When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!

AP, CNN, REUTERS, NEW YORK TIMES (U.S.), THE GUARDIAN (UK)

Worldcrunch

FORT MEADE- Wikileaks whistleblower, Bradley Manning pleaded guilty on Thursday to 10 of the 22 charges he is accused of in what the U.S. government calls the largest leak of classified documents in the nation’s history, writes CNN.

There are many moving parts to this story. Here are the five things you need to know about the pre-trial hearings.

[rebelmouse-image 27086358 alt="""" original_size="192x240" expand=1]

U.S. Army

WHY? Private first class Manning is in military court in Maryland and has refuted the most serious charge on him: aiding the enemy. The AP reports that Manning believed the information wouldn't harm the U.S. and he decided to release it because he was upset by way the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were being conducted.

“I felt I accomplished something that would allow me to have a clear conscience,” he said Thursday during nearly an hour of testimony. Manning said that too often American troops disregarded the lives of the ordinary people there. “In attempting counterinsurgency operations, we became obsessed with capturing and killing human targets on lists.”

WIKILEAKS AS LAST RESORT Wikileaks wasn’t the first place that Manning turned to while on leave in January 2010. According to CNN, Manning said that he first called The Washington Post and wasn’t taken seriously. He then called The New York Times and got no response, so he finally decided to send the documents to the Wikileaks organization. His intention was to spark a public debate about foreign policy in Iraq and Afghanistan, writes the New York Times.

BRUTAL REALITY The reports that were released added up to a history of the “day-to-day reality” in both war zones that he believed showed the flaws in the counterinsurgency policy the United States was then pursuing according to the New York Times. In February 2010, after he returned to Iraq, Private Manning sent more files to WikiLeaks, including a video of a 2007 incident in Iraq in which American forces killed a group of men, including two Reuters journalists, and then fired again on a van that pulled up to help the victims.

[rebelmouse-image 27086359 alt="""" original_size="320x215" expand=1]

Elekhh

OPENING UP? His trial has been called a “theatre of the absurd” by Michael Ratner, attorney for Wikileaks and Julian Assange in the U.S., as quoted in The Guardian. The media and public have been denied all access to evidence, court documents, court orders and discussions that will eventually seal Manning’s fate. Thursday was the first time that Manning offered his own version of events.

[rebelmouse-image 27086360 alt="""" original_size="320x213" expand=1]

Snapperjack

INCARCERATIONReuters says that Manning has been held at Quantico Marine Base in Virginia for more than 1,000 days now. On Tuesday, a military judge reduced any sentence that he is finally given by 112 days because of the harsh treatment he received during his detention. Manning said he was stripped to his underwear every night and forced to sit "in essential blindness", without his prescription eyeglasses. He faces a maximum sentence of 20 years for the 10 charges he pled guilty to on Thursday. If he is convicted of aiding the enemy he faces life imprisonment.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Parental Rights v. Children Rights? Why Courts Keep Getting It Wrong

Justice works around adults. Keen to uphold parental custody rights, family courts have effectively allowed violence against children by giving abusive parents access. So it is time the legal system stopped ignoring children.

Photo of a child sitting on a bench

Child sitting on a bench

Catalina Ruiz-Navarro

-OpEd-

BOGOTA — Recently a sound recording from Bogotá of a 10-year-old girl crying and pleading not to be made to live with her father went viral online. The father had faced two sets of charges relating to domestic violence and sexual abuse of the girl, who had earlier described to court doctors his inappropriate physical contact.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest

InterNations