When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Geopolitics

Minerals And Violence: A Papal Condemnation Of African Exploitation, Circa 2023

Before heading to South Sudan to continue his highly anticipated trip to Africa, the pontiff was in the Democratic Republic of Congo where he delivered a powerful speech, in a country where 40 million Catholics live.

Minerals And Violence: A Papal Condemnation Of African Exploitation, Circa 2023
Pierre Haski

-Analysis-

PARIS — You may know the famous Joseph Stalin quote: “The Pope? How many divisions has he got?” Pope Francis still has no military divisions to his name, but he uses his voice, and he does so wisely — sometimes speaking up when no one else would dare.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo (the former Belgian Congo, a region plundered and martyred, before and after its independence in 1960), Francis has chosen to speak loudly. Congo is a country with 110 million inhabitants, immensely rich in minerals, but populated by poor people and victims of brutal wars.

That land is essential to the planetary ecosystem, and yet for too long, the world has not seen it for its true value.

The words of this 86-year-old pope, who now moves around in a wheelchair, deserve our attention. He undoubtedly said what a billion Africans are thinking: "Hands off the Democratic Republic of the Congo! Hands off Africa! Stop choking Africa: It is not a mine to be stripped or a terrain to be plundered!"


The pontiff pronounced these strong words shortly after he arrived in Kinshasa. But unfortunately, those are only words, for the Pope does not hold the power to change things. Still, what he said will most likely resonate for a long time on the African continent.

Photo of Pope Francis waving to a crowd from the top of a car in Kinshasa

Pope Francis in Kinshasa on Feb. 2

rdcpresidence's official Instagram account

The shock of violence

But the Pope’s message was both an inaugural intervention, and a long-term ambition being finally voiced. The Pope has been able to witness what kind of violence the RDC is going through, by talking with victims of violence that is shaking the east of the country. There, indeed, are where most of the coveted minerals lie. And there, atrocious things happen: murders, mutilations, rapes.

The Pope listened "shocked" to all of the testimonies: He added, “We are left without words; we can only weep in silence.”

But how to end the spiral of violence that is occurring in the east of the country, which has lasted for decades, and killed millions? Even the presence of the largest force of UN peacekeeping “blue helmets” has no chance of changing the situation.

The Pope wants to place the Church on the people’s side.

The troubled role of Rwanda came into the conversation. Rwanda is accused by Kinshasa, but also by the international community, of fueling this violence; but it’s not the only country to blame.

Challenging local bishops

The pastoral ambition of the Pope’s visit is obviously to reinforce and perpetuate the presence of the Catholic Church in the African continent. Part of the Church’s future depends on this enterprise. The DRC illustrates that point particularly well: the country has some 40 million Catholics, and the Pope brings together more than a million people at each event.

By making himself the outspoken advocate of Africans facing the ambitions of the world’s most powerful countries, Francis wants to place the Church on the people’s side. Doing that, he appears more daring than the local church leaders on the continent, who often hold more conservative positions.

Pope Francis pointed out one of the greatest contradictions of our time during his trip: the minerals needed for the ecological transition largely come from the DRC. Their extraction is a source of conflict, exploitation, and greed. Perhaps the world could listen to this truth before the contradiction swallows us all.


You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

The True Limits Of The Saudi-Iranian Deal Begin In Tehran

Iran and Saudi Arabia have announced they will restore diplomatic relations. The news may have proved startling — especially China's role — but is unlikely to dispel long-standing distrust between two regional rivals.

photo of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi speaking into a microphone

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi chairs cabinet's Economic Coordination Board in Tehran, on March 11

Iranian Presidency Office/APA Images via ZUMA
Kayhan London

-Analysis-

Observers have reacted to the planned restoration of diplomatic ties between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Saudi monarchy, with Chinese mediation, as a warning to the United States on its declining position in the Middle East — and China's arrival as a regional powerbroker.

The announcement even provoked accusations between government and opposition in Israel, which was likely hoping to normalize ties with Saudi Arabia in the framework of the Abraham Accords.

The U.S. website Axios recently cited an unnamed Israel official as blaming U.S. weakness under the current Democratic administration for this development in Middle East. While the United States remains Israel's chief ally, there is an inevitable clash of perspectives between the right-wing government in Tel Aviv and Washington.

Yet on Iran's regional threat, both sides insist they're on the same page.

Opponents of Israel's current Benjamin Netanyahu government have even blamed its divisive judicial reforms for distracting the country from regional affairs at a sensitive time. But the Israeli official cited in Axios observed that developments behind the scenes, including U.S.-Israeli collaborations, were more important than surface events.

In Iran, the breakthrough was presented by some as a victory against the West's bid to isolate the regime, which has deftly worked itself into a corner with its contested nuclear activities, alignment with Russia in Ukraine, and harsh repression of protesters in recent months. The conservative Kayhan newspaper, unrelated to Kayhan-London, called the deal a "working blow against America" and Israel.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest