When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!
Geopolitics

The U.S. Has Quietly Told Europe It Won't Fight On Its Behalf Again

It went largely unnoticed, but Washington's refusal to let MiG fighter jets destined for the Ukrainians take off from their base in Germany is a clear message, according to a retired French general: Even if a NATO country is attacked, the U.S. will never send their soldiers to fight on our soil.

photo of american flag of beach and coastline

View above Normandy beaches on June 6, 2020

U.S. Air Force/ZUMA
Vincent Desportes*

-OpEd-

PARIS — With its back to the wall, America's mask has come off. This great nation, which 80 years ago stood at the height of its moral strength, which claims to be the bulwark of freedom and democracy, has lowered its head in the face of the challenge.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

We, the people of Europe, believed in her. During the Cold War, the U.S. military trained every year to rapidly deploy tens of thousands of soldiers from American soil to hold back Soviet forces.


Of course, General Charle de Gaulle quickly understood that Washington would never sacrifice itself for Paris and that France had to have the ultimate weapon, but we would count on a solid support: America was ready to sacrifice its sons en masse for its values on our soil.

Putin did not miss this “decoupling” opportunity 

We now know, since March 9, 2022, that this is not, and will no longer be, the case. Private Ryan will never die on our beaches again.

The facts no longer have room for ambiguity. Faced with the difficulties of the Ukrainian forces, Washington urged, from the very first week, the NATO countries capable of doing so should reinforce Ukraine with their MiG29s: Ukrainian pilots were capable of using them, unlike Western aircrafts, which would require too much pilot training to master them. In compensation, the Americans proposed, the willing countries will receive more modern F16s.

Putin immediately seized this great opportunity to decouple Europe and the United States: He declared that any country whose MiGs took off towards the Ukrainian sky should in fact become a belligerent. The threat is clear: that of a flight of Russian missiles successfully tested in Syria.

In the event of conflict, Europe will remain alone 

The Polish president, who volunteered to donate MiGs, agreed to take the risk but not alone: If, by donating his planes, he enters the war, then so must NATO — and therefore, the United States. He proposed that his MiGs take off not from Poland but from the U.S. military base in Ramstein, Germany, which would make the United States a de facto co-belligerent.

It clarifies the situation: in this existential crisis, Europe is alone and will remain so.

So Washington – which, for ages, has vowed to the Europeans in NATO that it would fight for them – backs down. The American duplicity appears clearly: These planes, declared useful yesterday if they took off from Poland, suddenly no longer “change the balance of power significantly” if they take off from an American base!

Words and weapons, yes; words and deeds, no.

This decision is hardly surprising since, from the beginning, the U.S. authorities (pivoted towards China and the midterm elections) claim that their soldiers will never participate in this war. In reality, it clarifies the situation: In this existential crisis, the greatest since World War II, Europe is alone and will remain so even if the Russian troops do not stop at the NATO border.

photo of blinken and biden

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken listens to President Biden

Rod Lamkey/CNP via ZUMA

Second pillar of the West 

We should have known better! Didn’t Barack Obama, advised by his Vice-President Joe Biden, back down in 2013 when Syria crossed the red line? Didn’t Donald Trump, proclaiming his “America First”, abandon the Kurds, declaring that he would never send a soldier to die for Podgorica and explicitly refuse to commit to collective defense?

Not to mention the brutal abandonment of Afghanistan ...

Of course, the United States supports Ukraine, with this new aid of $14 billion voted on the evening of March 9, as if to make us forget their retreat that same morning. They have delivered 2,000 Stinger missiles and 17,000 anti-tank missiles. They will continue to fight ... “from behind,” as Obama said, even if some elements of the 82nd Airborne Division have just been deployed in Poland.

But let’s be sure we've learn the lesson once and for all: The blood that's shed will be ours.

Let us prepare, without any illusion about the American defense “umbrella.” Let us quickly regain our military autonomy and European sovereignty. Let us be the powerful and peaceful geopolitical actor that world peace needs. Our security requires that we become the second solid pillar of the so-called “West,” ready to make hard decisions.

*Vincent Desportes is a retired French Army general and military theorist who served as military attaché in the French embassy in the U.S.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Ideas

How U.S. Airlines Are Doing Cuba's Dirty Work On American Soil

American and Southwest Airlines have been refusing to allow Cubans on board flights if they've been blacklisted by the government in Havana.

How U.S. Airlines Are Doing Cuba's Dirty Work On American Soil

Boarding a plane in Camaguey, Cuba

Santiago Villa

On Sunday, American Airlines refused to let Cuban writer Carlos Manuel Álvarez board a Miami flight bound for Havana. It was at least the third time this year that a U.S. airline refused to let Cubans on board to return to their homeland after Havana circulated a government "blacklist" of critics of the regime. Clearly undemocratic and possibly illegal under U.S. law, the airlines want to make sure to cash in on a lucrative travel route, writes Colombian journalist Santiago Villa:

-OpEd-

Imagine for a moment that you left your home country years ago because you couldn't properly pursue your chosen career there. It wasn't easy, of course: Your profession is not just singularly demanding, but even at the top of the game you might not be assured a stable or sufficient income, and you've had to take on second jobs, working in bars and restaurants.

This chosen vocation is that of a writer or journalist, or perhaps an artist, which has kept you tied to your homeland, often the subject of your work, even if you don't live there anymore.

Since leaving, you've been back home several times, though not so much for work. Because if you did, you would be followed in cars and receive phone calls to let you know you are being watched.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest