Geopolitics

Was A French Military Chaplain In Afghanistan A Raging Islamophobe?

Upon returning from Afghanistan, French Army Chaplain Julien de Pommerol accused the military of bending to Islamic pressures and "babouche-licking." Some accuse him of Islamophobia, others applaud his candor.

French forces and Afghan National Army soldiers inaugurate a new bridge in Kapisa (isafmedia)
French forces and Afghan National Army soldiers inaugurate a new bridge in Kapisa (isafmedia)
Nathalie Guibert and Stéphanie Le Bars

Every year, the chief of the French army addresses the young officers graduating from the prestigious Saint-Cyr military academy. But this year, there was a break with tradition. General Elrick Irastroza did not just give the standard talk on rules of command: he reminded his audience of Article 1 of the Constitution, which establishes France's prized secularism, or "laïcité", and freedom of belief.

His comments on the Constitution were hardly a casual choice. He was making reference to the poisonous issue of Benoit Julien de Pommerol, a controversial military chaplain stationed last year in Afghanistan.

Last summer, after a tour of duty in Afghanistan, Pommerol wrote an end-of-mission report denouncing the French army's "deference" to and "almost servile fear" of Islam. He went on to accuse the army of "babouche-licking." Less than a year later, the chaplain is adamant: "It's not charitable to keep scandals under wraps."

In his report, Julien cites several examples of what he sees as deviances: female soldiers wearing the veil, building mosques "with French taxpayers' money," and preparing an end-of-Ramadan feast for Afghans.

Strikes chord with some soldiers

The "Pommerol report" should have remained a secret. Instead, it was published on the Internet, sparking extreme reactions among growing tensions towards Islam in France. Many Catholic soldiers rejected the report. For others, however, the chaplain's words seem to have struck a cord.

"I don't think we can speak of Islamophobia, but if this report was exploited, that means it fits with national sensitivities that can be referred to as anti-Islamic," admits Luc Ravel, a military bishop. He believes the chaplain's report to be "troubling in form," "violent, excessive and obsessive." But he refuses to judge its meaning, and questions the nature of the reported facts. "Were these misinterpreted acts of respect or orders of submission?"

"There are no other instructions to be given other than the texts that guarantee secularism," said the chief of the French armed forces. "Then it's a matter courtesy, common sense and education to respect other people's religion." The army admitted a "mistake," regarding the order given to a female soldier to cover her head, but denied Pommerol's other accusations.

French Foreign Minister Gerard Longuet called the report "exaggerated or vague," saying the French army has been trying to "earn acceptance by respecting local customs." That a soldier was asked to cover her head was "in no way a general rule of behavior (…) but a specific decision made in a specific operational context." The context, in this case, was a joint mission with the Afghan army.

In September, Julien will become the military chaplain in the French Antilles. "This is not a punishment," according to Longuet's entourage.

Photo credit - Isafmedia

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

Taliban Redux, Cleaned-Up Image Can't Mask Their Cruel Reality

Twenty years later the Islamist group is back in power in Afghanistan, but trying this time to win international support. Now that several months have passed, experts on the ground can offer a clear assessment if the group has genuinely transformed on such issues as women's rights and free speech.

The Taliban have now been in power for almost five months

Atal Ahmadzai and Faten Ghosn

The international community is closely monitoring the Taliban, after the group re-seized power in Afghanistan in August 2021.

There is legitimate reason for concern. The Taliban are again ruling through fear and draconian rules.

The Taliban’s last regime, in the mid-1990s, was marked by human rights violations, including massacres, mass detentions and rape. The regime collapsed on Nov. 14, 2001, shortly after the U.S. launched its global war on terrorism.

Even after the Taliban officially fell from power, their subsequent two decades of insurgency produced various gross human rights violations, an encompassing term under international human rights law.

Keep reading... Show less
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS
MOST READ