When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Egypt

Poverty In Egypt On The Rise, With Urban-Rural Divide Deepening

Poverty is getting worse in Egypt, particularly in rural areas, according to a study released by the government statistics agency. Analysts blame the worsening situation in rural regions on the government’s bias in recent years towards funding urban devel

Rural parts of Egypt are still waiting for their 'Arab Spring'
Rural parts of Egypt are still waiting for their 'Arab Spring'

CAIRO - Measuring poverty in Egypt, like everything else, now means looking at before and after the fall of the Mubarak regime. But it is equally important to look at a rural-urban divide that risks creating new divisions in the country.

Between 2004 and 2009, the percentage of Egyptians living at or below the World Bank's official poverty line of $2 per day increased from 19.6 percent to 21.8 percent, the Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS) study found.

Instances of poverty increased at a much higher rate, 4.6 percent, in the rural parts of Upper Egypt, where 43.7 percent of the population lives in poverty, according to the study. Urban governorates, such as Cairo, Giza and Alexandria, saw poverty increases as well, but by 1 percent, as compared to 6.9 percent for the overall population.

"During Mubarak's reign, Egyptian developmental policies exhibited a notable urban bias that led to such a high rate of poverty in rural areas," said Reem Saad, a professor of Social Anthropology at the American University in Cairo. "In my research, I saw many rural residents collecting money among themselves to provide basic infrastructure that people in urban governorates never have to think about."

The urban bias in distribution of national wealth, coupled with the "do-it-yourself attitude" the government has taken toward rural areas, are causing income and development to lag in these areas, Saad argues.

Politicians as "sons of peasants'

"I've seen many cases where villagers are forced to pay for the most basic services, such as building a school for their kids and securing a post office building by reinforcing the walls," she says.

But if the autocratic Mubarak ignored the needs of rural Egyptians and allowed more of them to fall into poverty, the post-Mubarak transition indicates that there might be reason for optimism, as potential presidential candidates realize the need to address rural poverty.

Karama Party candidate Hamdeen Sabahi recently declared himself "a son of peasants," referencing his upbringing in the rural Kafr al-Sheikh governorate in an effort to endear himself to rural communities.

Mubarak's National Democratic Party (NDP) boasted of its developmental achievements between 2005 and 2010 during the November 2010 elections, but CAPMAS's findings differ from the NDP narrative.

Naggar estimated that a minimum wage earner back then could purchase – in today's money – LE1900 (US$319) worth of staple products. Today, after the minimum wage was adjusted to LE700 (US$117), most Egyptians still cannot afford to provide anything close to what they could afford back then.

Read the full story in English

Photo - Ed Yourdon

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Sleep Divorce: The Benefits For Couples In Having Separate Beds

Sleeping separately is often thought to be the beginning of the end for a loving couple. But studies show that having permanently separate beds — if you have the space and means — can actually reinforce the bonds of a relationship.

Image of a woman sleeping in a bed.

A woman sleeping in her bed.

BUENOS AIRES — Couples, it is assumed, sleep together — and sleeping apart is easily taken as a sign of a relationship gone cold. But several recent studies are suggesting, people sleep better alone and "sleep divorce," as the habit is being termed, can benefit both a couple's health and intimacy.

That is, if you have the space for it...

While sleeping in separate beds is seen as unaffectionate and the end of sex, psychologist María Gabriela Simone told Clarín this "is not a fashion, but to do with being able to feel free, and to respect yourself and your partner."

She says the marriage bed originated "in the matrimonial duty of sharing a bed with the aim of having sex to procreate." That, she adds, gradually settled the idea that people "who love each other sleep together."

Is it an imposition then, or an overwhelming preference? Simone says intimacy is one thing, sleeping another.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest