When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Venezuela

Venezuela After Chavez - How The Country Will Fare If The *Caudillo* Goes Away?

Rain or shine, 2013 may be a tough year in Venezuela
Rain or shine, 2013 may be a tough year in Venezuela

-Editorial-

If there is one thing that both government supporters and the opposition in Venezuela can agree on: daily life in is an endless series of unnecessary frustrations.

Here are just a couple of recent examples: problems with the ports delayed the arrival of Christmas trees – which are imported from Canada – raising the price so much that a tree now goes for $100. There are essentially no spare parts for cars on the markets. Homes that are constructed for the government are built so quickly that there is no quality control and the pipes leak all over.

So how can you explain the fact that a sick Hugo Chavez was reelected with a large margin last October?

The answer lies in Chavez’s personality and his ability to seduce, as well as in the money that he has given away, with equal doses of generosity and irresponsibility. Like all of the caudillos (Spanish for military strongman) in history – there are plenty of examples – he managed to convince the majority of the people that there is no other boss but him. He convinced them that his revolution is good, and that he, Chavez, is a symbol of that revolution. And if the reality does not fit that conviction, then that is not his fault; it is because of North American imperialism. Or it is because of the opposition. Or perhaps the middle managers in the Venezuelan government who don’t know how to put his ideas into practice.

There are other factors that led to Chavism, like corruption, the decay of traditional political parties and the lack of solid civil society institutions. Chavez and Chavism are products of Venezuelan history.

But now that Chavez is facing the prospect of his own death, he is also facing the death of his politic project. Just as has happened to all caudillos in history.

A head of government who does not value the structures of government can only take them apart if he constructs others to take their place. But autocrats don’t trust structures, because that would require trusting other people, and autocrats, by definition, don’t trust anyone. They want to make all of the decisions and give all orders.

The responsibility of the head of government, more than giving all the orders or making all the decisions, is to lead a group of people who together complete a program of governance. Governing a country, perhaps more than any other thing, is a team job.

Chavez never understood that. By insisting on making all the decisions himself and surrounding himself by yes-men, he weakened the political, economic and administrative institutions in Venezuela, and his attitude of “after me, the flood,” turned into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Dying president

Oncologists who have followed Chavez’s surgeries, radiation and chemotherapies agree that his symptoms, recurrences and treatments is consistent with a diagnosis of sarcoma, a rare form of cancer that is very difficult to fight, that attacks the muscles and ligaments in the pelvic zone. The Venezuelan government has guarded a strict silence regarding the clinical details of their caudillo’s health, but a couple of American doctors who are specialists in Sarcoma told the Wall Street Journal that Chavez probably has about a 50% chance of dying in the next six months.

Venezuela is preparing for Chavez’s impending death, if he even manages to make it to his third inauguration as president, planned for Jan. 10. That means – according to Venezuela’s constitution – presidential elections within 30 days of his death.

Chavez has named his loyal vice-president, Nicolas Maduro, as his successor, but Maduro is incapable to replace Chavez – not as a leader, nor as a candidate – precisely because of his loyalty. Maduro represents the “civil wing,” a more socialist branch of Chavezism. Another wing of Chavez’s party is more nationalistic than socialist, and has distanced itself from Havana and has already found a potential presidential candidate, the former soldier, deputy and president of the National Assembly, Diosdado Cabello.

The opposition, which has been divided in countless factions since the beginning of Chavez’s reign, finally united behind Henrique Capriles for the last presidential elections in Oct. and won 45% of the vote. If Capriles runs in the next presidential elections, it is likely that the opposition will remain united around him. That scenario is even more likely given that Capriles was re-elected governor of the state of Miranda.

The tragedy for Venezuela is that in all of the probably scenarios, the power vacuums and the institutional weakness will likely translate to battles in the government, which has been weakened by Chavez, who governed like a caudillo instead of acting like a president. The government will tend towards fragmentation and the armed forces will entrench themselves in the bastions of economic power that they have already conquered. The Venezuelan military controls companies and businesses to an extent that is not seen anywhere else in modern Latin America, and the military will be an incredibly important variable no matter what scenario ends up being the reality in Venezuela.

All of this is happening as a new year starts, one that is projected to be economically difficult, after the overspending in 2012. Predicted economic troubles include the devaluation of the Bolivar, Venezuela’s currency, high inflation and growth rates much lower than in 2012.

Even if the opposition remains united and manages to elect Henrique Capriles as president of Venezuela in 2013 or 2014, turning the country into a real democracy will by no means be an easy task.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

Utter Pessimism, What Israelis And Palestinians Share In Common

Right now, according to a joint survey of Israelis and Palestinians, hopes for a peaceful solution of coexistence simply don't exist. The recent spate of violence is confirmation of the deepest kind of pessimism on both sides for any solution other than domination of the other.

An old Palestinian protester waves Palestinian flag while he confronts the Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the village of Beit Dajan near the West Bank city of Nablus.

A Palestinian protester confronts Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the West Bank village of Beit Dajan on Jan. 6.

Pierre Haski

-Analysis-

PARIS — Just before the latest outbreak of violence between Israelis and Palestinians, a survey of public opinion among the two peoples provided a key to understanding the current situation unfolding before our eyes.

It was a joint study, entitled "Palestinian-Israeli Pulse", carried out by two research centers, one Israeli, the other Palestinian, which for years have been regularly asking the same questions to both sides.

The result is disastrous: not only is the support for the two-state solution — Israel and Palestine side by side — at its lowest point in two decades, but there is now a significant share of opinion on both sides that favors a "non-democratic" solution, i.e., a single state controlled by either the Israelis or Palestinians.

This captures the absolute sense of pessimism commonly felt regarding the chances of the two-state option ever being realized, which currently appears to be our grim reality today. But the results are also an expression of the growing acceptance on both sides that it is inconceivable for either state to live without dominating the other — and therefore impossible to live in peace.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest