When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Criticized At Home And Abroad, Chancellor Scholz Jeopardizes Germany's Leadership In Europe

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s speech shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine was hailed as a “turning point”. But two months on, for some international commentators, the bubble has burst. Some believe this spells the end for Germany’s leadership role in Europe, while others are calling Scholz the country’s worst chancellor since 1949.

Photo of Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) speaks at a press conference

Chancellor Olaf Scholz at a press conference

Cornelia Karin Hendrich


BERLIN — The German government has come in for criticism from international commentators for its half-hearted support of Ukraine.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine, Chancellor Olaf Scholz gave a speech that was widely seen as a turning point, and both the German public and the international community believed it marked a new direction for German foreign policy — more money for the army and security, and taking more responsibility for areas of the world in crisis.

But, two months on, it seems that for some international commentators, this hope has soured.

"Worst German chancellor"

Raphaël Glucksmann, a journalist and politician from the left-leaning, environmentally focused French party Place Publique, has said that the war in Ukraine marks the end of Germany’s leadership role in Europe. And he claims that is down to Scholz’s leadership.

Glucksmann, who is the son of the late philosopher André Glucksmann, tweeted: “Chancellor Scholz just confirmed it: We cannot count on Berlin to defend European principles and strategic interests. His position on energy embargo and on weapons delivery shows that the change we all hoped for did not happen. This war puts an end to German leadership in Europe.”

When fascism actually arrived, Germans funded it, and Ukrainians died fighting it.

Glucksmann is not Scholz’s only critic. Donald Tusk, the former President of the European Council and former Polish Prime Minister, tweeted: “The Germans must firmly support Ukraine today if we are to believe that they have drawn conclusions from their own history.”

Last week, Ukraine expert Sergej Sumlenny, former director of the Heinrich Böll Foundation in Kyiv, which is affiliated with the German Green Party, called Scholz the “worst German chancellor” since the Second World War. He said the Greens and the FDP were also responsible for the “disaster chancellor”, as he referred to Scholz. “The blood of our European neighbors is on your hands!”

Photo of \u200bPrime Minister Justin Trudeau and U.S. President Joe Biden , Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz at NATO headquarters in Belgium

Japan's Fumio Kishida, Canada's Justin Trudeau, U.S. President Joe Biden and Chancellor Scholz at the G7 summit in Belgium

The Canadian Press/ZUMA

Scholz criticized at home and abroad

U.S. historian Timothy Snyder accused Germany of hypocrisy. “For 30 years, Germans lectured Ukrainians about fascism,” he wrote. “When fascism actually arrived, Germans funded it, and Ukrainians died fighting it.” Snyder was presumably referring to the payments Germany is making to Russia for gas, coal and other energy sources. In 2022, Germany has already paid Russia several billion euros in exchange for energy.

The problem is the chancellor.

Scholz had already come in for criticism from both Ukraine and the country’s eastern European allies over his reluctance to supply heavy weaponry. He supports NATO sending heavy weapons to Ukraine, but does not want them to come directly from Germany. Last week, Ukrainian ambassador Andriy Melnyk said that the government in Kyiv had received the news “with great disappointment and bitterness”.

Scholz has also been criticised by his coalition partners. Green politician Anton Hofreiter and Free Democratic Party (FDP) politician Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann have both said that the military aid offered to Ukraine is not enough. Hofreiter called the chancellor a “ditherer and procrastinator”, whose vacillation could allow the situation to escalate and develop into a third World War.

“The problem is the Chancellor," he said, warning that every day brings more damage to Germany’s position in Europe and further afield.

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

War History Shows Why Russia Is Doomed In Southern Ukraine: Supply Lines

Many factors may soon align and force Russia to withdraw troops from Southern Ukraine, independent Russian publication Important Stories argues in an in-depth report on the situation on the ground.

Photograph of Russian soldiers taking part in a military exercise t a training ground of the Russian Central Military District

September 15, 2023: Russian assault units take part in a military exercise

Vazhnye Istorii


A century and a half ago, during the American Civil War of 1861–1865, the foundations of modern warfare were laid out, marking the transition to large-scale, industrial-era armies.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Innovations like the telegraph played a pivotal role, enabling coordinated operations across vast distances and swift responses to changing battle scenarios. The advent of breech-loading firearms and rifled artillery disrupted traditional infantry formations, driving soldiers into trenches for protection.

Meanwhile, the introduction of all-metal warships and the first use of submarines in combat hinted at the future of naval warfare. Balloons were employed for battlefield observation and reconnaissance, foreshadowing the era of aerial warfare.

Over the next five decades, automatic weapons, tanks, and aircraft further transformed the landscape of warfare. However, the most revolutionary and foundational innovation was the utilization of railways for the transportation and supply of troops. In 1862, the US Military Railroad Agency pioneered this concept, marking a historic milestone in military history.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest