, though some activists are s

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin

Worldcrunch NEWS BITES

MOSCOW -- Five months to go before the next legislative elections, the Kremlin is turning its attention to the issue of inter-ethnic racism. In recent weeks violent brawls between Russians and ethnic Caucasians near St. Petersburg and the Urals have placed the perennial problem back in the headlines.

In late July, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin called for the establishment of an "inter-ministerial structure in charge of ethnic associations." The proposal follows recent talks between Putin and religious and cultural associations. The prime minister invited the organizations to contribute to his Russian Popular Front, a new political machine Putin created for the upcoming elections.

At the same time, the Moscow municipal government is launching a $4 million city-wide public awareness campaign under the slogan "Don't Support Racism."

Just campaign propaganda?

Many analysts see Prime Minister Putin's maneuverings as pure politics – part of a pre-election strategy to widen the Russian Popular Front's appeal. "It's a political strategy. Vladimir Putin's initiative is useless," says Natalia Ioudina, a representative from SOVA, a Russian NGO analyzing xenophobia in Russia. "Such organizations already exist. Why create the same thing all over again?"

The rise of xenophobia and the recent race riots are of serious concern to the Kremlin, which does not want to see an independent far-right political force emerge at such a crucial period. Analysts and government authorities note that xenophobia has wide public appeal in Russia. Polls suggest that as much as 40% of the population indentifies itself as racist. One in 20 expresses a willingness to participate in race riots.

To co-opt nationalist voters, the Kremlin relies on the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), a party with strong nationalist leanings led by Vladimir Jirinovski, a controversial figure. The party supports all the legislation the Kremlin presents to the parliament.

"The nationalist rhetoric comes out inevitably at every election," says Ioudina. "But I think that as in the past, the government will be able to keep the far-right in check."

While pro-government media makes an effort to ease interethnic tensions, many racist websites operate freely and spread propaganda among Russian people. They all use one slogan in particular: "Russia should stop supporting the Caucasus."

Read the full article in French by Emmanuel Grynszpan

Photo - World Economic Forum

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Facing Down The "Violence Stigma" Of Mental Health Illness

Sensationalist TV coverage and even experts still often link mental health struggles and violent crimes, even though people with mental health difficulties commit fewer crimes comparatively. It's time to end the stigma.

Photo of two wooden figurines

Wooden figurines

Sara R. Gallardo

People like me who have mental health disorders suffer more violence than we inflict on others, yet we continue to carry the stigma of being unpredictable and aggressive individuals.

In the "events" section of a morning TV program I saw, for example, there was some news with sensationalist overtones. The first was about a son who had killed his father and the second was about an individual who had beaten another and left him in a coma.

The journalistic decisions in the presentation and commentary of both events were as follows: in the first case, the alleged perpetrator must necessarily have "mental disorders" to justify his conduct. But in the second case, it was not "necessary" to jump to that conclusion because the information focused on the bad reputation of the alleged aggressor, nicknamed "The Nazi".

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest